Abstract:Information stored in the memory system can affect visual search process. Foreknowing features of distractors could facilitate target selection. Previous studies found that after sufficient practice, participants learned to ignore fixed feature representations in working memory (WM) when they reappeared as distractors. However, varied WM representations would automatically capture attention, suggesting that we could not voluntarily inhibit varied WM representations. Current studies investigated whether active-maintained varied representations could be suppressed as those fixed representations. In study 1, participants were requested to find a specific shape (target) in the search array and indicate the location of a dot inside the target. The fixed color-cue in each trial indicated that target would not be among shapes in the cued color. Meanwhile, there was a constant color, which would never be the target (and never appeared as cue color) during the entire experiment. In negative-cue condition, distractor color in search array was the cue color, while the target color was randomly selected. In constant color condition, distractor color was the constant color which was a long-term memory (LTM) representation. In neutral condition, both target color and distractor color were randomly selected with the restriction that they would never be the cue color nor the constant color. We found that, compared to neutral conditions, both fixed WM representations and LTM representations could facilitate visual search. In study 2, we varied the cue in each trial. Results showed that reaction time (RT) of negative-cue condition was significantly shorter than neutral condition when reaction speed was slow. Importantly, even in fast RT condition, there was no capture effect. In all, our results indicated that participants could voluntarily suppress both fixed and varied WM representations when they reappeared as distractors. However, facilitation of varied representation only happened when cognitive control process had sufficient time to execute.

More or less? Improving monocular head mounted display assisted visual search by reducing guidance precision

Effects of Location-based and Object-based Selective Attention in Visual Target Detection Tasks

Fast, Accurate, but Sometimes Too-Compelling Support: The Impact of Imperfectly Automated Cues in an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display on Visual Search Performance

Using Eye-Controlled Highlighting Techniques to Support Both Serial and Parallel Processing in Visual Search

Memory-based Attentional Guidance Facilitates Visual Search Through Distractor Suppression

Spatial Auditory Cueing for a Dynamic Three-Dimensional Virtual Reality Visual Search Task

Optimal Integration of Heading Specified by Optic Flow and Target Egocentric Direction

Intact Contextual Cueing for Search in Realistic Scenes with Simulated Central or Peripheral Vision Loss

Do Congruent Auditory Stimuli Facilitate Visual Search in Dynamic Environments? an Experimental Study Based on Multisensory Interaction.

Concurrent Crossmodal Feedback Assists Target-searching: Displaying Distance Information Through Visual, Auditory and Haptic Modalities

Eye and head movements in visual search in the extended field of view

First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning.

Effects of Prior Knowledge on Visual Search in Depth

Modeling peripheral vision for moving target search and detection

Evaluation of 3D Pointing Accuracy in the Fovea and Periphery in Immersive Head-Mounted Display Environments

Micropursuit and the control of attention and eye movements in dynamic environments

Visual search as an embodied process: The effects of perspective change and external reference on search performance

Establishing gaze markers of perceptual load during multi-target visual search

Knowing where to go: Spatial memory guides eye and body movements in a naturalistic visual search task

Eye-hand coordination in finding and touching a target among distractors

GuidingBand: Evaluating Speed, Precision and Accuracy of a Vibrotactile Hand Guidance System