Abstract:Aims The safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with contemporary balloon expandable transcatheter valves in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remain largely unknown. In this study, the TAVRs performed for CS between June 2015 and September 2022 using SAPIEN 3 and SAPIEN 3 Ultra bioprosthesis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry were analysed. Methods and results CS was defined as: (i) coding of CS within 24 h on Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry form; and/or (ii) pre-procedural use of inotropes or mechanical circulatory support devices and/or (iii) cardiac arrest within 24 h prior to TAVR. The control group was comprised of all the other patients undergoing TAVR. Baseline characteristics, all-cause mortality, and major complications at 30-day and 1-year outcomes were reported. Landmark analysis was performed at 30 days post-TAVR. Cox-proportional multivariable analysis was performed to determine the predictors of all-cause mortality at 1 year. A total of 309 505 patients underwent TAVR with balloon-expandable valves during the study period. Of these, 5006 patients presented with CS prior to TAVR (1.6%). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 10.76 ± 10.4. The valve was successfully implanted in 97.9% of patients. Technical success according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria was 94.5%. In a propensity-matched analysis, CS was associated with higher in-hospital (9.9% vs. 2.7%), 30-day (12.9% vs. 4.9%), and 1-year (29.7% vs. 22.6%) mortality compared to the patients undergoing TAVR without CS. In the landmark analysis after 30 days, the risk of 1-year mortality was similar between the two groups [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.21]. Patients who were alive at 1 year noted significant improvements in functional class (Class I/II 89%) and quality of life (ΔKCCQ score +50). In the multivariable analysis, older age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02–1.03), peripheral artery disease (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06–1.47), prior implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07–1.77), patients on dialysis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.69–2.53), immunocompromised status (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.05–1.69), New York Heart Association class III/IV symptoms (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.06–2.12), lower aortic valve mean gradient, lower albumin levels, lower haemoglobin levels, and lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores were independently associated with 1-year mortality. Conclusion This large observational real-world study demonstrates that the TAVR is a safe and effective treatment for aortic stenosis patients presenting with CS. Patients who survived the first 30 days after TAVR had similar mortality rates to those who were not in CS.

Incidence and predictors of cardiogenic shock following surgical or transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

Most Hospitalized Patients with Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation Have Advanced Disease Preventing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention

Sex-based differences in candidacy for transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

Severity of tricuspid regurgitation is associated with long-term mortality

Tricuspid regurgitation and in-hospital outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients

Risk Factors Associated with Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality Following Isolated Tricuspid Valve Replacement.

Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Valves

Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock

Managing Implanted Cardiac Electronic Devices in Patients With Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Prognostic Value of Tricuspid Valve Gradient After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the TriValve Registry

Prognostic implications of residual tricuspid regurgitation grading after transcatheter tricuspid valve repair

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation

TRIVALVE Score: A Risk Score for Mortality/Hospitalization Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention

Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

New Therapeutic Advances in the Management of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

Natural history and mid-term prognosis of severe tricuspid regurgitation: A cohort study

Right ventricular remodeling and clinical outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention

Prevalence and impact of preoperative moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation on patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome after transcatheter mitral valve repair

Outcomes of Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons Analysis and Risk Model