Nuclear Deformation in Mechanotransduction: A New Role for Heterogeneity.
Yuan Hong,Yuan Li,Feng Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2020.11.2281
IF: 3.4
2021-01-01
Biophysical Journal
Abstract:When a cell is stressed, the nucleus deforms. In many cases, the stress and the nuclear deformation have only minor effects on a few processes within the cell, but in others, notably in the case of internal stresses arising from patterning mesenchymal stem cells on stiff substrata, the stresses can lead to major transformations in the genes that are expressed by a cell (1Kilian K.A. Bugarija B. Mrksich M. et al.Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010; 107: 4872-4877Crossref PubMed Scopus (1322) Google Scholar). As the stiffest organelle in eukaryotic cells, nuclei are thought to sense and resist the extracellular mechanical stress and protect the genetic cargo from stress-induced damage (2Swift J. Ivanovska I.L. Discher D.E. et al.Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation.Science. 2013; 341: 1240104Crossref PubMed Scopus (1083) Google Scholar,3Uhler C. Shivashankar G.V. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18: 717-727Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). Can nuclear deformation contribute to this mechanotransduction, meaning in this case, the ability of a cell to detect and respond to mechanical force? Resolving this question is a major focus of the field of mechanobiology. This question is important because if the nucleus and the transcription of DNA within it are indeed sensitive to deformation, uncovering the sources of nuclear deformation and of the associated changes to DNA transcription might help unlock new pathways to curing disease and facilitating tissue engineering. Understanding how nuclei deform under stress is critical to revealing mechanisms of mechanotransduction, nuclear rupture, and DNA damage (3Uhler C. Shivashankar G.V. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18: 717-727Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). For instance, forces applied to nuclei can lead to nuclear translocation of yes-associated protein (YAP), which acts as a mechanosensitive transcriptional regulator meditating cell behaviors, such as proliferation and apoptosis (4Elosegui-Artola A. Andreu I. Roca-Cusachs P. et al.Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores.Cell. 2017; 171: 1397-1410.e14Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (498) Google Scholar). Moreover, nuclei can modulate their own mechanical stiffness, possibly to accord with the mechanical environment of a cell (2Swift J. Ivanovska I.L. Discher D.E. et al.Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation.Science. 2013; 341: 1240104Crossref PubMed Scopus (1083) Google Scholar) or to prevent DNA damage in a stress amplitude and frequency-dependent manner (5Nava M.M. Miroshnikova Y.A. Wickström S.A. et al.Heterochromatin-driven nuclear softening protects the genome against mechanical stress-induced damage.Cell. 2020; 181: 800-817.e22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar). If this is so important, why not just look? Because of the challenges associated with experiments at this level, integrated mathematical modeling and experiments have always been required to interpret experimental results, but again because of the challenges associated with experiments at this level, the ways to construct these mathematical models have not been clear. One sensible approach to model the deformation of nuclei under stress is to consider the nuclear lamin as a tension-stiffening, fibrous material while treating the chromatin within the nucleus as homogeneous elastic material (6Alisafaei F. Jokhun D.S. Shenoy V.B. et al.Regulation of nuclear architecture, mechanics, and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of epigenetic factors by cell geometric constraints.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019; 116: 13200-13209Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar). However, this is only sensible until the results are compared to the experiment, which differ from these predictions by three orders of magnitude in nuclear shear modulus (7Caille N. Thoumine O. Meister J.J. et al.Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells.J. Biomech. 2002; 35: 177-187Crossref PubMed Scopus (411) Google Scholar,8Vaziri A. Mofrad M.R.K. Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment.J. Biomech. 2007; 40: 2053-2062Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar). Something has been missing. One place to look for the discrepancy is the mechanics of chromatin, which is highly dependent on the degree of DNA packing into chromatin, a factor that can change with gene expression (3Uhler C. Shivashankar G.V. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18: 717-727Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). Another is the way that chromosomes distribute in "territories" (3Uhler C. Shivashankar G.V. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18: 717-727Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar), heterogeneous domains that might introduce heterogeneity into nuclear deformation. In this issue of Biophysical Journal, Reynolds et al. (9Reynolds N. McEvoy E. McGarry P. et al.Image-derived modeling of nucleus strain amplification associated with chromatin heterogeneity.Biophys. J. 2021; 120: 1323-1332Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (7) Google Scholar) combine imaging and numerical modeling to report the discovery that the latter factor controls the deformation of the nucleus. At the core of this is some exquisite imaging of nuclear 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) stain that reveals a heterogeneous mess. However, when combined with computational modeling to investigate the impact of DNA content on nuclear shear moduli, this heterogeneity sorted out neatly into three phases of distinct stiffness. mRNA-abundant interchromatin regions is the least stiff phase (shear moduli of 0.17–0.63 kPa, for those keeping score) and also the most abundant phase, occupying the highest fraction of nuclear volume (∼2/3). Euchromatin is the intermediate stiffness phase (1.5–2.7 kPa) and heterochromatin the stiffest (3.6–4.0 kPa). What does this mean for the field of mechanobiology? At the simplest level, the abundant compliant phase explains the underestimation of nuclear modulus measured by micropipette aspiration assays (8Vaziri A. Mofrad M.R.K. Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment.J. Biomech. 2007; 40: 2053-2062Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar) compared to parallel plates assays (7Caille N. Thoumine O. Meister J.J. et al.Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells.J. Biomech. 2002; 35: 177-187Crossref PubMed Scopus (411) Google Scholar). More broadly, the results shed light on how cytoskeletal contractility, which regulates nuclear deformation, might be transmitted to the nucleus. High actomyosin contractility deforms nuclei by transmitting stress to nuclei through the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex (3Uhler C. Shivashankar G.V. Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18: 717-727Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar) and can stiffen the nuclear lamina by increasing nuclear tension and elevating the expression of lamin A(2). Low contractility decreases nuclear tension and microtubule buckling, leading to the nuclear indentation by the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) (6Alisafaei F. Jokhun D.S. Shenoy V.B. et al.Regulation of nuclear architecture, mechanics, and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of epigenetic factors by cell geometric constraints.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019; 116: 13200-13209Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar). These new data from Reynolds et al. (9Reynolds N. McEvoy E. McGarry P. et al.Image-derived modeling of nucleus strain amplification associated with chromatin heterogeneity.Biophys. J. 2021; 120: 1323-1332Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (7) Google Scholar) reveal that these effects of contractility are magnified as elevated strains in the compliant, mRNA-abundant interchromatin regions and that these compliant regions thus govern how stress reshapes nuclei. These results also highlight the importance of stress-modulated nuclear lamina stiffness to impede the propagation of stress to DNA and maintain homeostasis (2Swift J. Ivanovska I.L. Discher D.E. et al.Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation.Science. 2013; 341: 1240104Crossref PubMed Scopus (1083) Google Scholar). Consistent with this, Reynolds et al. (9Reynolds N. McEvoy E. McGarry P. et al.Image-derived modeling of nucleus strain amplification associated with chromatin heterogeneity.Biophys. J. 2021; 120: 1323-1332Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (7) Google Scholar) observed a fourfold increase of strain in the low stiffness nuclear phases after lamin A/C depletion, with strain in the high stiffness phases unaltered. These data shed light on recent reports of discontinuous chromatin protrusions in lamin deficiency skeletal muscle cells (10Earle A.J. Kirby T.J. Lammerding J. et al.Mutant lamins cause nuclear envelope rupture and DNA damage in skeletal muscle cells.Nat. Mater. 2020; 19: 464-473Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar) and suggest ways that depletion of lamin, which decreases cell contractility (6Alisafaei F. Jokhun D.S. Shenoy V.B. et al.Regulation of nuclear architecture, mechanics, and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of epigenetic factors by cell geometric constraints.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019; 116: 13200-13209Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar), may possibly lead to recursive cycles that culminate in pathology. The new model of nuclear heterogeneity provides insight into how nuclear deformation may be amplified, possibly to enable mechanotransduction. Are we closer to showing that deformation-induced alterations of the spatial distribution of chromatin lead to changes in gene expression? More experimentation is certainly needed, and the details of how the LINC complex connects to heterogeneity should be investigated further (Fig. 1). But this advance shows us that interactions between chromosome territories yield inhomogeneous strain fields that are a potential catalyst of changes in gene transcription through deformation-induced interchromatin gene interactions. Y.H., Y.L., and F.X. wrote the article. The schematic was created using BioRender. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 11972280 , 11761161004 ). Image-derived modeling of nucleus strain amplification associated with chromatin heterogeneityReynolds et al.Biophysical JournalMarch 3, 2021In BriefBeyond the critical role of cell nuclei in gene expression and DNA replication, they also have a significant influence on cell mechanosensation and migration. Nuclear stiffness can impact force transmission and, furthermore, act as a physical barrier to translocation across tight spaces. As such, it is of wide interest to accurately characterize nucleus mechanical behavior. In this study, we present a computational investigation of the in situ deformation of a heterogeneous chondrocyte nucleus. A methodology is developed to accurately reconstruct a three-dimensional finite-element model of a cell nucleus from confocal microscopy. Full-Text PDF Open Archive