Abstract:Sea-level rise due to climate change will have significant effects on coastal areas and populations. Adaptation policies recommend the managed realignment of the most vulnerable assets and activities. Despite their medium- and long-term benefits, these policies face significant friction due to social acceptability in the communities where they are implemented. This article investigates the hypothesis that respecting principles of justice in the implementation of managed realignment should increase its acceptability. We compare preferences of those people who are exposed to the risk of climate-change-induced flooding and those who are not, as regards funding managed retreat policies and defining compensation criteria for assets at risk. The main theories of social justice provide the four principles included in the analysis: efficiency, need, responsibility and priority assigned to property rights. A choice experiment survey was conducted with 258 residents of coastal and hinterland communities in the south of France. Four attributes were selected to define the managed realignment policy: the dialogue arrangements, the implementation period, the policy implementation schedule and the cost. The results show support for a relatively fast launch of these policies (within 15 years) but in stages and through a process of dialogue with the population. People's perceptions of the funding criteria reveal a preference for national solidarity. Finally, national funding of managed retreat policies and compensation criteria based on market prices have a significant positive influence on the acceptability of managed realignment policies, whereas introducing responsibility-based compensation criteria tends to favour the status quo over the adaptation policy. Policy relevance Prioritization of the funding criteria reveals the preference for national solidarity. Preferences for the justice criteria underpinning compensation reveal a great diversity of values. Besides implantation modalities, preferences for managed realignment policies depend on which level they are implemented at, on the expropriation criteria (the emphasis given to property rights, i.e. market price), on the attachment (people perceived as worst off, i.e. the property is their main residence rather than a second home or they have lower levels of income) and on the degree of responsibility (related to the date of purchase, i.e. on the information given at the time on the risk).

Towards principles and policy levers for advancing living shorelines

Enhancing Climate Resiliency Through Improving Ecosystem Services in Shoreline Municipalities – Lessons from Canada

Current extent and future opportunities for living shorelines in Australia

Living Shorelines Equal or Outperform Natural Shorelines as Fish Habitat Over Time: Updated Results from a Long-Term BACI Study at Multiple Sites

Reducing Barriers to Living Shorelines Through Sea Grant Extension Programs

Marsh boundary degradation into open-water in living shorelines under high-energy conditions

The Future of Developed Barrier Systems: 2. Alongshore Complexities and Emergent Climate Change Dynamics

Coastal landforms and fetch influence shoreline restoration effectiveness

The California Coast and Living Shorelines—A Critical Look

Shoreline restoration including armor removal and log placement affect ecosystem recovery through time

Preserve or retreat? Willingness-to-pay for Coastline Protection in New South Wales

Managing for Sandy Coastal Habitat in SW Florida: Institutional Complexities Hinder Local Agencies' Use of Best Practices

The Role of Social-Ecological Resilience in Coastal Zone Management: A Comparative Law Approach to Three Coastal Nations

Future Shorelines: A Living Shoreline Site Selection and Design Decision Support Tool that Incorporates Future Conditions Induced by Sea Level Rise

The Future of Developed Barrier Systems: 1. Pathways Toward Uninhabitability, Drowning, and Rebound

Ship wake forcing and performance of a living shoreline segment on an estuarine shoreline

Progress in coupling models of human and coastal landscape change

Impact of justice and solidarity variables on the acceptability of managed realignment

A framework for evaluating island restoration performance: A case study from the Chesapeake Bay

Untapped policy avenues to protect coral reef ecosystems

The Green Infrastructure of Sandy Coastlines: A Nature-Based Solution for Mitigation of Climate Change Risks