Abstract:In rectal cancer, accurate preoperative staging is essential to adequately select patients for different therapeutic regimes. Endosonography has been proven to be an accurate staging modality in multiple prospective studies. A recent large retrospective study, however, has cast doubt on the actual accuracy of endorectal ultrasound for staging rectal cancer in everyday clinical routines. The results of endosonographic staging of rectal tumours over a period of 10 years at the Department of Surgery of the University of Heidelberg are presented. In a first time period, 424 patients with rectal cancer were staged by endosonography and the data recorded prospectively. The examinations were exclusively done by four surgeons with high experience and scientific interest in endosonography. The second time period comprises 332 patients with rectal tumours (including adenomas) having undergone endosonography by six different examiners after introduction of this staging method into the clinical routine. The data here were analysed retrospectively. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the T and N classifications for both series. In the second series, eight factors which have been postulated to influence staging accuracy in the literature were included in a regression analysis in order to identify relevant factors for staging inaccuracies. Accuracy for staging of the T classification was 81% in the first series versus 71.7% in the second series. In the regression analysis of the second series, status post-chemoradiation proved to be the most significant factor for staging inaccuracy (p<0.0002). When excluding all patients having undergone chemoradiation, the accuracy for staging of the T classification rose to 76%. A major problem of endosonography in this second series was overstaging; the T category was overestimated in 76 cases (22.9% of patients). The main error here was overstaging of adenomas as cancerous lesions (45.5% of all adenomas) and T2-cancers asmore advanced cancers (42.2% of all T2-cancers). When excluding the adenomas from this analysis, the accuracy increased to 73.5%. Accuracy for staging of the N classification was 76% in the first series versus 71% in the second series. Status post-chemoradiation again was a relevant factor (p<0.0003); when excluding these patients the accuracy increased to 73%. The accuracy of endosonography for rectal tumours decreases after introduction of the method into the everyday clinical routine. Nonetheless, apart from magnetic resonance imaging with an endorectal coil, rectal endosonography is still the most accurate staging modality for rectal tumours and allows adequate selection of patients for different therapeutic regimes. As the major problem of rectal endosonography is overstaging, more patients are likely to undergo overtreatment rather than undertreatment. Endosonography is inaccurate in staging patients having undergone chemoradiation.

[Initial staging of rectal cancer]

Current trends in staging rectal cancer

The Accuracy of Computed Tomography in the Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer.

Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer

Anatomic Basis of Rectal Cancer Staging: Clarifying Controversies and Misconceptions

Current imaging of rectal cancer

[Radiological diagnostics and follow-up of rectal carcinoma]

[Evaluation of the Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging].

Improving staging of rectal cancer in the pelvis: the role of PET/MRI

The Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Endorectal Ultrasound for the Accurate Preoperative T-staging of Rectal Cancer

Initial M Staging of Rectal Cancer: FDG PET/MRI with a Hepatocyte-specific Contrast Agent versus Contrast-enhanced CT

Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI

Low Rectal Cancers at Initial Staging MRI

Early rectal cancer: The diagnostic performance of MRI supplemented with a rectal micro-enema and a modified staging system to identify tumors eligible for local excision

Imaging of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Survey Results and Expert Opinion from the Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology

Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?

Restaging magnetic resonance imaging of the rectum after neoadjuvant therapy: a practical guide

Preoperative assessment of rectal cancer stage: state of the art

The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation

Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery

Diagnostics of Rectal Cancer: Endorectal Ultrasound