Abstract:Objectives: Visual and contextual cues facilitate speech recognition in suboptimal listening conditions (e.g., background noise, hearing loss, hearing aid signal processing). Moreover, successful speech recognition in challenging listening conditions is linked to cognitive abilities such as working memory and fluid intelligence. However, it is unclear which cognitive abilities facilitate the use of visual and contextual cues in individuals with normal hearing and hearing aid users. The first aim was to investigate whether individuals with hearing aid users rely on visual and contextual cues to a higher degree than individuals with normal hearing in a speech-in-noise recognition task. The second aim was to investigate whether working memory and fluid intelligence are associated with the use of visual and contextual cues in these groups. Design: Groups of participants with normal hearing and hearing aid users with bilateral, symmetrical mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss were included (n = 169 per group). The Samuelsson and Rönnberg task was administered to measure speech recognition in speech-shaped noise. The task consists of an equal number of sentences administered in the auditory and audiovisual modalities, as well as without and with contextual cues (visually presented word preceding the sentence, e.g.,: "Restaurant"). The signal to noise ratio was individually set to 1 dB below the level obtained for 50% correct speech recognition in the hearing-in-noise test administered in the auditory modality. The Reading Span test was used to measure working memory capacity and the Raven test was used to measure fluid intelligence. The data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling. Results: Both groups exhibited significantly higher speech recognition performance when visual and contextual cues were available. Although the hearing aid users performed significantly worse compared to those with normal hearing in the auditory modality, both groups reached similar performance levels in the audiovisual modality. In addition, a significant positive relationship was found between the Raven test score and speech recognition performance only for the hearing aid users in the audiovisual modality. There was no significant relationship between Reading Span test score and performance. Conclusions: Both participants with normal hearing and hearing aid users benefitted from contextual cues, regardless of cognitive abilities. The hearing aid users relied on visual cues to compensate for the perceptual difficulties, reaching a similar performance level as the participants with normal hearing when visual cues were available, despite worse performance in the auditory modality. It is important to note that the hearing aid users who had higher fluid intelligence were able to capitalize on visual cues more successfully than those with poorer fluid intelligence, resulting in better speech-in-noise recognition performance.

Is Having Hearing Loss Fundamentally Different? Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling of the Effect of Cognitive Functioning on Speech Identification

Age-Related Hearing Loss, Cognitive Decline, and Social Interaction: Testing a Framework

Individual differences in the perception of phonetic category structure predict speech-in-noise performance

Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise

Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss

Age Differences in Speech Perception in Noise and Sound Localization in Individuals With Subjective Normal Hearing

Effects of Noise Level and Cognitive Function on Speech Perception in Normal Elderly and Elderly with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Hearing Impairment, Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Cognitive Function: Longitudinal Analysis Using English Longitudinal Study on Ageing

Hearing and cognitive decline in aging differentially impact neural tracking of context-supported versus random speech across linguistic timescales

Relationships Between Hearing Status, Cognitive Abilities, and Reliance on Visual and Contextual Cues

Hearing in Noise Test for OIder AduIts with Age-reIated Hearing Loss

Effects of Age and Cognitive Functions on the Neural Tracking of Speech in Noise

Data from the Swedish "Good Aging in Skåne" Population Study

Pathophysiological and Clinical Aspects of Hearing Loss Among 85-Year-Olds

Study of Speech Recognition in Noise and Working Memory in Adults and Elderly with Normal Hearing

Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition

Age Impacts Speech-in-Noise Recognition Differently for Nonnative and Native Listeners

Cross-Sectional Associations of Peripheral Hearing, Brain Imaging, and Cognitive Performance With Speech-in-Noise Performance: The Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ancillary Study

A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities

Objective and Subjective Hearing Difficulties Are Associated With Lower Inhibitory Control

Cognitive Hearing Science: Three Memory Systems, Two Approaches, and the Ease of Language Understanding Model