Accidental cardiopulmonary arrest following magnesium sulphate overdose.

D. Rabinerson,A. Gruber,B. Kaplan,M. Royburt,J. Ovadia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(94)90071-X

1994-06-15

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Assessing impacts of COVID-19 and their responses among smallholder farmers in Brazil, Madagascar and Tanzania

Katharina Löhr,Paschal Mugabe,Ana Paula Dias Turetta,Jonathan Steinke,Camilo Lozano,Michelle Bonatti,Luca Eufemia,Larissa Hery Ito,Alexandra Konzack,Stefan Kroll,Charles Peter Mgeni,Dina Ramanank' Andrasana,Sophia Tadesse,Masoud Yazdanpanah,Stefan Sieber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270221127717

Abstract:This study investigates the impacts of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on smallholder farmers and their coping strategies in three contrasting Low- and Middle-Income Countries. The case studies include Brazil (South region), Madagascar (Atsimo Atsinanana region), and Tanzania (Morogoro/Eastern Tanzania). These countries were chosen because i) the economies are strongly influenced by the agricultural sector; ii) their national food security is strongly affected by smallholder production, and, iii) they represent a set of contrasting government responses to COVID-19 including the denial of the pandemic. Data were collected through semi-structured household interviews in all three countries in rural areas. COVID-19 induced effects were found in all three countries, including in Brazil and Tanzania where both national governments initially neglected the existence of COVID-19 and introduced few containment measures only. Here, mobility and trade restrictions of other countries impact also on agricultural trade and production in countries in which governments took less action to COVID-19 and also people remained home and practiced social distancing even if no official government policy was issued. The findings in all three countries suggest that the COVID-19 crisis had negatively affected smallholders' agricultural production, leading to a vicious cycle of low production, low incomes, and higher food insecurity. Results of this study raise the thorny issue of how best to balance containment of pandemic and future shocks against the well-being of the vulnerable rural population in lower- and middle-income countries; especially considering also the degree of global interconnected and the potential of polices to effect people beyond the national scale.
Perception and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among smallholder farmers in eastern Ethiopia

Muluken Gezahegn Wordofa,Getachew Shambel Endris,Chanyalew Seyoum Aweke,Jemal Y. Hassen,Jeylan Woliye,Awol Seid,Elyas Ahmed,Hakim Hashim,Eric Ndemo Okoyo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2209369

2023-05-10

Cogent Social Sciences

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of human life. Its effect was particularly severe in sectors that are directly related to agricultural production and food security. This research was conducted to uncover the perception of smallholder farmers in eastern Ethiopia about the pandemic, prevention and control measures, and its impact on their livelihood. Through a semi-structured interview schedule conducted on 176 randomly selected rural households, we found a varying level of practicing the recommended COVID-19 prevention and control measures. The study also found that the response of the media, family members and religious organizations to the pandemic was rated as "very good". The most important impact of the pandemic was associated with household's inability to obtain a reasonable price for their agricultural produce, and inability to attend religious gatherings/prayers. Other impacts of the pandemic were fear of losing friends and getting sick/losing life. Considering the increasing number of COVID-19 cases, a reinforced awareness creation campaign, behaviour change communication by extension workers, and continued provision of basic health and sanitation facilities was recommended. Such interventions should focus on improving the access of smallholders to Personal Protective Equipments (PPEs). Continued engagement with diverse media platforms and developing trust is also needed to increase the spread of reliable COVID-19 related information. Moreover, safeguarding the agricultural sector against risks and uncertainties has to be prioritized through strengthening early warning system, distributing improved/early-maturing seeds and fertilizers, providing insecticides/pesticides, linking smallholders to market outlets, and emergency food aid via the Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP).
Governing COVID-19: analyzing the effects of policy responses on food systems in Tanzania

Paschal A Mugabe,Theresa M Renkamp,Constance Rybak,Hadija Mbwana,Chris Gordon,Stefan Sieber,Katharina Löhr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00383-4

