Handling Knowledge-Based Decision Making Issues in Collaborative Settings: An Integrated Approach

Christina E. Evangelou,N. Karacapilidis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11752912_7

2006-05-18

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Association of depressive symptoms with incidence and mortality rates of COVID-19 over 2 years among healthcare workers in 20 countries: multi-country serial cross-sectional study

Hiroki Asaoka,Kazuhiro Watanabe,Yuki Miyamoto,Alexandra Restrepo-Henao,Els van der Ven,Maria Francesca Moro,Lubna A Alnasser,Olatunde Ayinde,Arin A Balalian,Armando Basagoitia,Sol Durand-Arias,Mehmet Eskin,Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez,Freytes Frey Marcela Ines,Luis Giménez,Hans W Hoek,Rodrigo Ezequiel Jaldo,Jutta Lindert,Humberto Maldonado,Gonzalo Martínez-Alés,Roberto Mediavilla,Clare McCormack,Javier Narvaez,Uta Ouali,Aida Barrera-Perez,Erwin Calgua-Guerra,Jorge Ramírez,Ana María Rodríguez,Dominika Seblova,Andrea Tenorio Correia da Silva,Linda Valeri,Oye Gureje,Dinarte Ballester,Mauro Giovanni Carta,Anna Isahakyan,Amira Jamoussi,Jana Seblova,Maria Teresa Solis-Soto,Ruben Alvarado,Ezra Susser,Franco Mascayano,Daisuke Nishi,HEROES group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03585-8

2024-09-12

Abstract:Background: Long-term deterioration in the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) has been reported during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the impact of COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates on the mental health of HCWs is essential to prepare for potential new pandemics. This study aimed to investigate the association of COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates with depressive symptoms over 2 years among HCWs in 20 countries during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a multi-country serial cross-sectional study using data from the first and second survey waves of the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) global study. The HEROES study prospectively collected data from HCWs at various health facilities. The target population included HCWs with both clinical and non-clinical roles. In most countries, healthcare centers were recruited based on convenience sampling. As an independent variable, daily COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates were calculated using confirmed cases and deaths reported by Johns Hopkins University. These rates represent the average for the 7 days preceding the participants' response date. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. A multilevel linear mixed model (LMM) was conducted to investigate the association of depressive symptoms with the average incidence and mortality rates. Results: A total of 32,223 responses from the participants who responded to all measures used in this study on either the first or second survey, and on both the first and second surveys in 20 countries were included in the analysis. The mean age was 40.1 (SD = 11.1), and 23,619 responses (73.3%) were from females. The 9323 responses (28.9%) were nurses and 9119 (28.3%) were physicians. LMM showed that the incidence rate was significantly and positively associated with depressive symptoms (coefficient = 0.008, standard error 0.003, p = 0.003). The mortality rate was significantly and positively associated with depressive symptoms (coefficient = 0.049, se = 0.020, p = 0.017). Conclusions: This is the first study to show an association between COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates with depressive symptoms among HCWs during the first 2 years of the outbreak in multiple countries. This study's findings indicate that additional mental health support for HCWs was needed when the COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates increase during and after the early phase of the pandemic, and these findings may apply to future pandemics. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04352634.
Inequality on the frontline: A multi-country study on gender differences in mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Diana Czepiel,Clare McCormack,Andréa T.C. da Silva,Dominika Seblova,Maria F. Moro,Alexandra Restrepo-Henao,Adriana M. Martínez,Oyeyemi Afolabi,Lubna Alnasser,Rubén Alvarado,Hiroki Asaoka,Olatunde Ayinde,Arin Balalian,Dinarte Ballester,Josleen A.l. Barathie,Armando Basagoitia,Djordje Basic,María S. Burrone,Mauro G. Carta,Sol Durand-Arias,Mehmet Eskin,Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez,Marcela I. F. Frey,Oye Gureje,Anna Isahakyan,Rodrigo Jaldo,Elie G. Karam,Dorra Khattech,Jutta Lindert,Gonzalo Martínez-Alés,Franco Mascayano,Roberto Mediavilla,Javier A. Narvaez Gonzalez,Aimee Nasser-Karam,Daisuke Nishi,Olusegun Olaopa,Uta Ouali,Victor Puac-Polanco,Dorian E. Ramírez,Jorge Ramírez,Eliut Rivera-Segarra,Bart P.F. Rutten,Julian Santaella-Tenorio,Jaime C. Sapag,Jana Šeblová,María T. S. Soto,Maria Tavares-Cavalcanti,Linda Valeri,Marit Sijbrandij,Ezra S. Susser,Hans W. Hoek,Els van der Ven,Andréa Tenório Correia da Silva,Maria Francesca Moro,Adriana Maldonado Martínez,Josleen A. I. Barathie,María Soledad Burrone,Mauro Giovanni Carta,Marcela Ines Freytes Frey,Bart P. F. Rutten,María Teresa Solís Soto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.18

