Abstract:A rational design strategy for the non‐fullerene acceptors is presented to mitigate inherent recombination losses in bulk heterojunction blends. Systematic spectroscopic and device physical analyses based on various chemical analogs showed that weakly coupled donating and accepting units with two‐dimensionally extended conjugation promotes the translation of luminescent properties of molecules to recombination centers without additional non‐radiative losses. Non‐fullerene acceptors (NFAs) have demonstrated a great potential for the transcendence of performance limits in organic photovoltaics. Despite the tremendous efforts, however, synthetic control of non‐ideal recombination losses on the photovoltage are still elusive and thus lag far behind the inorganic counterparts. Here, a rational design strategy of non‐fullerene acceptors is presented to overcome the limitations derived from the inherent excited state properties of organic molecules. Spectroscopic studies on a series of chemical analogs of ladder‐type fused acceptors reveal that the radiative efficiency of non‐fullerene acceptors is predominantly determined by the inherently strong electron‐vibration coupling of their bound excited states, rather than the redistribution of molecular orbitals itself. In this sense, regardless of intramolecular charge transfer characteristics, the incorporation of rigid, and planar moiety with wide π plane is found to promote the dominance of long‐lived and weakly‐bound excited states in the photophysical process, in which the mitigated non‐radiative decays of NFAs can be directly translated into that of charge‐transfer states. Furthermore, the incorporation of such chemical moiety can minimize the evolution of subgap broadening in the bulk heterojunction blends, lowering the contribution of non‐ideal radiative losses. As a result, the model systems demonstrate the non‐radiative loss down to 180–190 meV, without sacrificing photocurrent generations, reaching that of inorganic counterparts.

Isomerization Strategy of Nonfullerene Small‐Molecule Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells

Rational Design Non-Fullerene Acceptor-Based High Efficiency BHJ Polymer Solar Cells Through Theoretical Investigations

Side-chain engineering of nonfullerene small-molecule acceptors for organic solar cells

Asymmetric molecular engineering in recent nonfullerene acceptors for efficient organic solar cells

Progress in Non‐Fullerene Acceptors: Evolution from Small to Giant Molecules

Unveiling symmetry: a comparative analysis of asymmetric and symmetric non-fullerene acceptors in organic solar cells

Low-Bandgap Non-fullerene Acceptors Enabling High-Performance Organic Solar Cells

Molecular Design Motifs of Non‐Fullerene Acceptors for Mitigating All Inherent Non‐Ideal Energy Losses in Organic Photovoltaics

Exploring structure–property landscape of non-fullerene acceptors for organic solar cells

Facile access to high-performance organic solar cells through an A-D1-D2-A type unfused non-fullerene acceptors

Three Isomeric Non-Fullerene Acceptors Comprising a Mono-Brominated End-Group for Efficient Organic Solar Cells

Intrinsically Chemo- and Thermostable Electron Acceptors for Efficient Organic Solar Cells

Nonfused Nonfullerene Acceptors with an A-D-A'-D-A Framework and a Benzothiadiazole Core for High-Performance Organic Solar Cells.

Deciphering the Role of Chalcogen-Containing Heterocycles in Nonfullerene Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells

Chemical Design Rules for Non‐Fullerene Acceptors in Organic Solar Cells

A History and Perspective of Non‐Fullerene Electron Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells

Introducing thiazole units into small-molecule acceptors for efficient non-fullerene organic solar cells

3D Acceptors with Multiple A-D-A Architectures for Highly Efficient Organic Solar Cells

Recent Advances in Selenium‐Containing Non‐fullerene Acceptors for High‐Performance Organic Solar Cells

Organic Solar Cells Based on Non-Fullerene Low Molecular Weight Organic Semiconductor Molecules

A review of nonfullerene solar cells: Insight into the correlation among molecular structure, morphology, and device performance