Abstract:Purpose: The objective of this work is to present a model-based approach with user-friendly tool support for facilitating the cancer registration process in Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN)[1]. Context: The CRN collects cancer patients’ information from different medical entities (e.g., clinic hospitals, pathology laboratories) and ensures the quality of collected cancer data [1, 2] so that the data can be used for medical research and statistics. Three key activities are performed in CRN: 1) Cancer Message Validation: check validity of collected cancer data (organized as cancer messages) 2) Cancer Message Aggregation: aggregate relevant cancer messages into a cancer case; and 3) Cancer Case Validation: check validity of aggregated cancer cases. All these activities require employing a large number of cancer coding rules. However, the existing rules are scattered, represented and applied in several ways, e.g., applications, database and look-up tables, which present big challenges for maintaining and updating these rules. Methods: This work presents a model-based approach with tool support for facilitating the process of the above-mentioned activities in a systematic and automated way [3]. More specifically, our approach 1) employs Unified Modeling Language (UML) [2] to systematically capture the domain knowledge of CRN (e.g., cancer messages, cancer cases and cancer coding rules); 2) uses Object Constraint Language (OCL)[3] to formally specify cancer coding rules as constraints and 3) associates tags to each constraint to map with corresponding elements of UML models to enable automated selection of rules. Based on the approach, we designed and implemented a tool named GURI which can support 1) an automated process for validation and aggregation of cancer messages, and validation of cancer cases; 2) result checking for validation and aggregation with a user-friendly front-end; and 3) systematically management and maintenance of a large number of cancer coding rules. Results and discussion: We evaluated our approach with GURI using a case study that consists of 287 cancer coding rules, 42 cancer messages and 28 cancer cases. The results show that our approach has a good capability for reducing the maintenance effort of cancer coding rules with an acceptable performance. Thus, the current process of cancer registration in CRN can be facilitated with our approach in a systematic and automated manner. References:Larsen I K, Småstuen M, et al. (2009) Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. European Journal of Cancer, 2009, 45, (7), pp. 1218-1231.Ferlay J, Burkhard C, et al. (2005) Check and conversion programs for cancer registries. International Agency for Research on Cancer.Wang S, Lu H, Yue T, Ali S and Nygård J F. MBF4CR: A Model-Based Framework for Supporting An Automated Cancer Registry System. In the 12th European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications (ECMFA), pp. 191-204, 2016.[1] Cancer Registry of Norway: http://www.kreftregisteret.no[2] Unified Modeling Language (UML), http://www.uml.org/ [3] Object Management Group (OMG), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2/

A multipurpose TNM stage ontology for cancer registries

The Lymph node ratio optimizes staging in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

HeNeCOn: An ontology for integrative research in Head and Neck cancer

A Modified Tumor-Node-Metastasis Classification for Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer

Web-based interactive mapping from data dictionaries to ontologies, with an application to cancer registry

Staging colorectal cancer with the TNM 7(th): the presumption of innocence when applying the M category

Analysis and visualization of disease courses in a semantically-enabled cancer registry

Knowledge Integration for Disease Characterization: A Breast Cancer Example

Multicenter Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) for Gastric Cancer: Proposal for a Simplified and Improved TNM Staging System

A Model-Based Approach with Tool Support to Facilitate the Cancer Registration Process in Cancer Registry of Norway

Generalizable and automated classification of TNM stage from pathology reports with external validation

Ontology-Based AI Design Patterns and Constraints in Cancer Registry Data Validation

The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM

Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the “N” parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study

Proposal for a New TNM Stage Based on the 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer Ptnm Staging Classification for Gastric Cancer

A novel TNM staging system for gastric cancer based on the metro-ticket paradigm: a comparative study with the AJCC-TNM staging system

Mapping the Oncological Basis Dataset to the Standardized Vocabularies of a Common Data Model: A Feasibility Study

Development and validation of a novel TNM staging N‐classification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Software-assisted structured reporting and semi-automated TNM classification for NSCLC staging in a multicenter proof of concept study

Overview of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project for Lung Cancer: Proposals for the Revision of the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Ninth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer