An evaluation of treatment response and remission definitions in adult obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis
Divya Ramakrishnan,Luis C Farhat,Edoardo F Q Vattimo,Jessica L S Levine,Jessica A Johnson,Bekir B Artukoglu,Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger,Abraham Zangen,Antoine Pelissolo,Carlos A de B Pereira,Christian Rück,Daniel L C Costa,David Mataix-Cols,David Shannahoff-Khalsa,David F Tolin,Elham Zarean,Elisabeth Meyer,Emily R Hawken,Eric A Storch,Erik Andersson,Euripedes C Miguel,Giuseppe Maina,James F Leckman,Jerome Sarris,John S March,Juliana B Diniz,Kenneth Kobak,Luc Mallet,Nienke C C Vulink,Revital Amiaz,Rodrigo Yacubian Fernandes,Roseli G Shavitt,Sabine Wilhelm,Shahrokh Golshan,Sophie Tezenas du Montcel,Stefano Erzegovesi,Upasana Baruah,William M Greenberg,Yuki Kobayashi,Michael H Bloch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.044
Abstract:Introduction: Expert consensus operationalized treatment response and remission in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as a Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) reduction ≥35% and score ≤12 with ≤2 on Clinical Global Impressions Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S) scales, respectively. However, there has been scant empirical evidence supporting these definitions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with OCD to determine optimal Y-BOCS thresholds for response and remission. We estimated pooled sensitivity/specificity for each percent reduction threshold (response) or posttreatment score (remission) to determine response and remission defined by a CGI-I and CGI-S ≤ 2, respectively. Results: Individual participant data from 25 of 94 eligible RCTs (1235 participants) were included. The optimal threshold for response was ≥30% Y-BOCS reduction and for remission was ≤15 posttreatment Y-BOCS. However, differences in sensitivity and specificity between the optimal and nearby thresholds for response and remission were small with some uncertainty demonstrated by the confidence ellipses. Conclusion: While the empirically derived Y-BOCS thresholds in our meta-analysis differ from expert consensus, given the predominance of data from more recent trials of OCD, which involved more refractory participants and novel treatment modalities as opposed to first-line therapies, we recommend the continued use of the consensus definitions.