Enterococcal Endocarditis and Penicillin Allergy

D. A. Plante,S. Pauker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X8300300115

1983-02-01

Medical Decision Making

Abstract:LZ, a 77-year-old white male with a past history of hypertension, a grade II/VI systolic heart murmur, compensated congestive heart failure, thalassemia, and mild renal insufficiency (serum creatinine ranging from 1.3 to 1.8 mg/dl), was admitted for evaluation and management of recurrent enterococcal bacteremia. Six weeks earlier, cystoscopy, a retropubic prostatectomy and removal of bladder calculi were performed. At that time LZ received gentamicin intramuscularly for routine preoperative prophylaxis. On the eleventh postoperative day his temperature rose to 39°C. Blood, urine, and the operative wound were cultured: all revealed enterococcus, sensitive to ampicillin, vancomycin, erythromycin, and the aminoglycoside antibiotics. Initially, this patient was treated with intravenous cefoxitin and amikacin, and defervesced. Five days later these antibiotics were discontinued and oral erythromycin was administered (ampicillin was not started because of a remote history of a rash associated with penicillin therapy). Subsequent blood cultures again contained enterococcus. The allergy and infectious disease services were consulted for recommendations about further antibiotic therapy. During cutaneous testing to penicillin antigens, the patient demonstrated a positive reaction to the major determinant (penicilloyl polylysine) and an equivocal reaction to the minor determinant (aged penicillin). These results were interpreted as indicating a 50% to 65% risk of allergic reaction if penicillin or its derivatives were to be administered without desensitization. Therefore, vancomycin was recommended, and he received one dose. The infectious disease consultant was the first to raise the possibility of endocarditis to explain the persistent bac-