STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific marker for STK11 adnexal tumours

Amir Dehghani,Aarti E Sharma,Stephanie E Siegmund,Chrystalle K Carreon,Colin J R Stewart,Fabiola Medeiros,Jelena Mirkovic,Marisa R Nucci,Christopher P Crum,Jason L Hornick,Brooke E Howitt,W Glenn McCluggage,David L Kolin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15303
2024-08-24
Histopathology
Abstract:STK11 adnexal tumour is a rare, malignant neoplasm that is associated with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, and previously required sequencing for diagnosis. We show that loss of expression of STK11 immunohistochemistry is a reliable surrogate for molecular studies to differentiate STK11 adnexal tumours from morphological mimics. Aims ST11 adnexal tumour is a rare, recently described malignant neoplasm that is associated with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. It predominantly originates from the para‐adnexal soft tissues and often shows secondary involvement of the fallopian tube and ovary. STK11 adnexal tumours have a broad differential diagnosis due to their variable morphology and non‐specific immunoprofile, and diagnostic confirmation currently requires sequencing to identify an STK11 mutation. We investigate the diagnostic utility of STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a cohort of STK11 adnexal tumours and morphological mimics. Methods and results IHC for STK11 was performed on 122 tumours, including 17 STK11 adnexal tumours and 105 morphological mimics (10 female adnexal tumours of Wolffian origin, 22 adult granulosa cell tumours, 10 juvenile granulosa cell tumours, four Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours, two Leydig cell tumours, one Sertoli cell tumour, one steroid cell tumour, four extra‐ovarian sex cord‐stromal tumours, 16 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, eight tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinomas, five ovarian mesonephric‐like adenocarcinomas, 14 ovarian carcinosarcomas, five peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas, two pelvic plexiform leiomyomata and one ovarian solid pseudopapillary tumour). All STK11 adnexal tumours showed complete loss of cytoplasmic staining for STK11. All other tumour types showed retained cytoplasmic staining, except for one endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation which showed complete loss of STK11 expression and a high‐grade serous carcinoma with subclonal loss. Conclusions STK11 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing STK11 adnexal tumour from its histological mimics, and can obviate the need for confirmatory molecular studies in the appropriate morphological context.
pathology,cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?