Abstract:Background: Recent developments in causal inference and machine learning (ML) allow for the estimation of individualized treatment effects (ITEs), which reveal whether treatment effectiveness varies according to patients' observed covariates. ITEs can be used to stratify health policy decisions according to individual characteristics and potentially achieve greater population health. Little is known about the appropriateness of available ML methods for use in health technology assessment. Methods: In this scoping review, we evaluate ML methods available for estimating ITEs, aiming to help practitioners assess their suitability in health technology assessment. We present a taxonomy of ML approaches, categorized by key challenges in health technology assessment using observational data, including handling time-varying confounding and time-to event data and quantifying uncertainty. Results: We found a wide range of algorithms for simpler settings with baseline confounding and continuous or binary outcomes. Not many ML algorithms can handle time-varying or unobserved confounding, and at the time of writing, no ML algorithm was capable of estimating ITEs for time-to-event outcomes while accounting for time-varying confounding. Many of the ML algorithms that estimate ITEs in longitudinal settings do not formally quantify uncertainty around the point estimates. Limitations: This scoping review may not cover all relevant ML methods and algorithms as they are continuously evolving. Conclusions: Existing ML methods available for ITE estimation are limited in handling important challenges posed by observational data when used for cost-effectiveness analysis, such as time-to-event outcomes, time-varying and hidden confounding, or the need to estimate sampling uncertainty around the estimates. Implications: ML methods are promising but need further development before they can be used to estimate ITEs for health technology assessments. Highlights: Estimating individualized treatment effects (ITEs) using observational data and machine learning (ML) can support personalized treatment advice and help deliver more customized information on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of health technologies.ML methods for ITE estimation are mostly designed for handling confounding at baseline but not time-varying or unobserved confounding. The few models that account for time-varying confounding are designed for continuous or binary outcomes, not time-to-event outcomes.Not all ML methods for estimating ITEs can quantify the uncertainty of their predictions.Future work on developing ML that addresses the concerns summarized in this review is needed before these methods can be widely used in clinical and health technology assessment-like decision making.

Estimating individualized treatment effects using an individual participant data meta-analysis

An Introduction to Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

A tutorial on individualized treatment effect prediction from randomized trials with a binary endpoint

Measuring the individualization potential of treatment individualization rules: Application to rules built with a new parametric interaction model for parallel-group clinical trials

A Perspective on Individualized Treatment Effects Estimation from Time-series Health Data

Do machine learning methods lead to similar individualized treatment rules? A comparison study on real data

Random-effects Meta-Analysis of Combined Outcomes Based on Reconstructions of Individual Patient Data

The Personalized Advantage Index: Translating Research on Prediction into Individualized Treatment Recommendations. A Demonstration

Optimal Statistical Inference for Individualized Treatment Effects in High-dimensional Models

Emulate randomized clinical trials using heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for personalized treatments: Methodology review and benchmark

Uncovering individualised treatment effects for educational trials

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Personalized Medicine With Software

Deep Representation Learning for Individualized Treatment Effect Estimation Using Electronic Health Records.

Estimating individual treatment effects on COPD exacerbations by causal machine learning on randomised controlled trials

A Large Scale Benchmark for Individual Treatment Effect Prediction and Uplift Modeling

Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome

Machine Learning Methods to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Use in Health Technology Assessment

Individualized treatment effect was predicted best by modeling baseline risk in interaction with treatment assignment

Estimating causal effects for binary outcomes using per-decision inverse probability weighting

A propensity score weighting approach to integrate aggregated data in random-effect individual-level data meta-analysis