Abstract:Background: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic increased debates on global public health concerns. From early 2020 to 2022, globally, life was upended in the wake of the pandemic. Industries of all kinds were forced to rapidly changed how they work, including agriculture. Particularly for smallholder farmers in developing countries, the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with climate change effects, negatively affected their livelihoods. Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 is unrealistic if immediate efforts are not made to address the existential threats facing smallholder farmers. This study analyzes COVID-19 governance and policy responses, examining its effects on smallholder farmers in the south and east of Tanzania using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Results: Findings show that mobility restrictions imposed by other countries and fears of the Tanzanian people leading to voluntary isolation resulted in an amended structure of farmers' markets: Reductions in exports, imports and in the purchasing power of the local people followed. Food security was diminished as food availability on the market level was reduced due to mobility restrictions. The impact of COVID-19 resulted in more than 85% of smallholder farmers experiencing an income reduction, thus also increasing the pre-existing vulnerability of these communities. Findings show that farms producing non-exported crops had less severe income reductions and could cope better. The results indicate that only 20% of smallholder farmers started using digital information technology to gather information since physical movements were restricted. Access to technology remained limited in rural areas. Even during the COVID-19 crises, farmers' concerns about the vulnerability of their food systems include non-COVID-19 causes, such as climate change. Conclusions: Although Tanzania did not impose a total lockdown, the country was affected by COVID-19, partly via policies of other countries. Impacts included: (i) a decline in local markets as smallholder farmers had fewer trading partners from neighboring states; (ii) a loss of employment opportunities due to the absence of both local and external trade; (iii) reductions of farm output and income; (iv) a lack of agricultural inputs (fertilizer etc.) that are usually imported; (v) fear to continue farming activities due to news about COVID-19 spreading; and (vi) reduction of work efficiency because of a lack of social gathering due to voluntary isolation.While COVID-19 compelled policymakers to make urgent decisions to ensure stable food supply chains, the fundamental task is to address these immediate disruptions while also investing in the long-term goal of a resilient, sustainable, and productive global food system. This can be achieved by adopting a policy package that includes investments in technological development, access to small long-term loans, and regulatory reforms, with which governments can create conditions supporting productive, sustainable, and resilient food systems that can withstand future shocks.
Food system disruption: initial livelihood and dietary effects of COVID-19 on vegetable producers in India

Jody Harris,Lutz Depenbusch,Arshad Ahmad Pal,Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair,Srinivasan Ramasamy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01064-5

2020-07-14

Food Security

Abstract:Abstract Disruption to food systems and impacts on livelihoods and diets have been brought into sharp focus by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to investigate effects of this multi-layered shock on production, sales, prices, incomes and diets for vegetable farmers in India as both producers and consumers of nutrient-dense foods. We undertook a rapid telephone survey with 448 farmers in 4 states, in one of the first studies to document the early impacts of the pandemic and policy responses on farming households. We find that a majority of farmers report negative impacts on production, sales, prices and incomes. Over 80% of farms reported some decline in sales, and over 20% of farms reported devastating declines (sold almost nothing). Price reductions were reported by over 80% of farmers, and reductions by more than half for 50% of farmers. Similarly, farm income reportedly dropped for 90% of farms, and by more than half for 60%. Of surveyed households, 62% reported disruptions to their diets. A majority of farm households reported reduced ability to access the most nutrient-dense foods. Around 80% of households reported ability to protect their staple food consumption, and the largest falls in consumption were in fruit and animal source foods other than dairy, in around half of households. Reported vegetable consumption fell in almost 30% of households, but vegetables were also the only food group where consumption increased for some, in around 15% of households. Our data suggest higher vulnerability of female farmers in terms of both livelihoods and diet, and differential effects on smaller and larger farms, meaning different farms may require different types of support in order to continue to function. Farms reported diverse coping strategies to maintain sales, though often with negative implications for reported incomes. The ability to consume one’s own produce may be somewhat protective of diets when other routes to food access fail. The impacts of COVID-19 and subsequent policy responses on both livelihoods and diets in horticultural households risk rolling back the impressive economic and nutrition gains India has seen over the past decade. Food systems, and particularly those making available the most nutrient-dense foods, must be considered in ongoing and future government responses.

food science & technology
Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on vegetable production systems and livelihoods: Smallholder farmer experiences in Burkina Faso

B. Jan Middendorf,Hamidou Traoré,Gerad Middendorf,Prakash K. Jha,Djibril Yonli,Siébou Palé,P.V. Vara Prasad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.337

2021-10-31

Food and Energy Security

Abstract:At the onset of COVID-19, researchers quickly recognized the need for research on the consequences of the pandemic for agricultural and food systems, both in terms of immediate impacts on access to inputs and labor, disruptions in transportation and markets, and the longer-term implications on crop productivity, income, and livelihoods. Vegetable production and supply chains are particularly vulnerable due to the perishable nature of the products and labor-intensive production practices. The purpose of this study was to understand the impacts of COVID-19 on vegetable production in Burkina Faso in terms of both the biophysical aspects such as yields and access to inputs and socioeconomic aspects such as access to labor, markets, and social services. A survey was developed to better understand smallholder farmer experiences regarding the impacts of COVID-19 on their vegetable production systems and social well-being. The survey was administered (between August and October 2020) with smallholder farmers (<i>n</i> = 605) in 13 administrative regions covering all agroecological zones of Burkina Faso. The survey results clearly show impacts of COVID-19 on vegetable systems, including a reduction in access to inputs, a reduction in yields, a loss of income, reduced access to local and urban markets, reduced access to transportation, and an increase in post-harvest loss. Market access, distribution, and disruptions were a major shock to the system. Results also showed an increase in women's labor in the household, and for youth, an increase in unemployment, job loss, and concerns of poverty. Finally, food security and social supports were highlighted as major issues for resilience and livelihoods. The results from this survey should be helpful to policymakers and researchers to develop policies and strategies to minimize the negative impacts of this ongoing pandemic on the agri-food systems and support smallholder farmers to overcome stress caused by COVID-19.