2024-03-26

Global Mental Health

Abstract:Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at increased risk for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic, with prior data suggesting women may be particularly vulnerable. Our global mental health study aimed to examine factors associated with gender differences in psychological distress and depressive symptoms among HCWs during COVID-19. Across 22 countries in South America, Europe, Asia and Africa, 32,410 HCWs participated in the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study between March 2020 and February 2021. They completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and questions about pandemic-relevant exposures. Consistently across countries, women reported elevated mental health problems compared to men. Women also reported increased COVID-19-relevant stressors, including insufficient personal protective equipment and less support from colleagues, while men reported increased contact with COVID-19 patients. At the country level, HCWs in countries with higher gender inequality reported less mental health problems. Higher COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with increased psychological distress merely among women. Our findings suggest that among HCWs, women may have been disproportionately exposed to COVID-19-relevant stressors at the individual and country level. This highlights the importance of considering gender in emergency response efforts to safeguard women's well-being and ensure healthcare system preparedness during future public health crises.

psychiatry
The caregiving work experience of healthcare workers in Chile during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health: A qualitative study based on the international initiative HEROES

Jorge Ramírez,Victoria Lermanda,Antonia Aguirre,Sebastián Villarroel,Valentina Carrera,Felipe Castañeda,Rubén Alvarado,Paula Bedregal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.07.2952

2024-08-30

Medwave

Abstract:Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the mental health of healthcare workers. Studying the care perspective is essential to understanding the causes of specific mental health findings and proposing strategies to address them. Methods: Cross-sectional study with a thematic analytical approach, derived from the international initiative "The Health Care Workers Study" (HEROES), conducted among healthcare workers in Chile during the second semester of 2022 and the first of 2023 through semi-structured interviews and inductive coding. Results: A narrative synthesis of 35 interviews in four themes: care at work: the presence of changes in work tasks, concern about becoming infected, collective "mystique", stigma due to being a healthcare worker, conflicts with patients; care at home: multiple ways of arranging household tasks, the relevance of living with others, interrelation with work dynamics, "double burden" among women; relationship with one's own mental health: recognition of mental health impact, the stress associated with change and uncertainty, perception of work overload, feelings of guilt or responsibility for infecting family members; and beliefs and values about the pandemic and its effects: acceptance of psychological impact on healthcare workers, organizational culture as a relevant element in postponing one's own mental health, initial disbelief in the effects of the pandemic, similarities with previous periods of social upheaval, and equality among people in terms of vulnerability to the disease. Conclusions: Five elements emerge as potential areas for intervention: gender perspective, previous exposure to crisis experiences, self-care spaces, peer support, and institutional response. The care perspective helps study the relationship between some stressors and healthcare workers' mental health in the context of a pandemic.
Effects of sugars and other substances upon nerve.

R. Lorente de Nó

Abstract:
Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers in different regions of the world

Mahfuja Islam,Philip George,Sindhu Sankaran,Janet Leu Su Hui,Tzun Kit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.690

2021-06-01

BJPsych Open

Abstract:Aims The global health system is facing a serious challenge after the recent outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus infection which was first identified in Wuhan, China in November 2019 and declared as a pandemic in March 2020 by WHO. There is a wide consensus that this pandemic has negative psychosocial consequences as well as unforeseeable provision of mental health care services and just not on physical health alone. The aim of this research study is to determine the prevalence of psychological distress and to identify the sociodemographic variables with the main attributable factors associated with the psychological distress among healthcare workers and suggestions on how to reduce the impact on the mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in different regions of the world. Method We performed a cross-sectional study from September-November 2020. We used a self-administered survey tool which was distributed electronically to healthcare workers across the globe. The data were stored on an online database with password protected devices where survey responses were restricted to investigators exclusively. Data collected were: 1) Socio-demographic data (age, gender, marital status, ethnicity, religion, role in the healthcare, region of practice); 2) Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) questionnaire which contains 22 standardized items. This is a subjective assessment to score the degree of psychological well-being by focusing on 6 domains: depression; anxiety; positive-well-being; self-control; vitality and general health; 3) Subjective assessment from respondents of the main attributable factors causing psychological distress and suggested methods to help reduce the impact on mental health on health care workers. Result Majority out of the 217 respondents were from a younger age group; females and married/domestic partnership, mainly from Western Pacific Region, South East Asian and the African Region. More than half the respondents were moderate-severely psychologically distressed and the three main attributable factors causing psychological distress were: fear of family/friends contracting COVID-19 followed by lack of PPE and discomfort caused by wearing PPE for long hours. Respondents suggested that the distress would be reduced if: more resources were provided in hospital; protocols and guidelines were implemented and counselling facilities with recreational activities were available to frontline workers. Conclusion This study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mental health of healthcare workers and more support or strategies need to come in place to protect frontline workers at the time of crises.

