Prognostic role of ELF test compared to liver biopsy in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)
A. Liguori,F. D'Ambrosio,N. Viceconti,F. Termite,L. Petrucci,R. Beschi,M. Orienti,S. Galletti,S. Cardinali,L. Riccardi,M. Garcovich,F. Pizzolante,N. De Matthaeis,M.A. Zocco,M.E. Ainora,M.C. Giustiniani,G. Marrone,M. Biolato,C Cefalo,F.M. Vecchio,A. Grieco,A. Urbani,M. Sanguinetti,A. Gasbarrini,L. Miele,Cefalo C
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.018
IF: 5.165
2024-02-01
Digestive and Liver Disease
Abstract:Introduction Liver fibrosis is the strongest predictor of liver-related events (LRE) in patients with MASLD. The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score is a composite of direct fibrosis biomarkers that reflect extracellular matrix turnover. ELF test shows high diagnostic accuracy for advanced liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD but its utility as a prognostic biomarker is still unclear. Aim The aim of our study is to compare the prognostic effectiveness of ELF, FIB4 and liver histology in patients with MASLD. Materials and Methods We retrospectively enrolled 289 patients with MASLD. ELF score was determined using a serum sample collected at baseline. FIB4 computation and liver biopsy were performed at baseline. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation or cirrhosis complications (ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, MELD≥15). Considering existing literature cut-offs, subjects were stratified accordingly to ELF (≤9.8, 9.8-11.3, ≥11.3), FIB-4 (<1.3, 1.3-2·67, >2.67) and histology (F0-2, F3, F4) to assess risk of occurrence of primary outcome. Results We included data of 289 patients (30.4% female, median age 50y [IQR 39-58]). After a median follow-up of 41 months [IQR 21-68], the composite endpoint was observed in 11.8% of patients. There was a stepwise increase in the incidence of primary outcome according with ELF ≤9.8 (0.5%), 9.8-11.2 (14.5%), ≥11.3 (69.7%). Survival curves for pairwise comparisons between groups showed significant differences according to pre-defined histological and NITs stratification (p<0.05). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, ELF and liver histology were significant predictors of the primary outcome after adjusting for gender, diabetes, age, BMI. (ELF >11.2vs<9.8 HR 135.4 [95%CI 15.9-1149.0 p<0.01], 9.8-11.2vs<9.8 HR 22.5 [95%CI 2.7-183.9 p<0.01]) (F4vs0-2 HR 216.6 [95%CI 23.5-1999.2 p<0.01], F3vs0-2 HR 5.44 [95%CI 1.0-30.9 p=0.05]). Conclusions ELF, a simple non-invasive blood test, performed as well as histologically assessed fibrosis in predicting clinical outcomes and should be considered as alternative to liver biopsy for prognostic assessment in patients with MASLD.
gastroenterology & hepatology