Reliability of patient self-report of cognition, awareness, and consciousness during seizures

Charlie W Zhao,Rahiwa Gebre,Yigit Baykara,William Chen,Petr Vitkovskiy,Ningcheng Li,Michelle Johnson,Eric Y Chen,Dan Kluger,Hal Blumenfeld
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51485
Abstract:Objective: Clinicians rely on patient self-report of impairment during seizures for decisions including driving eligibility. However, the reliability of patient reports on cognitive and behavioral functions during seizures remains unknown. Methods: We administered a daily questionnaire to epilepsy patients undergoing continuous video-EEG monitoring, asking about responsiveness, speech, memory, awareness, and consciousness during seizures in the preceding 24 hours. We also administered a questionnaire upon admission about responsiveness, speech, and awareness during seizures. Subjective questionnaire answers were compared with objective behavioral ratings on video review. Criteria for agreement were Cohen's kappa >0.60 and proportions of positive and negative agreement both >0.75. Results: We analyzed 86 epileptic seizures in 39 patients. Memory report on the daily questionnaire met criteria for agreement with video review (κ = 0.674 for early, 0.743 for late recall). Subjective report of awareness also met agreement criteria with video ratings of memory (κ = 0.673 early, 0.774 late). Concordance for speech was relatively good (κ = 0.679) but did not meet agreement criteria, nor did responsiveness or consciousness. On the admission questionnaire, agreement criteria were met for subjective report of awareness versus video ratings of memory (κ = 0.814 early, 0.806 late), but not for other comparisons. Interpretation: Patient self-report of memory or awareness showed the best concordance with objective memory impairment during seizures. Self-report of impairment in other categories was less reliable. These findings suggest that patient reports about impaired memory during seizures may be most reliable, and otherwise determining functional impairments should be based on objective observations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?