Abstract:Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the world witnessed a partisan segregation of beliefs toward the global health crisis and its management. Politically motivated reasoning, the tendency to interpret information in accordance with individual motives to protect valued beliefs rather than objectively considering the facts, could represent a key process involved in the polarization of attitudes. The objective of this study was to explore politically motivated reasoning when participants assess information regarding COVID-19. Design: We carried out a preregistered online experiment using a diverse sample (N = 1,500) from the United States. Both Republicans and Democrats assessed the same COVID-19-related information about the health effects of lockdowns, social distancing, vaccination, hydroxychloroquine, and wearing face masks. Results: At odds with our prestated hypothesis, we found no evidence in line with politically motivated reasoning when interpreting numerical information about COVID-19. Moreover, we found no evidence supporting the idea that numeric ability or cognitive sophistication bolster politically motivated reasoning in the case of COVID-19. Instead, our findings suggest that participants base their assessment on prior beliefs of the matter. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that politically polarized attitudes toward COVID-19 are more likely to be driven by lack of reasoning than politically motivated reasoning-a finding that opens potential avenues for combating political polarization about important health care topics. Highlights: Participants assessed numerical information regarding the effect of different COVID-19 policies.We found no evidence in line with politically motivated reasoning when interpreting numerical information about COVID-19.Participants tend to base their assessment of COVID-19-related facts on prior beliefs of the matter.Politically polarized attitudes toward COVID-19 are more a result of lack of thinking than partisanship.

Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries

COVID-19 and Politically Motivated Reasoning

The Politicization of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Beliefs About COVID-19 in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Novel Test of Political Polarization and Motivated Reasoning

How populists fuel polarization and fail their response to COVID-19: An empirical analysis

Ideological polarization during a pandemic: Tracking the alignment of attitudes toward COVID containment policies and left-right self-identification

Political polarization and health

Depolarized by the Media? The Role of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Traditional and Digital Media Diets in Issue Polarization Around COVID-19 in the United States

Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic

Regional and Temporal Patterns of Partisan Polarization during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States and Canada

Political polarization may affect attitudes towards vaccination. An analysis based on the European Social Survey data from 23 countries

Affective partisan polarization and moral dilemmas during the COVID-19 pandemic

Partisanship and the Pandemic: How and Why Americans Followed Party Cues on COVID-19

Asymmetric affective polarization regarding COVID-19 vaccination in six European countries

Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides

Polarized opinions on Covid-19 and environmental policy measures. The role of social media use and personal concerns in German-speaking countries.

Motivated reasoning and political ideology fueled political polarization regarding COVID-19 health recommendations in Spanish society: an experimental study

Longitudinal attenuation in political polarization: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination adherence in Brazil

Affective and interactional polarization align across countries

COVID-19 and social media: Beyond polarization

Political identity and risk politics: Evidence from a pandemic