Sex differences in right ventricular adaptation to pressure overload in a rat model

Tik-Chee Cheng,Diana M Tabima,Laura R Caggiano,Andrea L Frump,Timothy A Hacker,Jens C Eickhoff,Tim Lahm,Naomi C Chesler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00175.2021
2022-03-01
Abstract:With severe right ventricular (RV) pressure overload, women demonstrate better clinical outcomes compared with men. The mechanoenergetic mechanisms underlying this protective effect, and their dependence on female endogenous sex hormones, remain unknown. To investigate these mechanisms and their impact on RV systolic and diastolic functional adaptation, we created comparable pressure overload via pulmonary artery banding (PAB) in intact male and female Wistar rats and ovariectomized (OVX) female rats. At 8 wk after surgery, right heart catheterization demonstrated increased RV energy input [indexed pressure-volume area (iPVA)] in all PAB groups, with the greatest increase in intact females. PAB also increased RV energy output [indexed stroke or external work (iEW)] in all groups, again with the greatest increase in intact females. In contrast, PAB only increased RV contractility-indexed end-systolic elastance (iEes)] in females. Despite these sex-dependent differences, no statistically significant effects were observed in the ratio of RV energy output to input (mechanical efficiency) or in mechanoenergetic cost to pump blood with pressure overload. These metrics were similarly unaffected by loss of endogenous sex hormones in females. Also, despite sex-dependent differences in collagen content and organization with pressure overload, decreases in RV compliance and relaxation time constant (tau Weiss) were not determined to be sex dependent. Overall, despite sex-dependent differences in RV contractile and fibrotic responses, RV mechanoenergetics for this degree and duration of pressure overload are comparable between sexes and suggest a homeostatic target.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sex differences in right ventricular mechanical efficiency and energetic adaptation to increased right ventricular afterload were measured. Despite sex-dependent differences in contractile and fibrotic responses, right ventricular mechanoenergetic adaptation was comparable between the sexes, suggesting a homeostatic target.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?