food science & technology
Impacts of a national lockdown on smallholder farmers’ income and food security: Empirical evidence from two states in India

Francisco Ceballos,Samyuktha Kannan,Berber Kramer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105069

IF: 6.678

2020-12-01

World Development

Abstract:In early 2020, the unprecedented nature of COVID-19 prompted India, among many other countries, to put in place stark measures to stem the virus' spread and the cost of human lives. We analyze data from phone-based surveys on disruptions to agricultural production and food security, administered with 1515 smallholder producers in the states of Haryana and Odisha. We find substantial heterogeneity in how the lockdown affected farmers in these two states, which is likely related to existing structural differences in market infrastructure and to differences in state-specific COVID-related policies. In Odisha, where mechanization is limited, farmers spent more on labor to harvest their crops, and distress selling was more prevalent due to the absence of a well-functioning procurement system for their crops. In Haryana, preexisting market infrastructure allowed the state to sustain procurement at stable prices, limiting impacts on smallholder production. As consumers, farmers in Haryana faced more disruptions than those in Odisha, due to reduced availability of foods in the markets, whereas farmers in Odisha benefited from more diverse cropping patterns and increased local supply of foods following transport restrictions.

economics,development studies
Glutamine Prevents Late-Phase Anaphylaxis via MAPK Phosphatase 1-Dependent Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 Deactivation

Hae-Kyoung Kim,C. Song,Y. Bae,S. Im,H. Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000452103

2016-11-01

International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

Abstract:Background: Cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) plays a key role in the development of late-phase anaphylaxis. L-Glutamine (Gln), a nonessential amino acid, has anti-inflammatory activity via inhibiting cPLA2. Methods: We used a penicillin-induced murine model of anaphylaxis, and late-phase anaphylaxis was quantified by measuring the increase in the hematocrit (Ht) value. Various inhibitors, small interfering RNA, and knockout mice were used in inhibition experiments. Phosphorylation and protein expression of cPLA2, ERK, and MAPK phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) were detected by Western blotting. Results: Leukotriene (LT) B4 was found to be another potent inducer of late-phase anaphylaxis besides the known mediator platelet-activating-factor (PAF). Gln efficiently prevented late-phase anaphylaxis when it was administered up to 3 h after challenge injection via inhibiting cPLA2. Inhibition studies indicated that p38 MAPK was the major upstream regulator of cPLA2. Gln dephosphorylated p38 and cPLA2 via up-regulating the negative regulator of p38 MAPK, i.e., MKP-1 protein. MKP-1 blockade abrogated all the effects of Gln. Conclusion: Of the cPLA2 metabolites, PAF and LTB4 play a key role in the development of late-phase anaphylaxis, and Gln prevents the reaction via MKP-1-dependent deactivation of cPLA2.
Studies on oestrogens in cattle: oestrogen conversions in different tissues grown in vitro.

S. Erichsen,W. Velle

1960-05-01

Acta Endocrinologica

Abstract:
Can Concepts Reveal Criminals?

P. Elzinga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29892-9_3

2012-05-07

Abstract:
Immediate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on farming systems in Central America and Mexico

Santiago Lopez-Ridaura,Arie Sanders,Luis Barba-Escoto,Jennifer Wiegel,Maria Mayorga-Cortes,Carlos Gonzalez-Esquivel,Martin A Lopez-Ramirez,Rene M Escoto-Masis,Edmundo Morales-Galindo,Tomas S García-Barcena

