Abandoning fibrocystic disease of the breast: timely end of an era.

J. Devitt

Abstract:C linicians have labelled women who have lumpy, sore or discharging breasts with the scientific sounding name "fibrocystic disease". Radiologists observing certain radiodensities that are seen in almost all women in the reproductive years have labelled these images with the same term. Pathologists who examine a breast biopsy specimen and find macrocysts, microcysts, adenosis, apocrine changes, fibrosis, fibroadenomas or ductal hyperplasia abnormalities that all such specimens have to some extent also label the patient as having fibrocystic disease. Each discipline rarely appreciates how poorly its fibrocystic disease correlates with those of the other specialties. Indeed, it is questionable whether findings so frequently observed should be considered to be disease. At least 50% of women will report breast lumpiness or pain to a doctor some time in their lives.12 Careful palpation will reveal at least a little lumpiness or nodularity in any breast at any age, and there is considerable diffuse nodularity (the extent depending on the degree of obesity) in the breasts of most adult women with ovarian cycles.3 Up to 90% of breasts that have been autopsied show histologic evidence of fibrocystic disease.36 Indeed, the finding of fibrocystic disease, whether clinical, radiologic or histologic, depends as much on the assiduity of the examiner as on the state of the breast. Because of the convenient and almost universal presence of the features of fibrocystic disease the diagnosis of "normal breasts" is rare in clinical, radiologic and surgical pathology reports.2 It seems to be forgotten that breasts are end-organs made up of ducts, lobules, connective tissue, fat, and blood and lymphatic vessels, all of which react, particularly in the reproductive years, to a constantly changing hormonal milieu.3,78 During the growth phase of the cycle all segments of the breasts do not grow uniformly; similarly, during the involution phase all segments do not regress equally. When one adds the variations that