psychiatry
Hospital workers mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: methods of data collection and characteristics of study sample in a university hospital in Milan (Italy)

A Fattori,F Cantù,A Comotti,V Tombola,E Colombo,C Nava,L Bordini,L Riboldi,M Bonzini,P Brambilla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01355-1

2021-08-10

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is currently a severe challenge for healthcare workers, with a considerable impact on their mental health. In order to focus preventive and rehabilitation measures it's fundamental to identify risk factors of such psychological impairment. We designed an observational longitudinal study to systematically examine the psychological wellbeing of all employees in a large University Hospital in Italy, using validated psychometric scales in the context of the occupational physician's health surveillance, in collaboration with Psychiatric Unit. Methods: The study started after ethical approval in August 2020. For each worker, the psychological wellbeing is screened in two steps. The first level questionnaire collects sociodemographic characteristics, personal and occupational COVID-19 exposure, worries and concerns about COVID-19, general psychological discomfort (GHQ-12), post-traumatic stress symptoms (IES-R) and anxiety (GAD-7). Workers who score above the cut-off in at least one scale are further investigated by the second level questionnaire composed by PHQ-9, DES-II and SCL-90. If second level shows psychological impairments, we offer individual specialist treatment (third level). We plan to follow-up all subjects to monitor symptoms and possible chronicization; we aim to investigate potential risk factors through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regressions. Results: Preliminary results refer to a sample of 550 workers who completed the multi-step evaluation from August to December 2020, before vaccination campaign started. The participation rate was 90%. At first level screening, 39% of the subjects expressed general psychological discomfort (GHQ-12), 22% post-traumatic stress symptoms (IES-R), and 21% symptoms of anxiety (GAD-7). Women, nurses, younger workers, subjects with COVID-19 working exposure and with an infected family member showed significantly higher psychological impairment compared to colleagues. After the second level screening, 12% and 7% of all workers showed, respectively, depressive and dissociative symptoms; scorings were significantly associated with gender and occupational role. We are currently extending sample size and evaluating subjects over a period of further 12 months. Conclusions: The possibility to perform a systematic follow-up of psychological wellbeing of all hospital workers, directly or indirectly exposed to pandemic consequences, constitutes a unique condition to detect individual, occupational, and non-occupational risk factors for psychological impairment in situations of prolonged stress, as well as variables associated with symptoms chronicization.
[Intradermal administration of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis].

M. Boffano

1955-03-17

Minerva Medica

Abstract:
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers in Italy: Analyzing the Role of Individual and Workplace-Level Factors in the Reopening Phase After Lockdown

Maria Francesca Moro,Gemma Calamandrei,Ranieri Poli,Valentina Di Mattei,Alessandra Perra,Peter Konstantin Kurotschka,Alexandra Restrepo,Ferdinando Romano,Giuseppe La Torre,Emanuele Preti,Franco Mascayano,Angelo Picardi,Flavia Chiarotti,Venerando Rapisarda,Antonio Urban,Ruben Alvarado,Ezra Susser,Mauro Giovanni Carta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867080

IF: 4.7

2022-06-03

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction: Italy is one of the high-income countries hit hardest by Covid-19. During the first months of the pandemic, Italian healthcare workers were praised by media and the public for their efforts to face the emergency, although with limited knowledge and resources. However, healthcare workers soon had to face new challenges at a time when the national health system was working hard to recover. This study focuses on this difficult period to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of Italian healthcare workers. Materials and Methods: Healthcare workers from all Italian regions [ n = 5,502] completed an online questionnaire during the reopening phase after the first wave lockdown. We assessed a set of individual-level factors (e.g., stigma and violence against HCWs) and a set of workplace-level factors (e.g., trust in the workplace capacity to handle COVID-19) that were especially relevant in this context. The primary outcomes assessed were score ≥15 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and score ≥4 on the General Health Questionnaire-12, indicators of clinically significant depressive symptoms and psychological distress, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were performed on depressive symptoms and psychological distress for each individual- and workplace-level factor adjusting for gender, age, and profession. Results: Clinically significant depressive symptoms were observed in 7.5% and psychological distress in 37.9% of HCWs. 30.5% of healthcare workers reported having felt stigmatized or discriminated, while 5.7% reported having experienced violence. Feeling stigmatized or discriminated and experiencing violence due to being a healthcare worker were strongly associated with clinically significant depressive symptoms [OR 2.98, 95%CI 2.36–3.77 and OR 4.72 95%CI 3.41–6.54] and psychological distress [OR 2.30, 95%CI 2.01–2.64 and OR 2.85 95%CI 2.16–3.75]. Numerous workplace-level factors, e.g., trust in the workplace capacity to handle COVID-19 [OR 2.43, 95%CI 1.92–3.07] and close contact with a co-worker who died of COVID-19 [OR 2.05, 95%CI 1.56–2.70] were also associated with clinically significant depressive symptoms. Similar results were found for psychological distress. Conclusions: Our study emphasizes the need to address discrimination and violence against healthcare professionals and improve healthcare work environments to strengthen the national health system's capacity to manage future emergencies.

