Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor in adults: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis and additional reports of 4 cases

Giuseppe Broggi,Francesca Gianno,Doron Theodore Shemy,Maura Massimino,Claudia Milanaccio,Angela Mastronuzzi,Sabrina Rossi,Antonietta Arcella,Felice Giangaspero,Manila Antonelli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-03959-z
Abstract:Introduction: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a highly aggressive embryonal CNS neoplasm, characterized by inactivation of SMARCB1 (INI1) or rarely of SMARCA4 (BRG1). While it is predominantly a childhood tumor, AT/RT is rare in adults. Methods: We provide a comprehensive systematic review of literature with meta-analysis; 92 adult cases were found from 74 articles. We additionally present 4 cases of adult AT/RTs (age ranging from 19 to 29 years), located to cerebellum in 2 cases, to ponto-cerebellar angle in 1 case and to spinal cord in the remaining case. Results: Microscopic features of our 4 cases showed a highly cellular tumor with rhabdoid morphology and high mitotic activity. All tumor cells lacked nuclear SMARCB1/INI1 protein expression. In case no. 3 we also performed methylation profiling which clustered the tumor with pediatric AT/RT-MYC subgroup. Prognosis remains poor in both pediatric and adult population with a median overall survival of 11 months. Our review demonstrated median overall survival of 15 months among the adult populations. However, consistent with a recent review, adult AT/RT seems to have highly variable prognosis and some patients reach long term survival with 22.9% of 5-year survival without evidence of disease and mean follow up time of 35.9 months (SD = 36.5). 27.1% of dissemination was also reported among the adult population. Conclusions: Adult AT/RTs predominantly arise in female patients and in supratentorial location. Midline structures, including the sellar region, are the most affected sites, especially among females aged > 40 years. Male gender is more prevalent between the age of 18 and 40 years and more frequently associated with non-midline tumors. Factors significantly associated with better prognosis are patient's age (< 40 years), combined radio-chemotherapy adjuvant approach and Ki-67 score < 40%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?