Interventions, Barriers, and Facilitators to Address the Sexual Problems of Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Living with HIV: A Rapid Scoping Review
Francesco Avallone,Kim Engler,Joseph Cox,Ford Hickson,Bertrand Lebouché
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04237-3
2024-02-02
AIDS and Behavior
Abstract:Sexual problems are common among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) after diagnosis with HIV. However, these are often overlooked in care and research, where sexual risk reduction and biomedical aspects of sexual health tend to dominate. We conducted a rapid scoping review to investigate which sexual problems of GBM living with HIV are addressed by interventions, and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation. Literature from high-income countries published in English since 2010 was reviewed. Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Scopus databases were searched on July 4, 2022. Targeted sexual problems were categorized according to the ten dimensions of Robinson's Sexual Health Model, and barriers and facilitators, according to the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interventions focused solely on the dimension of Sexual Health Care/Safer Sex were excluded. Relevant information was extracted from the qualifying documents with NVivo 12 software for content analysis. Fifty-two documents were included, referring to 37 interventions which mainly took place in the United States ( n = 29/37; 78%), were group-based ( n = 16; 41%), and used counselling techniques ( n = 23; 62%; e.g., motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioral therapy). Their settings were mostly primary care ( n = 15; 40%) or community-based ( n = 16; 43%). On average, interventions addressed three sexual health dimensions ( SD = 2; range: 1–10). The most targeted dimension was Sexual Health Care/Safer Sex ( n = 26; 70%), which concerned sexual risk reduction. Next, Challenges ( n = 23; 62%), included substance use ( n = 7; 19%), sexual compulsivity ( n = 6; 16%), sexual abuse ( n = 6; 16%), and intimate partner violence ( n = 4; 11%). Third was Talking About Sex ( n = 22; 59%) which mostly concerned HIV disclosure. About a third of interventions addressed Culture/Sexual identity ( n = 14; 38%), Intimacy/Relationships ( n = 12; 33%), and Positive sexuality ( n = 11; 30%). Finally, few targeted Body Image ( n = 4; 11%), Spirituality ( n = 3; 8%), Sexual Anatomy Functioning ( n = 2; 5%) or Masturbation/Fantasy ( n = 1; 3%). Forty-one documents (79%) mentioned implementation barriers or facilitators, particularly about the characteristics of the interventions (41% and 78%, respectively; e.g., cost, excessive duration, acceptability, feasibility) and of the individuals involved (37% and 46%; e.g., perceived stigmatization, provider expertise). The other three CFIR dimensions were less common (5%–17%). The search strategy of this review may not have captured all eligible documents, due to its limit to English-language publications. Overall, most interventions incorporated a focus on Sexual Health Care/Safer Sex, at the expenses of other prevalent sexual problems among GBM living with HIV, such as intimate partner violence (Challenges), erectile dysfunction (Sexual Anatomy Functioning), and Body Image dissatisfaction. These findings suggest they could receive more attention within clinical care and at the community level. They also highlight the importance of cost-effective and acceptable interventions conducted in non-stigmatizing environments, where patients' needs can be met by providers who are adequately trained on sexuality-related topics.
public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical