Abstract:Encouraging sustainable mobility patterns is at the forefront of policymaking at all scales of governance as the collective consciousness surrounding climate change continues to expand. Not every community, however, possesses the necessary economic or socio-cultural capital to encourage modal shifts away from private motorized vehicles towards active modes. The current literature on `soft' policy emphasizes the importance of tailoring behavior change campaigns to individual or geographic context. Yet, there is a lack of insight and appropriate tools to promote active mobility and overcome transport disadvantage from the local community perspective. The current study investigates the promotion of walking and cycling adoption using a series of focus groups with local residents in two geographic communities, namely Chicago's (1) Humboldt Park neighborhood and (2) suburb of Evanston. The research approach combines traditional qualitative discourse analysis with quantitative text-mining tools, namely topic modeling and sentiment analysis. The analysis uncovers the local mobility culture, embedded norms and values associated with acceptance of active travel modes in different communities. We observe that underserved populations within diverse communities view active mobility simultaneously as a necessity and as a symbol of privilege that is sometimes at odds with the local culture. The mixed methods approach to analyzing community member discourses is translated into policy findings that are either tailored to local context or broadly applicable to curbing automobile dominance. Overall, residents of both Humboldt Park and Evanston envision a society in which multimodalism replaces car-centrism, but differences in the local physical and social environments would and should influence the manner in which overarching policy objectives are met.

Valuing "Othered" Rationalities in the Smart City: Examining Children's Cycling from a Justice Perspective

The Right to the City in the Platform Age: Child-Friendly City and Smart City Premises in Contention

Community Smarts in Grassroots Initiatives to Support Cycling and Walking in Large Urban Areas

Envisioning of smart cycling in seven cities: Discourse analysis of official city documents

Smart Cities and (Smart) Cycling: Exploring the Synergies in Copenhagen and Amsterdam

Cities and Smart Technology: The Case of Cycling

Safe cycling space: How it is produced and experienced by cyclists

The Social Sustainable City: How to Involve Children in Designing and Planning for Urban Childhoods?

Ethics of Smart Cities: Towards Value-Sensitive Design and Co-Evolving City Life

Investigating Digitally Inflected Intercity Cycle Commuting

The Journey and the Destination Matter: Child-Friendly Cities and Children's Right to the City

Design for the Right to the Smart City in More-than-Human Worlds

When Connectivity Makes Safer Routes to School: Conclusions from Aggregate Data on Child Transportation in Shanghai

Where does active travel fit within local community narratives of mobility space and place?

Sidewalk and Toronto: Critical Systems Heuristics and the Smart City

Equity impacts of cycling: examining the spatial-social distribution of bicycle-related benefits

Improving cycling safety for children and youth

How smart is mobility in smart cities? An analysis of citizens' value perceptions through ICT applications

What is shared in shared bicycles? Mobility, space, and capital

Home-School Routes and Child Psychology: The Smartness in Small Steps

The Governance Challenge within Socio-Technical Transition Processes: Public Bicycles and Smartphone-Based Bicycles in Guangzhou, China