psychiatry
Impact of COVID-19 first wave on the mental health of healthcare workers in a Front-Line Spanish Tertiary Hospital: lessons learned

Juan D Molina,Franco Amigo,Gemma Vilagut,Philippe Mortier,Carmen Muñoz-Ruiperez,Irene Rodrigo Holgado,Alba Juanes González,Carolina Elisa Combarro Ripoll,Jordi Alonso,Gabriel Rubio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58884-0

2024-04-08

Abstract:Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at high risk of experiencing psychological distress during COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact on HCWs' mental health in a Spanish hospital. Cross-sectional study of HCW, active between May and June 2020. A web-based survey assessed probable current mental disorders (major depressive disorder [PHQ-8 ≥ 10], generalized anxiety disorder [GAD-7 ≥ 10], panic attacks, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD; PLC-5 ≥ 7], or substance use disorder [CAGE-AID ≥ 2]). The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) was used to assess severe impairment and items taken from the modified self-report version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) assessed suicidal thoughts and behaviors. A total of 870 HCWs completed the survey. Most frequent probable mental disorders were major depressive disorder (33.6%), generalized anxiety disorder (25.5%), panic attacks (26.9%), PTSD (27.2%), and substance use disorder (5.0%). Being female, having aged 18-29 years, being an auxiliary nurse, direct exposure to COVID-19-infected patients, and pre-pandemic lifetime mental disorders were positively associated with mental issues. Hospital HCWs presented a high prevalence of symptoms of mental disorders, especially depression, PTSD, panic attacks, and anxiety. Younger individuals and those with lifetime mental disorders have been more vulnerable to experiencing them.
Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among frontline healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jie Tong,Jie Zhang,Na Zhu,Yu Pei,Weiqing Liu,Wei Yu,Chengping Hu,Xirong Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1096857

IF: 3.8

2023-01-28

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Background: As some countries announced to remove Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) border, it indicates that the COVID-19 may have entered its terminal stage. In this COVID-19 pandemic, the mental health of frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) experienced unprecedented challenges. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among frontline HCWs lacks a high-quality and long-term systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. The system searches EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, ScienceNet, and ERIC. Analyze the mental health problems of frontline HCWs in different regions and periods, including insomnia, stress, anxiety and depression. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021253821. Results: A total of 19 studies on the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among frontline HCWs were included in this study. The overall prevalence of insomnia was 42.9% (95% CI, 33.9–51.9%, I 2 = 99.0%) extracted from data from 14 cross-sectional studies ( n = 10 127), 1 cohort study ( n = 4,804), and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT; n = 482) in 10 countries. The overall prevalence of stress was 53.0% (95% CI, 41.1–64.9%, I 2 = 78.3%) extracted from data from nine cross-sectional studies ( n = 5,494) and 1 RCT study ( n = 482) from eight countries. The overall prevalence of anxiety and depression was 43.0% (95% CI, 33.8–52.3%, I 2 = 99.0%) and 44.6% (95% CI, 36.1–53.1%, I 2 = 99.0%) extracted from data from 17 cross-sectional studies ( n = 11,727), one cohort study ( n = 4,804), and one RCT study ( n = 482) from 12 countries. The prevalence of stress and depression was higher in 2020, while the prevalence of insomnia and anxiety was higher in 2021. The prevalence of mental health problems among physicians was higher than that of other frontline HCWs. The prevalence of mental health problems among frontline HCWs is higher in South America and lower in North America. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the COVID-19 pandemic have significant effects on mental health among frontline HCWs. The overall prevalence of insomnia, stress, anxiety and depression among frontline HCWs is high. Therefore, the health policy-makers should pay attention to and respond to the mental health problems of frontline HCWs in the context of public health emergencies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers at acute hospital settings in the South-East of Ireland: an observational cohort multicentre study

Saied Ali,Sinead Maguire,Eleanor Marks,Maeve Doyle,Claire Sheehy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042930

