A pilot randomised controlled trial of an energy management programme for adults on maintenance haemodialysis: the fatigue-HD study

Janine F Farragher,Pietro Ravani,Braden Manns,Meghan Elliott,Chandra Thomas,Maoliosa Donald,Nancy Verdin,Brenda R Hemmelgarn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051475
IF: 3.006
2022-02-10
BMJ Open
Abstract:Background: Identifying interventions to reduce fatigue and improve life participation are top research priorities of people on maintenance haemodialysis. Objective: Our primary objective was to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of an energy management programme for people on maintenance haemodialysis. Design: Parallel-arm, 1:1, blinded, pilot randomised controlled trial. Participants: Participants were recruited from 6 dialysis units in Calgary, Canada. Eligible patients were on maintenance haemodialysis, clinically stable and reported disabling fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale items 5, 7, 8 and 9. Randomisation: Participants were randomised using a computer-generated random number sequence according to permuted blocked randomisation, stratified by dialysis unit. Blinding: Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. Interventions: Participants received an attention control (general disease self-management education) or the Personal Energy Planning (PEP) programme, a tailored, web-supported 7-9 weeks energy management programme. Outcomes: Eligibility, recruitment and attrition rates were recorded, and standardised intervention effects (Hedge's G) were calculated for fatigue and life participation questionnaires at one1-week postintervention and 12-week postintervention. Results: 159 of 253 screened patients were eligible to be approached. 42 (26%) had fatigue, were interested and consented to participate, of whom 30 met eligibility criteria and were randomised (mean age 62.4 years (±14.7), 60% male). 22 enrolled participants (73%) completed all study procedures. Medium-sized intervention effects were observed on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)-Performance Scale, Global Life Participation Scale and Global Life Participation Satisfaction Scale at 1-week postintervention follow-up, compared with control. At 12-week follow-up, large and very large intervention effects were observed on the COPM-Performance Scale and COPM-Satisfaction Scale, respectively. Conclusion: It is feasible to enrol and follow patients on haemodialysis in a randomised controlled trial of an energy management intervention. As the intervention was associated with improved life participation on some measures, a larger trial is justified.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?