The Role Conflicts Between Hosts and Guests in Home Space in Ethnic Areas, Lijiang, China
Zhang Ji,Xu Honggang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.07.012
2016-01-01
Abstract:As the core of ethnic tourism, the cultural interaction between local residents and tourists in ethnic tourism has been paid little attention in Chinese academic research. And the previous studies on China's ethnic communication did not involve the new ethnic exchanges promoted by ethnic tourism under the background of mass tourism. Therefore, to study the role conflicts presented in the process of cultural interaction between lo-cals and tourists not only can help to deepen ethnic tourism research, but also can extend the field of ethnic communication studies. This article, by referring to the theory of role and role conflict from the symbolic inter-actionism, takes three locals’households in Baisha Village, Lijiang, China as the micro research sites to con-duct a qualitative research on role conflicts between local minority residents and Han tourists at individual lev-el. Its findings show that multiple role conflict phenomena often take place in the interactive processes be-tween the locals and Han tourists. While interacting with tourists, the local residents, on the one hand, intend to get economic interests from tourists by their role playing of“businessman”, and on the other hand, they have to emphasize their other two roles which are the“host”and“minority”. Specifically, the locals try to treat the tourists warmly with their role of“host”in their home space, while to protect their heritage and culture with the role of“minority”. As a result, they can maintain the advantages in the competitive market through per-forming their own authentic culture. Tourists also involve the intrarole conflicts between the role of“guest”and“customer”. Meanwhile, there are two interrole conflicts between the local residents and tourists, which are the interrole conflict between the tourist’s“customer”role and the local resident’s“host”role, as well as the interrole conflict between the local resident’s“businessman”role and tourist’s“guest”role. These phe-nomena reflect not only the locals’pursuit of economic interests, but also the status and power relationships between locals and tourists while interacting with each other. Besides, in terms of theoretical contribution, this study not only enriches the host-guest interaction theory in tourism anthropology by examining the influence of micro space on role interactive process, but also make up for the deficiency of human geography in micro space research and tourism sociology in the aspect of space-power research.