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103178

Abstract:Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all sectors and human activities around the World. Objective: In this article we present a first attempt to understand the immediate impact of COVID-19 and the sanitary measures taken by governments on farming systems in Central America and Mexico (CAM). Methods: Through a review of information generated in these initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic (webinars, blogs, electronic publications, media) and 44 interviews with key informants across the region, we have identified the main impacts felt by different types of farming systems in the region. Results and conclusions: From corporate agricultural production systems, to small and medium scale entrepreneurs and smallholder subsistence farm households, all types of farming systems were impacted, more or less severely, by the different measures implemented by governments such as reduced mobility, closure of public and private venues and restrictions in borders. Larger corporate farming systems with vertical market integration and high level of control or coordination within the supply chain, and smallholder or subsistence farming systems with important focus on production for self-consumption and little external input use, were both relatively less impacted and showed greater adaptive capacity than the medium and small entrepreneurial farming systems dependent on agriculture as their primary income and with less control over the upstream and downstream parts of their supply chain. All types of farming systems implemented a series of mechanisms to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic including the development of alternative value chains, food and agricultural products delivery systems and the exponential use of digital means to communicate and maintain the viability of the different agricultural systems. Collective action and organization of farmers also proved to be an important coping mechanism that allowed some farmers to acquire inputs and deliver outputs in the context of restricted mobility, price volatility, and general uncertainty. Some features of the CAM region played an important role in mediating the impact of COVID-19 and associated sanitary measures. We identify as particularly relevant the nature of agricultural exports, the current structure of the agricultural sector, the diversified livelihood strategies of rural households, and the importance of mobility for rural livelihoods. Significance: The results presented focus only in the immediate effect of COVID-19 pandemic and the mechanisms implemented by farmers in the first months. Whether these impacts and response mechanisms will result in a transformation of the farming systems towards greater resilience and sustainability is still an open question.
The impact of COVID-19 on diet quality, food security and nutrition in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the evidence

Fiorella Picchioni,Dominique Roberfroid,Luis F. Goulao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.015

IF: 7.643

2021-08-01

Clinical Nutrition

Abstract:BACKGROUND & AIMS: <AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND &amp; AIMS">The current global pandemic of Coronavirus (COVID-19), and measures adopted to reduce its spread, threaten the nutritional status of populations in Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Documenting how the COVID-19 affects diets, nutrition and food security can help generating evidence-informed recommendations for mitigating interventions and policies.</AbstractText>METHODS: <AbstractText Label="METHODS">We carried out a systematic literature review. A structured search strategy was applied in MEDLINE (Pubmed®), EMBASE®, Scopus® and Web of Science®. Grey literature was retrieved by screening a pre-set list of institutions involved in monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nutrition and food security. The first search was done on 20th August 2020, and updated in mid-November 2020 and mid-January 2021. All research steps were described as recommended in the PRISMA statement.</AbstractText>RESULTS: <AbstractText Label="RESULTS">Out of the 2085 references identified, thirty-five primary studies were included. In spite of their heterogeneity, studies converge to demonstrate a detrimental effect of COVID-19 pandemic and associated containment measures on diet quality and food insecurity. One of the major direct effects of COVID-19 on food and nutrition outcomes has been through its impact on employment, income generating activities and associated purchasing power. Other channels of impact, such as physical access, availability and affordability of food provided a heterogeneous picture and were assessed via binary and often simplistic questions. The impacts of COVID-19 on food systems and diets manifested with various intensity degrees, duration and in different forms. Factors contributing to these variations between and within countries were: 1) timing, duration and stringency of national COVID-19 restriction measures and policies to mitigate their adverse impacts; 2) context specific food value chain responses to domestic and international containment measures; 3) differentiated impacts of restriction measures on different groups, along lines of gender, age, socio-economic status and employment conditions. Shorter value chains and traditional smallholder farms were somewhat more resilient in the face of COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the impact of the pandemic has been particularly adverse on women, individuals with a low socio-economic status, informal workers and young adults that relied on daily wages. Finally, there were heterogeneous government responses to curb the virus and to mitigate the damaging effects of the pandemic. It has been demonstrated that existing and well-functioning social protection programmes and public distribution of food can buffer the adverse effects on food insecurity. But social safety nets cannot be effective on their own and there is a need for broader food systems interventions and investments to support sustainable and inclusive food systems to holistically achieve food and nutrition security.</AbstractText>CONCLUSION: <AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION">The current economic and heath crisis impacted diet quality and food security. This raises concerns about long term impacts on access to and affordability of nutrient-rich, healthy diets and their health implications. Women and individuals with a low socio-economic are likely to be the most at risk of food insecurity. Social safety nets can be effective to protect them and must be urgently implemented. We advocate for improved data collection to identify vulnerable groups and measure how interventions are successful in protecting them.</AbstractText>

nutrition & dietetics
Food availability, accessibility and dietary practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country survey

Ali Jafri,Nonsikelelo Mathe,Elom K Aglago,Silvenus O Konyole,Moussa Ouedraogo,Keiron Audain,Urbain Zongo,Amos K Laar,Jeffrey Johnson,Dia Sanou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021000987