IF: 3.006

2020-12-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objective Our study aims to understand the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) at acute hospital settings in the South-East of Ireland, as a crucial step in guiding policies and interventions to maintain their psychological well-being. Design Observational cohort study. Participants and setting 472 HCWs participated from two distinct acute hospital settings, A and B, in the South-East of Ireland. Primary and secondary outcome measures Measures of psychological distress—depression, anxiety, acute and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)—as dictated by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). An independent sample t-test and a Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine significance of difference in continuous variables between groups. Categorical variables were assessed for significance with a χ 2 test for independence. Results The DASS-21 provided independent measures of depression (mean 4.57, IQR 2–7), anxiety (mean 3.87, IQR 1–6) and stress (mean 7.41, IQR 4–10). Positive scores were reflected in 201 workers (42.6%) for depression and 213 (45.1%) for both anxiety and stress. The IES-R measured subjective distress on three subscales: intrusion (mean 1.085, IQR 0.375–1.72), avoidance (mean 1.008, IQR 0.375–1.5) and hyperarousal (mean 1.084, IQR 0.5–1.667). Overall, 195 cases (41.3%) were concerning for PTSD. Site B scored significantly higher across all parameters of depression (5.24 vs 4.08, p<0.01), anxiety (4.66 vs 3.3, p<0.01), stress (8.91 vs 6.33, p<0.01) and PTSD (0.058 vs 0.043, p<0.01). Worse outcomes were also noted in HCWs with underlying medical ailments. Conclusion Psychological distress is prevalent among HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic; screening for adverse mental and emotional outcomes and developing timely tailored preventative measures with effective feedback are vital to protect their psychological well-being, both in the immediate and long-term.

medicine, general & internal
Fear of the unknown: Experience of frontline healthcare workers with coping strategies used to face the COVID 19 pandemic

Gabriela Arango-Martinez,Laura Becerra Sarmiento,Isabela Castaneda Forero,Laura Castaneda Carreno,Yazmin Cadena-Camargo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003373

2024-08-15

Abstract:The COVID 19 pandemic presented various challenges among health care workers, one of them being the impact it has on mental health. The psychological problems such as anxiety, depression, insomnia and stress, all consequences of the pandemic cause psychopathological outcomes reverberating negatively on the emotional well-being of health care workers. This study aimed to explore the experience of frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in a middle-income country in Latin America and to identify the coping mechanisms they used to face stressful situations during this time. A qualitative study based on an interpretative paradigm was conducted allowing to examine complex, ambiguous and emotionally loaded topics to explore in detail the experience of frontline HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through convenience sampling eleven frontline HCWs were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. An inductive analysis was done with four pre-established categories: the experience of HCWs during the attention of COVID-19 patients, the experience during their own infection, the experience during the work reintegration and the coping mechanisms used. Our results show that fear and uncertainty predominated throughout the attention of COVID-19 patients. Participants used both coping strategies based on problem-solving efforts, such as routine changes, and emotional management efforts, like social support or psychological counselling. The choice of coping strategies was influenced by their personal beliefs, past emotional experiences, and prior medical formation. These findings provide public and private institutions insight for creating effective policies, based on the HCWs' preferences, to promote their psychological well-being.
Mental Health of Guatemalan Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Baseline Findings From the HEROES Cohort Study

Alejandra Paniagua-Avila,Dorian E Ramírez,Aida Barrera-Pérez,Erwin Calgua,Claudia Castro,Ana Peralta-García,Franco Mascayano,Ezra Susser,Rubén Alvarado,Victor Puac-Polanco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306648

Abstract:Objectives. To assess the baseline prevalence of mental health conditions and associated exposures in a cohort of health care workers (HCWs) in Guatemala. Methods. We analyzed baseline information from the 2020 Web-based COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study (HEROES)-Guatemala. Outcomes included mental distress and depressive symptoms. Exposures included COVID-19 experiences, sociodemographic characteristics, and job characteristics. We used crude and adjusted Poisson regression models in our analyses. Results. Of the 1801 HCWs who accepted to participate, 1522 (84.5%) completed the questionnaire; 1014 (66.8%) were women. Among the participants, 59.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 56.6, 61.5) screened positive for mental distress and 23% (95% CI = 20.9, 25.2) for moderate to severe depressive symptoms. COVID-19 experiences, sociodemographic characteristics, and job characteristics were associated with the study outcomes. Participants who were worried about COVID-19 infection were at higher risk of mental distress (relative risk [RR] = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.30, 1.66) and depressive symptoms (RR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.17, 1.96). Similarly, the youngest participants were at elevated risk of mental distress (RR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.24, 2.63) and depressive symptoms (OR = 4.58; 95% CI = 1.51, 13.87). Conclusions. Mental health conditions are highly prevalent among Guatemalan HCWs. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S6):S602-S614. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306648).
Impact of COVID-19 on mental health of health care workers in Spain: a mix-methods study

J. Ripoll,X. Chela-Alvarez,E. Briones-Vozmediano,M. A. Fiol de-Roque,R. Zamanillo-Campos,I. Ricci-Cabello,J. Llobera,C. Calafat-Villalonga,M. J. Serrano-Ripoll,X. Chela,E. MA Briones-VozmedianoFiol-de Roque

