Bedside post-pyloric tube placement using direct visualisation in mechanically ventilated patients: A single centre case series

Terpsi Karpasiti,Stephen John Shepherd
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103222
Abstract:Introduction: Post-pyloric feeding tubes are used for intensive care patients unable to tolerate gastric feeding. The Kangaroo Feeding Tube with IRIS Technology ('IRIS') uses real-time visualisation of anatomical markers to guide bedside placement, however limited studies currently explore post-pyloric insertions in mechanically ventilated patients. We describe a case series of 'IRIS' post-pyloric placements performed by trained intensivists and dietitians. Methods: This was a prospective, single-centred clinical effectiveness study of mechanically ventilated adults referred for bedside post-pyloric tube placement between May 2020 and May 2021. The feasibility, success rates, anatomical visualisation using 'IRIS' and nutritional outcomes were documented. Results: Twelve patients were included in total. The primary indication for post-pyloric placement was gastric feeding intolerance, with a median of 3.5 (IQR 0-6) days with inadequate nutrition prior to placement. All tubes were inserted within 24 h of referral as there was always a trained clinician available. Post-pyloric placement was successful for 9/12 patients (75%), as identified on the 'IRIS' console and X-ray confirmation. Only 3 (25%) patients required parenteral nutrition (mean duration 4 [SD 1] days). Respiratory misplacement occurred in 1 patient (8%) and was clearly differentiated from gastrointestinal anatomy, permitting early removal. Although duodenal placement was possible, no tubes reached the jejunum solely using the 'IRIS' method. Conclusion: Post-pyloric tube placement using 'IRIS' in mechanically ventilated patients was feasible, successful and safe, resulting in reduced durations with inadequate enteral nutrition. Further, larger-scale studies are required to confirm these findings and explore the effectiveness of 'IRIS' in achieving deep small-intestinal placement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?