2021-05-04

Public Health Nutrition

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the perceived effects of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown measures on food availability, accessibility, dietary practices and strategies used by participants to cope with these measures. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional multi-country online survey between May and July 2020. We used a study-specific questionnaire mainly based on the adaptation of questions to assess food security and coping strategies from the World Food Programme's 'Emergency Food Security Assessment' and 'The Coping Strategy Index'. Setting: The questionnaire was hosted online using Google Forms and shared using social media platforms. Participants: A total of 1075 adult participants from eighty-two countries completed the questionnaire. Results: As a prelude to COVID-19 lockdowns, 62·7 % of the participants reported to have stockpiled food, mainly cereals (59·5 % of the respondents) and legumes (48·8 %). An increase in the prices of staples, such as cereals and legumes, was widely reported. Price increases have been identified as an obstacle to food acquisition by 32·7 % of participants. Participants reported having lesser variety (50·4 %), quality (30·2 %) and quantity (39·2 %) of foods, with disparities across regions. Vulnerable groups were reported to be facing some struggle to acquire adequate food, especially people with chronic diseases (20·2 %), the elderly (17·3 %) and children (14·5 %). To cope with the situation, participants mostly relied on less preferred foods (49 %), reduced portion sizes (30 %) and/or reduced the number of meals (25·7 %). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted food accessibility and availability, altered dietary practices and worsened the food insecurity situation, particularly in the most fragile regions.

public, environmental & occupational health,nutrition & dietetics
COVID-19 and its effects on food producers: panel data evidence from Burkina Faso

Thomas Druetz,Sara Brenes-Garita,Frank Bicaba,Cheick Tiendrebeogo,Abel Bicaba

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00942-x

2024-10-08

Abstract:Introduction: Burkina Faso implemented stringent measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that profoundly affected its economy and might have exacerbated food insecurity. While prior studies have assessed the impact of these measures on consumers, there is a dearth of evidence of its effects on food producers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims (i) to evaluate the repercussions of COVID-19 on the possession of food production assets and on the number of livestock owned; and (ii) to determine the correlation between the food insecurity experience scale (FIES) score, ownership of these assets, and the number of livestock owned. Methods: This study employs a pre-post comparison design in two panels of randomly selected households in Burkina Faso. While Panel A was constituted of 384 households predominantly (76%) living in rural areas, Panel B comprised 504 households, only half of which (51%) lived in rural areas. All households were visited twice: in July 2019 and February 2021, for Panel A, and in February 2020 and February 2021, for Panel B. Panel B was added to the study before the pandemic thanks to additional funding; the timing of the survey was harmonized in both panels for the second round. Regression models were used with fixed effects at the household level, controlling for potential time-invariant confounding variables, and correlation coefficients between possession of production assets or number of livestock and FIES score were measured. Results: Our findings indicate that the possession of some assets in Panel A (cart, livestock, bicycle, watch) was significantly reduced during the pandemic, as was the herd sizes among livestock-owning households in both panels. Households with fewer production assets and number of livestock were more likely to experience food insecurity. Conclusion: This study underscores the vulnerability of rural households in Burkina Faso to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing the challenges faced by farming and livestock-owning households is crucial for mitigating food insecurity and improving resilience in the face of ongoing crises.
Response and resilience of Asian agrifood systems to COVID-19: An assessment across twenty-five countries and four regional farming and food systems

John M Dixon,Jeevika Weerahewa,Jon Hellin,Maria Fay Rola-Rubzen,Jikun Huang,Shalander Kumar,Anup Das,Muhammad Ejaz Qureshi,Timothy J Krupnik,Kamil Shideed,Mangi L Jat,P V Vara Prasad,Sudhir Yadav,Aamer Irshad,Abdybek Asanaliev,Aigul Abugalieva,Aziz Karimov,Basundhara Bhattarai,Carol Q Balgos,Fred Benu,Hiroshi Ehara,Jharendu Pant,Jon M P Sarmiento,Jonathan C Newby,Jules Pretty,Hiromi Tokuda,Horst Weyerhaeuser,Larry N Digal,Lingling Li,Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar,Md Zihadul Abedin,Pepijn Schreinemachers,Quentin Grafton,Ram C Sharma,Saidjamol Saidzoda,Santiago Lopez-Ridaura,Shuan Coffey,Suan Pheng Kam,Su Su Win,Suwanna Praneetvatakul,Tek Maraseni,Van Touch,Wei-Li Liang,Yashpal Singh Saharawat,Jagadish Timsina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103168

