Digital Interventions to Close the Treatment Gap for Binge Eating
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11108
2024-05-17
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:The study by Pruessner et al 1 demonstrated the effectiveness of a web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention compared with a waiting-list control among adults with binge eating disorder. Compared with the control condition, the 12-week digital intervention achieved greater reductions in binge eating episodes, eating disorder psychopathology, clinical impairment, and comorbid psychopathology (negative affect, anxiety, well-being, self-esteem, and emotion regulation) from baseline to after treatment. The authors also used ecological momentary assessment to support the robustness of their findings. Binge eating disorder is a prevalent, serious, and impairing psychiatric illness. Evidence-based face-to-face psychological treatments exist, but barriers prevent many individuals from seeking and receiving these services. Consequently, there is a pressing need to make available effective, scalable interventions for binge eating. Digital interventions, such as the one evaluated by Pruessner and colleagues, 1 have the potential to curb the mental health crisis by reaching large numbers of people in need and extending treatment beyond face-to-face psychotherapy sessions into the fabric of people's lives so that these tools are used in the moments and contexts when needed most. This innovation of digital interventions is particularly salient for addressing binge eating, given that eating decisions and prompts for dysregulated eating occur frequently throughout each day, making momentary supports especially valuable. The importance of Pruessner and colleagues' findings is strengthened because their digital intervention did not rely on human support for delivery. 1 Typically, digital interventions perform better when delivered with human support (guided) than without it (self-help). Even though guided digital interventions enable caseloads that surpass that of psychotherapy, the inclusion of human support still poses a challenge for scale because it bears the highest cost for digital intervention delivery. Therefore, self-help interventions that achieve clinically significant improvements in outcomes present an important opportunity for closing the treatment gap for binge eating. Given its effectiveness, the critical next step is to learn where and how to implement this intervention to broadly reach individuals in need. In their trial, the authors used several direct-to-consumer pathways to recruit participants with binge eating disorder: using online platforms (eg, social media and self-help forums), mailing lists, and eating disorder treatment centers. These are viable pathways to reach people in need outside of research, but implementation outcomes like reach and penetration, acceptability, and cost must be studied by deployment in the general population. 2 Direct-to-consumer approaches are common for digital interventions, but the seemingly high uptake can be belied once the relative proportion targeted is considered. 3 Some individuals with binge eating are not aware that this behavior is a clinical problem and modifiable; if they are not already activated to seek help, direct-to-consumer approaches could be missed. A recommendation from a clinician can yield substantially greater uptake into a digital mental health intervention than direct-to-consumer approaches. 4 Thus, implementation models that engage clinicians in the recommendation and referral processes or that couple direct-to-consumer approaches with clinician recommendations may be particularly impactful. Indeed, health care settings represent an obvious home for implementing digital interventions for binge eating; however, specifics remain to be determined. First is the question of which clinics are poised to offer binge eating intervention. Eating disorder treatment centers could benefit from a digital self-help intervention for binge eating, as the intervention could offset these clinics' commonly long waiting lists and preserve clinicians' time for patients who are most in need of clinician-delivered services. Lifestyle medicine programs could be another promising setting, as binge eating contributes to weight gain over time and can thwart weight loss treatment outcomes. Individuals with binge eating may present to weight loss programs, as these individuals often have overweight or obesity and commonly are interested in losing weight. Because addressing binge eating is typically beyond the scope of lifestyle medicine programs, in which the focus is on weight management, a self-help digital intervention for binge eating could complement their services. Finally, primary care clinics are commonly viewed as an ideal setting for referrals to mental health services, as they are often the first line of care, a site of routine visits, and typically grounded in a trusted relationship between the clinician and patient. Primary care clinicians -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal