Joint effects of air PM2.5 and socioeconomic dimensions on posted emotions of urban green space visitors in cities experiencing population urbanization: A pilot study on 50 cities of East China

Qian He,Yue Wang,Quan Qiu,Yan Su,Yang Wang,Hongxu Wei,Jiyue Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160607
2023-02-01
Abstract:People may perceive and expose negative sentiments in days with PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollutions, but evidence is still insufficient about the joint effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and socioeconomic factors on human sentiments. In this study, a total of 8032 facial photos of urban green space visitors were obtained from Sina Weibo in 50 cities of East China and rated for happy, sad, neutral scores and net positive emotion index (NPE; happy minus sad). Seasonal air PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were collected from days when people exposed faces in cities that were categorized to medium, large, outsize, and mega sizes according to resident populations (RPs). In summer, people posted lower sad score (11.28 %) than in winter (13.51 %; P = 0.0357) and higher NPE (35.86 %) than in autumn (30.92 %; P = 0.0009). Multivariate linear regression on natural logarithms revealed that factors of gross domestic product per capita (parameter estimate: 0.45), RP (0.59), non-production electricity consumption (0.34), and length of road transport (0.34) together generated positive contributions to posted happy score, while the total retail trade of consumer goods (-1.25) and PM<sub>2.5</sub> (-0.50) were perceived as joint depressors on NPE. Overall, cities with more rich households and activated retail sales attracted more people who exposed smiles in weathers with PM<sub>2.5</sub> compared to cities where local economy is reliable on heavy industry. The summertime in mega cities will be recommended to enjoy a higher frequency to perceive satisfaction due to exposure to low PM<sub>2.5</sub>.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?