Abstract:Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has been affecting health and economies across the world, although the nature of direct and indirect effects on Asian agrifood systems and food security has not yet been well understood. Objectives: This paper assesses the initial responses of major farming and food systems to COVID-19 in 25 Asian countries, and considers the implications for resilience, food and nutrition security and recovery policies by the governments. Methods: A conceptual systems model was specified including key pathways linking the direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 to the resilience and performance of the four principal Asian farming and food systems, viz, lowland rice based; irrigated wheat based; hill mixed; and dryland mixed systems. Based on this framework, a systematic survey of 2504 key informants (4% policy makers, 6% researchers or University staff, 6% extension workers, 65% farmers, and 19% others) in 20 Asian countries was conducted and the results assessed and analysed. Results and conclusion: The principal Asian farming and food systems were moderately resilient to COVID-19, reinforced by government policies in many countries that prioritized food availability and affordability. Rural livelihoods and food security were affected primarily because of disruptions to local labour markets (especially for off-farm work), farm produce markets (notably for perishable foods) and input supply chains (i.e., seeds and fertilisers). The overall effects on system performance were most severe in the irrigated wheat based system and least severe in the hill mixed system, associated in the latter case with greater resilience and diversification and less dependence on external inputs and long market chains. Farming and food systems' resilience and sustainability are critical considerations for recovery policies and programmes, especially in relation to economic performance that initially recovered more slowly than productivity, natural resources status and social capital. Overall, the resilience of Asian farming and food systems was strong because of inherent systems characteristics reinforced by public policies that prioritized staple food production and distribution as well as complementary welfare programmes. With the substantial risks to plant- and animal-sourced food supplies from future zoonoses and the institutional vulnerabilities revealed by COVID-19, efforts to improve resilience should be central to recovery programmes. Significance: This study was the first Asia-wide systems assessment of the effects of COVID-19 on agriculture and food systems, differentiating the effects of the pandemic across the four principal regional farming and food systems in the region.
COVID-19 and mental health in 8 low- and middle-income countries: A prospective cohort study

Nursena Aksunger,Corey Vernot,Rebecca Littman,Maarten Voors,Niccolò F Meriggi,Amanuel Abajobir,Bernd Beber,Katherine Dai,Dennis Egger,Asad Islam,Jocelyn Kelly,Arjun Kharel,Amani Matabaro,Andrés Moya,Pheliciah Mwachofi,Carolyn Nekesa,Eric Ochieng,Tabassum Rahman,Alexandra Scacco,Yvonne van Dalen,Michael Walker,Wendy Janssens,Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004081

2023-04-06

Abstract:Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and associated mitigation policies created a global economic and health crisis of unprecedented depth and scale, raising the estimated prevalence of depression by more than a quarter in high-income countries. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) suffered the negative effects on living standards the most severely. However, the consequences of the pandemic for mental health in LMICs have received less attention. Therefore, this study assesses the association between the COVID-19 crisis and mental health in 8 LMICs. Methods and findings: We conducted a prospective cohort study to examine the correlation between the COVID-19 pandemic and mental health in 10 populations from 8 LMICs in Asia, Africa, and South America. The analysis included 21,162 individuals (mean age 38.01 years, 64% female) who were interviewed at least once pre- as well as post-pandemic. The total number of survey waves ranged from 2 to 17 (mean 7.1). Our individual-level primary outcome measure was based on validated screening tools for depression and a weighted index of depression questions, dependent on the sample. Sample-specific estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between COVID-19 periods and mental health were estimated using linear regressions with individual fixed effects, controlling for independent time trends and seasonal variation in mental health where possible. In addition, a regression discontinuity design was used for the samples with multiple surveys conducted just before and after the onset of the pandemic. We aggregated sample-specific coefficients using a random-effects model, distinguishing between estimates for the short (0 to 4 months) and longer term (4+ months). The random-effects aggregation showed that depression symptoms are associated with a increase by 0.29 standard deviations (SDs) (95% CI [-.47, -.11], p-value = 0.002) in the 4 months following the onset of the pandemic. This change was equivalent to moving from the 50th to the 63rd percentile in our median sample. Although aggregate depression is correlated with a decline to 0.21 SD (95% CI [-0.07, -.34], p-value = 0.003) in the period thereafter, the average recovery of 0.07 SD (95% CI [-0.09, .22], p-value = 0.41) was not statistically significant. The observed trends were consistent across countries and robust to alternative specifications. Two limitations of our study are that not all samples are representative of the national population, and the mental health measures differ across samples. Conclusions: Controlling for seasonality, we documented a large, significant, negative association of the pandemic on mental health, especially during the early months of lockdown. The magnitude is comparable (but opposite) to the effects of cash transfers and multifaceted antipoverty programs on mental health in LMICs. Absent policy interventions, the pandemic could be associated with a lasting legacy of depression, particularly in settings with limited mental health support services, such as in many LMICs. We also demonstrated that mental health fluctuates with agricultural crop cycles, deteriorating during "lean", pre-harvest periods and recovering thereafter. Ignoring such seasonal variations in mental health may lead to unreliable inferences about the association between the pandemic and mental health.
Socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 in low-income countries

Anna Josephson,Talip Kilic,Jeffrey D. Michler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01096-7

IF: 24.252

2021-03-30

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and attempts to limit its spread have resulted in a contraction of the global economy. Here we document the socioeconomic impacts of the pandemic among households, adults and children in low-income countries. To do so, we rely on longitudinal household survey data from Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria and Uganda, originating from pre-COVID-19 face-to-face household surveys plus phone surveys implemented during the pandemic. We estimate that 256 million individuals—77% of the population—live in households that have lost income during the pandemic. Attempts to cope with this loss are exacerbated by food insecurity and an inability to access medicine and staple foods. Finally, we find that student–teacher contact has dropped from a pre-COVID-19 rate of 96% to just 17% among households with school-aged children. These findings can inform decisions by governments and international organizations on measures to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
The effects of COVID-19 on rural communities in Mahikeng Local municipality

Blessing Magocha,Mokgadi Molope,Martin Palamuleni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1629

2024-07-23

Abstract:Global pandemics are known to disturb livelihoods. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an example of such pandemic in the recent past. Its outbreak prompted a global response characterised by unprecedented measures to mitigate its spread. Several preventative measures were recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) such as lockdowns to curtail the transmission of the virus and manage the crisis it caused. These measures hampered the movement and distribution of basic commodities inadvertently triggering a series of socio-economic consequences particularly in rural areas. This study delves into the intricate interplay between the COVID-19 lockdown and its impact on the accessibility, affordability and availability of basic commodities within the context of the Mahikeng Local Municipality, in a rural setting. Quantitative survey data were collected from 260 households, which were randomly selected. The data analysis was performed using chi-square, with a significance level of p < 0.05. The results showed that basic commodities were largely available (99%) in the market during lockdown. There was no significant association between background variables and availability of basic commodities. Accessibility of basic commodities was affected by many factors such as concerns of COVID-19 outbreak. The study demonstrated that prices of basic commodities increased during lockdown, thereby having a ripple effect on accessibility and affordability of basic commodities. However, the availability of basic commodities was less affected. Contribution: The case study approach, focusing on Mahikeng Local Municipality, is essential for capturing localised nuances and providing actionable insights to policymakers, researchers and community leaders seeking to mitigate the negative effects of lockdowns on rural populations.
Impact of COVID-19 on Nutrition, Food Security and Dietary Diversity and Quality in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Nigeria

Isabel Madzorera,Abbas Ismail,Elena Hemler,Michelle Korte,Adedokun Olufemi,Dongqing Wang,Nega Assefa,Firehiwot Workneh,Bruno Lankoande,Angela Chukwu,Millogo Ourohire,Josiemer Mattei,Abdramane Soura,Yemane Berhane,Ali Sie,Ayoade Oduola,Wafaie Fawzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab029_035

2021-06-01

Current Developments in Nutrition

Abstract:Abstract Objectives COVID-19 has far-reaching consequences for developing countries through the combined effects of infection and mortality and unintended consequences from mitigation measures. COVID-19 can adversely impact food systems and dietary diversity for populations. This cross-sectional study evaluated, using a mobile platform, the effect of COVID-19 on food prices and dietary diversity and quality, among 1797 households in Nouna and Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso), Addis Ababa and Kersa (Ethiopia), and Lagos and Ibadan (Nigeria). Methods Dietary intake was assessed as the frequency of consumption of 20 food groups over the previous 7 days. Dietary diversity scores (DDS; range: 0–10) and Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS; range: 0–40) assessed dietary diversity and quality. Linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between changes in the prices of staples, pulses, vegetables, fruits, and animal source foods (ASF) with DDS and PDQS during COVID-19. Results Most households reported increases in prices of staples, pulses, fruits, vegetables and ASF, and ≥40% reported decreased consumption of staples, legumes, ASF, other vitamin A rich vegetables, other vegetables and other fruits, and lower DDS and PDQS compared to the period before the COVID-19 emergency. Increases in pulse prices were associated with lower DDS (estimate − 0.35, 95% CI: −0.61, −0.09). Lower crop production (estimate − 0.70, 95% CI: −1.02, −0.37), and skipping meals (estimate − 0.39, 95% CI: −0.56, −0.21) or not eating for a whole day (estimate − 0.23, 95% CI: −0.43, −0.03) were also associated with lower DDS. Conclusions The price increases and worsening dietary diversity and quality call for social protection and other strategies to increase the availability and affordability of nutrient-rich foods during the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies. Funding Sources The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grant as well as institutional support from the Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Germany and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, USA, supported this work.
Impact of the Corona pandemic on the livelihoods of rural farmers in some selected areas of Khulna district in Bangladesh