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17979-z

IF: 4.5

2024-02-14

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Spain's lockdown measures couldn't prevent the severe impact of the COVID-19 first wave, leading to high infections, deaths, and strain on healthcare workers (HCWs). This study aimed to explore the mental health impact on HCWs in the Balearic Islands during the initial months of the pandemic, the influencing factors, and the experiences of those in a COVID-19 environment. Methods Using a mixed-methods approach, the study encompassed quantitative and qualitative elements. Cross-sectional survey data from April to June 2020 comprised HCWs who were emailed invitations. The survey covered demographics, work, clinical and COVID-19 variables, along with psychological distress and PTSD symptoms, using validated measures. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with HCWs offered qualitative insights. Results Three hundred thirty-six HCWs averaging 46.8 years, mainly women (79.2%), primarily nurses in primary care with over 10 years of experience. Anxiety symptoms were reported by 28.8%, 65.1% noted worsened sleep quality, and 27.7% increased psychoactive drug usage. Psychological distress affected 55.2%, while 27.9% exhibited PTSD symptoms. Gender, age, experience, COVID-19 patient contact, and workload correlated with distress, PTSD symptoms, sleep quality, and psychoactive drug usage. Interviews uncovered discomfort sources, such as fear of infection and lack of control, leading to coping strategies like information avoidance and seeking support. Limitations Static cross-sectional design, non-probabilistic sample, and telephone interviews affecting non-verbal cues, with interviews conducted during early pandemic lockdown. Conclusions HCWs faced significant psychological distress during the pandemic's first wave, underscoring the necessity for robust support and resources to counteract its impact on mental health.

public, environmental & occupational health
Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo,Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano,Ana Catalan,Celso Arango,Carmen Moreno,Francisco Ferre,Jae Il Shin,Sarah Sullivan,Natascia Brondino,Marco Solmi,Paolo Fusar-Poli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.022

IF: 6.533

2020-10-01

Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract:BackgroundHealth care workers (HCW) are at high risk of developing physical/mental health outcomes related to coronavirus syndromes. Nature and frequency of these outcomes are undetermined.MethodsPRISMA/MOOSE-compliant (PROSPERO-CRD42020180205) systematic review of Web of Science/grey literature until 15th April 2020, to identify studies reporting physical/mental health outcomes in HCW infected/exposed to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome -SARS-, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome -MERS-, Novel coronavirus -COVID-19-. Proportion random effect meta-analyses, I2 statistic, quality assessment and sensitivity analysis.Results115 articles were included (n=60,458 HCW, age 36.1±7.1, 77.1% female). Physical health outcomes: 75.9% HCW infected by SARS/MERS/COVID-19 reported fever (95%CI=65.9–83.7%, k=12, n=949), 47.9% cough (95%CI=39.2–56.8%, k=14, n=970), 43.6% myalgias (95%CI=31.9–56.0%, k=13, n=898), 42.3% chills (95%CI=20.2–67.9%, k=7, n=716), 41.2% fatigue (95%CI=18.2–68.8%, k=6, n=386), 34.6% headaches (95%CI=23.1–48.2%, k=11, n=893), 31.2% dyspnoea (95%CI=23.2–40.5%, k=12, n=1003), 25.3% sore throat (95%CI=18.8–33.2%, k=8, n=747), 22.2% nausea/vomiting (95%CI=14.9–31.8%, k=6, n=662), 18.8% diarrhoea (95%CI=11.9–28.4%, k=9, n=824). Mental health outcomes: 62.5% HCW exposed to SARS/MERS/COVID-19 reported general health concerns (95%CI=57.0–67,8%, k=2, n=2254), 43.7% fear (95%CI=33.9–54.0%, k=4, n=584), 37.9% insomnia (95%CI=30.9–45.5%, k=6, n=5067), 37.8% psychological distress (95%CI=28.4–48.2%, k=15, n=24,346), 34.4% burnout (95%CI=19.3–53.5%, k=3, n=1337), 29.0% anxiety features (95%CI=14.2–50.3%, k=6, n=9191), 26.3% depressive symptoms (95%CI=12.5–47.1%, k=8, n=9893), 20.7% post-traumatic stress disorder features (95%CI=13.2–31%, k=11, n=3826), 16.1% somatisation (95%CI=0.2–96.0%, k=2, n=2184), 14.0% stigmatisation feelings (95%CI=6.4–28.1%, k=2, n=411).LimitationsLimited amount of evidence for some outcomes and suboptimal design in several studies included.ConclusionsSARS/MERS/COVID-19 have a substantial impact on the physical and mental health of HCW, which should become a priority for public health strategies.

psychiatry,clinical neurology
Mental health status and related factors influencing healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jia Huang,Zhu-Tang Huang,Xin-Ce Sun,Ting-Ting Chen,Xiao-Tian Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289454

