ISOENZYMES IN THE HUMAN EPIDERMIS

G. Weber,G. Pfleiderer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1961.tb35585.x
IF: 6.499
1961-11-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:This account bf our examination of different molecular forms of lactic dehydrogenase, which we present as a preliminary report, does not serve the purpose of finding new diagnostic possibilities in dermatoses, but it has the aim of answering open and frequently problematic questions on the enzyme metabolism of the human skin. Substantially four problems are concerned and, because of the different character of each, they can be treated only independently. (1) Are the enzymes and enzyme systems found in the human epidermis produced by the cells of the epidermis themselves or do they diffuse from the blood vessels of the dermis into these cells? Weber and his co-workers could demonstrate'-8 by extensive bioenzymatical investigation that different metabolites and enzymes of the glycolysis-among them also the lactic dehydrogenase-are found in high concentration in the cells of the epidermis, and that these diminish continuously in the direction of the peripheral bloodstream (FIGURE 1). From this decrease of concentration Weber and his associates inferred that the enrichment of enzymes in the epidermis is caused by the production of enzymes in the cells of the epidermis, and not by diffusion from the bloodstream, which would tend to accentuate the concentration decrease. Although these results represent convincing arguments, definite proof for the correctness of this thesis was still lacking. This proof could be obtained by an electrophoretic determination of lactic dehydrogenase in a homogenate of the epidermis, of the dermis, and of erythrocytes which, according to Hess,14 contain the main portion of serum lactic dehydrogenase. As to method, we have followed Wieland et a1.12 As shown in FIGURE 2, there are such significant differences between the distribution patterns of lactic dehydrogenase in the epidermis and in the erythrocytes that from this fact alone the autochthonous production of lactic dehydrogenase in the cells of epidermis can be assumed with certainty. (2) Is there any difference between the molecular forms of lactic dehydrogenase in the epidermis and in the dermis? I t would be necessary first to find if the concentration of lactic dehydrogenase in the epidermis is much higher than in the dermis. Comparing the distribution patterns of this enzyme in both tissues (FIGURE 2), a distinct shift to the right results for the epidermis, that is, column S is accentuated, whereas the distribution pattern of enzyme in the dermis shows a shift to the left, that is, a more distinct accentuation to column 1. According to Pfleiderer and WachsmuthI3 the strictly anaerobic metabolizing tissues show a shift to the right, that is, the maxima are directed to column 5 , whereas the tissues that have a high oxygen consumption are characterized by a shift to the left: that is, by maxima directed to column 1. The conclusion i s that, in the case of cells of the epidermis, chiefly anaerobic metabolizing tissue is to be assumed: in the case of the cells of the dermis, a more aerobic metabolizing tissue is indicated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?