S Islam,Md Islam,Mohammad Ahmed

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/faa.170674

2024-01-01

Fundamental and Applied Agriculture

Abstract:The rapid transmission and outspread of the Coronavirus quickly caused a global pandemic and its associated circumscription measures have produced a variety of unexpected disturbances to agricultural and socioeconomic systems around the world. Therefore, the study was conducted to determine the impact of the Corona pandemic on the livelihoods of rural farmers, to determine rural farmers’ perceived impacts of the Corona pandemic on agricultural systems, to explain the magnitude of the impacts of the Corona pandemic in some selected areas of Khulna district in Bangladesh. Data were collected from purposively selected 110 respondents using a pre-tested interview schedule through personal interviews conducted from March, 2023 to April, 2023. Descriptive statistics such as range, frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and rank order were used whenever possible. Majority (45.5%) of the respondents had medium sized families where the majority (61.8%) of them had high farming experience, 66.4% had small-sized farms and the highest portion (48.2%) had medium income. The majority (58.2%) of the respondents had a moderately clear perception of the impacts of the pandemic on agricultural systems while 18.2% and 23.6% of respondents had partially clear and highly clear perceptions, respectively. The highest portion (55.5%) of the respondents perceived that they had a moderate impact on their livelihood activities followed by a partial impact (44.5%). The majority (53.6%) of the respondents perceived that the lockdown had a moderate impact on agricultural production followed by a partial impact (46.4%). About 43.63% of respondents considered economic loss as the highest magnitude of impact while 41.81% considered a reduction in income and an increase of agricultural input cost resulting in a higher cost of production. The existing impacts of the Corona pandemic should be minimized by taking proper initiatives by the concerned authorities to ensure a better standard of life for rural farmers.
The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on market integration: Evidence from vegetable farmers in Pakistan

Ayat Ullah,Ashok K. Mishra,Miroslava Bavorova,Harald Kächele

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103220

IF: 4.842

2022-10-01

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the agriculture sector and farming communities to unprecedented risks. This study investigates the impact of the pandemic, identifying the suggestions of community elders for effective resilience via in-depth interviews (IDIs) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). We also examine determinants of vegetable farmers' inputs and outputs market participation using a binary logit model. The findings reveal poor business owners’ support, difficulties accessing inputs and outputs markets, non-availability/shortage of inputs recommended by extension services, and poor access to mechanizations. Labor shortages, lack of access to agricultural credit, and lack of information on innovations and markets are also barriers to market integration of farming communities in Pakistan. Results of the logit model show that farming experience and support from market owners drive the participation of both the inputs and outputs market. Similarly, ownership of personal vehicles and the availability of farm machinery drive the participation of farmers in outputs markets. Various strategies are suggested to mitigate the risks of the Covid-19 pandemic, including the establishment of inputs and outputs markets, strategies for transportation, access to information, and farm machinery at the local level.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources

Accidental cardiopulmonary arrest following magnesium sulphate overdose.

Assessing impacts of COVID-19 and their responses among smallholder farmers in Brazil, Madagascar and Tanzania

Perception and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among smallholder farmers in eastern Ethiopia

Governing COVID-19: analyzing the effects of policy responses on food systems in Tanzania

Food system disruption: initial livelihood and dietary effects of COVID-19 on vegetable producers in India

Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on vegetable production systems and livelihoods: Smallholder farmer experiences in Burkina Faso

Impacts of a national lockdown on smallholder farmers’ income and food security: Empirical evidence from two states in India

Glutamine Prevents Late-Phase Anaphylaxis via MAPK Phosphatase 1-Dependent Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 Deactivation

Studies on oestrogens in cattle: oestrogen conversions in different tissues grown in vitro.

Can Concepts Reveal Criminals?

Immediate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on farming systems in Central America and Mexico

The impact of COVID-19 on diet quality, food security and nutrition in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the evidence

Food availability, accessibility and dietary practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country survey

COVID-19 and its effects on food producers: panel data evidence from Burkina Faso

Response and resilience of Asian agrifood systems to COVID-19: An assessment across twenty-five countries and four regional farming and food systems

COVID-19 and mental health in 8 low- and middle-income countries: A prospective cohort study

Socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 in low-income countries

The effects of COVID-19 on rural communities in Mahikeng Local municipality

Impact of COVID-19 on Nutrition, Food Security and Dietary Diversity and Quality in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Nigeria

Impact of the Corona pandemic on the livelihoods of rural farmers in some selected areas of Khulna district in Bangladesh

The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on market integration: Evidence from vegetable farmers in Pakistan