IF: 3.7

2024-01-19

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background The mental health of healthcare workers during the coronavirus-2019 pandemic was seriously affected, and the risk of mental health problems was high. The present study sought to systematically evaluate the mental health problems of healthcare workers worldwide during the pandemic and to determine the latest global frequency of COVID-19 associated mental health problems. Methods Data in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Elsevier, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Web of Science before November 11, 2022, were systematically searched. Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies were included. The meta-analysis used a random effects model to synthesize the comprehensive prevalence rate of mental health problems. Subgroup analyses were performed based on time of data collection; whether the country was or was not developed; continent; doctors and nurses; doctors/nurses vs. other healthcare workers; and psychological evaluation scale. Results A total of 161 studies were included, including 341,014 healthcare workers worldwide, with women accounting for 82.8%. Occupationally, 16.2% of the healthcare workers were doctors, 63.6% were nurses and 13.3% were other medical staff. During the pandemic, 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35–60%) of healthcare workers reported job burnout, 38% (95% CI, 35–41%) experienced anxiety, 34% (95% CI 30–38%) reported depression, 30% (95% CI, 29–31%) had acute stress disorder, and 26% (95% CI, 21–31%) had post-traumatic stress disorder. Conclusions The study found that there were common mental health problems among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common was job burnout, followed by anxiety, depression, acute stress and post-traumatic stress disorder. Although the global pandemic has been brought under control, its long-term impact on the mental health of healthcare workers cannot be ignored. Additional research is required to develop measures to prevent, monitor and treat psychological disorders among healthcare workers.

multidisciplinary sciences
Mental health outcomes in frontline healthcare workers in Brazil during the COVID-19 epidemic: Results of an online survey in four regions using respondent-driven sampling (RDS)

Mírian Cohen,Ricardo B Cardoso,Ligia R F S Kerr,Carl Kendall,Rosa L F Almeida,Nayê B Schneider,Carolina M Viera,Jorge G Zaduchliver,Andriele A Castro,Francisco M L Pinheiro,Maria F P M Albuquerque,Luana N G C Lima,Maria A S M Veras,Celina M T Martelli,Luciane N Cruz,Suzi A Camey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152402

Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed health facilities and presented healthcare workers (HCWs) with a new infectious disease threat. In addition to a sanitary crisis, Brazil still had to face major political, economic, and social challenges. This study aimed to investigate mental health outcomes in frontline HCWs in different regions of the country and at different epidemic times. We also sought to identify the main risk factors associated with these outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey using respondent-driven sampling was conducted to recruit physicians (n = 584), nurses (n = 997), and nurse technicians (n = 524) in 4 regions of Brazil (North, Northeast, Southeast, and South) from August 2020 to July 2021. We used standardized instruments to screen for common mental disorders (CMD)(SRQ-20), alcohol misuse (AUDIT-C), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)(PCL-5). Gile's successive sampling estimator was used to produce weighted estimates. We created a three-cluster data set for each HCW category and developed a hierarchical regression model with three levels: individual characteristics; workplace-related aspects; COVID-19 personal experience. The impact of the epidemic moment on the outcomes was also studied. Results: The prevalence of probable CMD was 26.8-36.9%, alcohol misuse 8.7-13.6%, depression 16.4-21.2%, anxiety 10.8-14.2%, and PTSD 5.9-8.0%. We found a stronger association between mental health outcomes and the following factors: history of psychiatric disorders, female gender, and clinical comorbidities (level 1); work overload and family isolation (level 2); sick leave (level 3). Epidemic variables, such as the number of deaths and trend of deaths by COVID-19, had almost no impact on the outcomes. Conclusion: An alarmingly high prevalence of depression and anxiety was found in Brazilian frontline HCWs. Individual factors were the most strongly associated with mental health outcomes. These findings indicate the need to develop programs that provide emotional support, identify professionals at risk and refer them to specialized treatment when necessary.
Mental Health Outcomes in Australian Healthcare and Aged-Care Workers during the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sarah L. McGuinness,Josphin Johnson,Owen Eades,Peter A. Cameron,Andrew Forbes,Jane Fisher,Kelsey Grantham,Carol Hodgson,Peter Hunter,Jessica Kasza,Helen L. Kelsall,Maggie Kirkman,Grant Russell,Philip L. Russo,Malcolm R. Sim,Kasha P. Singh,Helen Skouteris,Karen L. Smith,Rhonda L. Stuart,Helena J. Teede,James M. Trauer,Andrew Udy,Sophia Zoungas,Karin Leder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094951

