Impacts of Kinematic Information on Action Anticipation and the Related Neurophysiological Associations in Volleyball Experts

Xizhe Li,Danlei Wang,Siyu Gao,Chenglin Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14070647
IF: 3.333
2024-06-27
Brain Sciences
Abstract:In this study, we investigated the cognitive mechanisms underlying action anticipation in volleyball players, especially concerned with the differences between experts and amateurs. Participants included both expert (male, N = 26) and amateur (male, N = 23) volleyball players, who were asked to predict spiking movements containing high, medium, and low levels of kinematic information while their electrophysiological activities were recorded. The high-information stimuli included the whole spiking action, the medium-information stimuli ended at 120 ms, and the low-information stimuli ended at 160 ms before hand–ball contact. The results showed that experts significantly outperformed amateurs in both prediction accuracy (68% in experts vs. 55% in amateurs) and reaction time (475.09 ms in experts vs. 725.81 ms in amateurs) under the medium-information condition. Analysis of alpha rhythm activity revealed that experts exhibited the strongest desynchronization under the low-information condition, suggesting increased attentional engagement. In contrast, amateurs showed the weakest desynchronization under the medium-information condition. Furthermore, mu rhythm activity analysis showed greater desynchronization in the duration of 100–300 ms before hand–ball contact for experts, correlating with their higher anticipation accuracy. These findings highlight the significant kinematic information-processing abilities of volleyball experts and elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying efficient attentional engagement and mirroring. Therefore, this study provides valuable insights for the development of targeted training programs through which to enhance athletic performance.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the cognitive mechanisms of volleyball experts in action prediction, especially the differences between them and amateur players. Specifically, the research aims to understand the influence of different levels of kinematic information on the action - prediction ability of volleyball players and reveal the relevant neurophysiological associations. ### Research Background and Problem Statement 1. **The Importance of Action Prediction**: - In competitive sports, especially in volleyball matches, it is crucial to predict opponents' actions quickly and accurately. High - level athletes rely not only on proficient motor skills but also on their cognitive development. - The offense - defense conversion in volleyball matches is rapid and the strategies are complex, requiring athletes to predict each hit within a limited time. 2. **Differences between Experts and Amateur Players**: - Expert athletes can use early action cues for prediction, while novices rely more on later object cues (such as the ball's trajectory). - Expert athletes show significant advantages in prediction accuracy, reaction time, etc., especially when dealing with a moderate amount of information. 3. **The Role of Kinematic Information**: - Kinematic information refers to the information that athletes obtain by observing the characteristics of the opponent's body movements (such as footsteps, jumps, arm swings, etc.). - Expert athletes use this information more effectively and show higher prediction accuracy especially when dealing with early movement patterns. 4. **Neurophysiological Mechanisms**: - Research shows that when expert athletes observe and predict actions in specific fields, certain areas of the brain (such as the supplementary motor area and the superior parietal lobe) show stronger activation. - This activation can be reflected by the mu - rhythm suppression and alpha - rhythm desynchronization in electroencephalogram (EEG), and these neural oscillation patterns are related to efficient attention participation and mirror mechanisms. ### Research Hypotheses - Expert athletes will perform better in prediction under the condition of moderate amount of information than amateur players. - Expert athletes will show obvious differences in the neural oscillation patterns of mu - rhythm and alpha - rhythm, reflecting their advantages in kinematic information processing and attention participation. By comparing the performance of expert and amateur volleyball players under different information - quantity conditions and analyzing their neurophysiological activities, this research aims to reveal the cognitive and neural mechanisms of expert athletes in action prediction and provide valuable insights for improving athletes' performance.