Abstract:We evaluate Quantile Mapping (QM) and Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) for postprocessing daily precipitation ensemble forecasts over India from the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting. EMOS improves most aspects of the forecasts while QM does not. The figure shows the Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score (CRPSS) for (d) climatological, (e) QM‐postprocessed and (f) EMOS‐postprocessed forecasts during the 2018 to 2022 monsoon seasons. Positive (negative) values indicate better (worse) performance than the original forecasts. Accurate ensemble forecasts of heavy precipitation in India are vital for many applications and essential for early warning of damaging flood events, especially during the monsoon season. In this study we investigate to what extent Quantile Mapping (QM) and Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) statistical postprocessing reduce errors in precipitation ensemble forecasts over India, in particular for heavy precipitation. Both methods are applied to day‐1 forecasts at 12‐km resolution from the 23‐member National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF) global ensemble prediction system (NEPS‐G). By construction, QM leads to distributions close to the observed ones, while EMOS optimizes the ensemble spread, and it is not a priori clear which is better suited for practical applications. The methods are therefore compared with respect to several key aspects of the forecasts: local distributions, ensemble spread, and skill for forecasting precipitation amounts and the exceedance of heavy‐precipitation thresholds. The evaluation includes rank histograms, Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Scores (CRPSS), Brier Skill Scores (BSS), reliability diagrams, and receiver operating characteristic. EMOS performs best not only with respect to correcting under‐ or overdispersive ensembles, but also in terms of forecast skill for precipitation amounts and heavy precipitation events, with positive CRPSS and BSS in most regions (both up to about 0.4 in some areas), while QM in many regions performs worse than the raw forecast. QM performs best with respect to the overall local precipitation distributions. Which aspects of the forecasts are most relevant depends to some extent on how the forecasts are used. If the main criteria are the correction of under‐ or overdispersion, forecast reliability, match between the forecasted distribution for individual days and observations (CRPSS), and the skill in forecasting heavy‐precipitation events (BSS), then EMOS is the better choice for postprocessing NEPS‐G forecasts for short lead times.

Performance evaluation and verification of post-processing methods for TIGGE ensemble data using machine learning approaches

Post-processing of numerical precipitation forecast based on spatial-temporal deep learning model

Evaluation of TIGGE Daily Accumulated Precipitation Forecasts over the Qu River Basin, China

Ensemble solar forecasting using data-driven models with probabilistic post-processing through GAMLSS

Improving multiple model ensemble predictions of daily precipitation and temperature through machine learning techniques

From research to applications – Examples of operational ensemble post-processing in France using machine learning

A Machine Learning Outlook: Post-processing of Global Medium-range Forecasts

A comparison of two statistical postprocessing methods for heavy‐precipitation forecasts over India during the summer monsoon

Statistical post-processing of multiple meteorological elements using the multimodel integration embedded method

Machine learning for total cloud cover prediction

Improving categorical and continuous accuracy of precipitation forecasts by integrating Empirical Quantile Mapping and Bernoulli-Gamma-Gaussian distribution

Post-processing multi-ensemble temperature and precipitation forecasts through an Exchangeable Gamma Normal model and its Tobit extension

Deep Learning for Post-Processing Ensemble Weather Forecasts

Evaluating Ensemble Post-Processing for Wind Power Forecasts

Machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts: A systematic comparison

Parametric post-processing of dual-resolution precipitation forecasts

Machine learning for postprocessing ensemble streamflow forecasts

Postprocessing of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasts based on multisource precipitation in Ganjiang River basin, China

Evaluation of TIGGE ensemble predictions of Northern Hemisphere summer precipitation during 2008–2012

Machine learning for precipitation forecasts post-processing — Multi-model comparison and experimental investigation

A trial of ensemble flood simulation experiment based upon TIGGE data with a coupled atmosphere-hydrology model