IF: 4.614

2022-04-19

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Objective: the COVID-19 pandemic has incurred psychological risks for healthcare workers (HCWs). We established a Victorian HCW cohort (the Coronavirus in Victorian Healthcare and Aged-Care Workers (COVIC-HA) cohort study) to examine COVID-19 impacts on HCWs and assess organisational responses over time. Methods: mixed-methods cohort study, with baseline data collected via an online survey (7 May–18 July 2021) across four healthcare settings: ambulance, hospitals, primary care, and residential aged-care. Outcomes included self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress (PTS), wellbeing, burnout, and resilience, measured using validated tools. Work and home-related COVID-19 impacts and perceptions of workplace responses were also captured. Results: among 984 HCWs, symptoms of clinically significant depression, anxiety, and PTS were reported by 22.5%, 14.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, highest among paramedics and nurses. Emotional exhaustion reflecting moderate–severe burnout was reported by 65.1%. Concerns about contracting COVID-19 at work and transmitting COVID-19 were common, but 91.2% felt well-informed on workplace changes and 78.3% reported that support services were available. Conclusions: Australian HCWs employed during 2021 experienced adverse mental health outcomes, with prevalence differences observed according to occupation. Longitudinal evidence is needed to inform workplace strategies that support the physical and mental wellbeing of HCWs at organisational and state policy levels.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Healthcare Worker Mental Health After the Initial Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: a US Medical Center Cross-Sectional Survey

Michael J. Van Wert,Sonal Gandhi,Ishaan Gupta,Amteshwar Singh,Shaker M. Eid,M. Haroon Burhanullah,Henry Michtalik,Mansoor Malik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07251-0

IF: 5.7

2022-01-06

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUNDThere is a paucity of data on the mental health impact of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on United States (US) healthcare workers (HCWs) after the first surge in the spring of 2020.OBJECTIVETo determine the impact of the pandemic on HCWs, and the relationship between HCW mental health and demographics, occupational factors, and COVID-19 concerns.DESIGNCross-sectional survey in an urban medical center (September–November 2020) in Baltimore, MD, in the United States.PARTICIPANTSA total of 605 HCWs (physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, physician assistants, patient care technicians, respiratory therapists, social workers, mental health therapists, and case managers).MAIN MEASURESMeasures of mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire-2, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 4a, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Maslach Burnout Inventory-2 item, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 item), demographics, occupational factors, and COVID-19 related concerns.KEY RESULTSFifty-two percent of 1198 HCWs responded to the survey and 14.2% reported depression, 43.1% mild or higher anxiety, 31.6% sleep disturbance, 22.3% posttraumatic stress symptoms, 21.6% depersonalization, 46.0% emotional exhaustion, and 23.1% lower resilience. Relative to HCWs providing in-person care to COVID-19 infected patients none of their working days, those doing so all or most days were more likely to experience worse depression (adjusted odds ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.3–11.7), anxiety (aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.4–6.3), possible PTSD symptoms (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1–5.8), and higher burnout (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1–6.0). Worse mental health in several domains was associated with higher health fear (aORs ranged from 2.2 to 5.0), job stressors (aORs ranged from 1.9 to 4.0), perceived social stigma/avoidance (aORs ranged from 1.8 to 2.9), and workplace safety concerns (aORs ranged from 1.8 to 2.8).CONCLUSIONSUS HCWs experienced significant mental health symptoms eight months into the pandemic. More time spent providing in-person care to COVID-19-infected patients and greater COVID-19-related concerns were consistently associated with worse mental health.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Large-eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a non-premixed CO/H2 temporally evolving jet flame

Yue Yang,Haifeng Wang,S. Pope,Jacqueline H. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCI.2012.08.015

Abstract:

Handling Knowledge-Based Decision Making Issues in Collaborative Settings: An Integrated Approach

Association of depressive symptoms with incidence and mortality rates of COVID-19 over 2 years among healthcare workers in 20 countries: multi-country serial cross-sectional study

Inequality on the frontline: A multi-country study on gender differences in mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

The caregiving work experience of healthcare workers in Chile during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health: A qualitative study based on the international initiative HEROES

Effects of sugars and other substances upon nerve.

Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers in different regions of the world

Hospital workers mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: methods of data collection and characteristics of study sample in a university hospital in Milan (Italy)

[Intradermal administration of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis].

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers in Italy: Analyzing the Role of Individual and Workplace-Level Factors in the Reopening Phase After Lockdown

Impact of COVID-19 first wave on the mental health of healthcare workers in a Front-Line Spanish Tertiary Hospital: lessons learned

Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among frontline healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers at acute hospital settings in the South-East of Ireland: an observational cohort multicentre study

Fear of the unknown: Experience of frontline healthcare workers with coping strategies used to face the COVID 19 pandemic

Mental Health of Guatemalan Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Baseline Findings From the HEROES Cohort Study

Impact of COVID-19 on mental health of health care workers in Spain: a mix-methods study

Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Mental health status and related factors influencing healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mental health outcomes in frontline healthcare workers in Brazil during the COVID-19 epidemic: Results of an online survey in four regions using respondent-driven sampling (RDS)

Mental Health Outcomes in Australian Healthcare and Aged-Care Workers during the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Healthcare Worker Mental Health After the Initial Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic: a US Medical Center Cross-Sectional Survey

Large-eddy simulation/probability density function modeling of a non-premixed CO/H2 temporally evolving jet flame