Abstract:Research has found that vaccine-promoting messages can elicit state reactance (i.e., negative emotions in response to a perceived threat to behavioral freedom), especially among individuals with high trait reactance (i.e., proneness to experiencing reactance). This can result in a lower willingness to accept vaccines. We investigated whether inoculation against reactance – that is, forewarning individuals about potentially experiencing reactance – can reduce the effects of trait reactance on vaccination willingness. Participants ( N = 710) recruited through Facebook were randomly allocated to be either inoculated or not. They were then shown a message promoting a fictitious vaccine, which included either a low, medium, or high threat to freedom. Contrary to research on other health topics, inoculation was ineffective at reducing state reactance toward the vaccination message. Inoculation also did not mitigate the effects of trait reactance on vaccination willingness, and was even counterproductive in some cases. High-reactant individuals were less willing to get vaccinated than low-reactant ones, especially at high freedom threat. Conversely, high freedom threat resulted in increased vaccination willingness among low-reactant individuals. Further research is needed to understand why inoculation against reactance produces different results with vaccination, and to develop communication strategies that mitigate reactance to vaccination campaigns without compromising the positive effects of vaccine recommendations for low-reactant individuals.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Whether psychological inoculation can reduce people's psychological reactance to vaccine - related promotional information, thereby increasing the vaccination intention of individuals with high psychological reactance traits and their acceptance of vaccine information**. Specifically, the main objectives of the study include the following aspects: 1. **Verify the influence of psychological reactance** The study hypothesizes that individuals with high trait reactance will show stronger state reactance when facing vaccine promotional information, and thus reduce their vaccination intention (H1). In addition, the study also hypothesizes that as the degree of threat to freedom in the information increases (low, medium, high), psychological reactance and its influence on vaccination intention will also increase (H2). 2. **Evaluate the effect of psychological inoculation** The study explores whether psychological inoculation can mitigate the negative impact of psychological reactance traits on vaccination intention (H3). Specifically, by warning individuals in advance that they may experience psychological reactance, can they better cope with the threat to freedom in vaccine promotional information, thereby reducing psychological reactance. 3. **Analyze the change in vaccination intention** The study further examines the change in vaccination intention of individuals with different psychological reactance traits after providing detailed information on the safety and effectiveness of vaccines (H4). The study hypothesizes that the change in vaccination intention of individuals with high psychological reactance traits after information intervention will be smaller than that of individuals with low psychological reactance traits. ### Problems Solved by the Paper - **Theoretical level**: This study attempts to apply the psychological inoculation theory to the field of vaccine promotion and explore its effectiveness in reducing psychological reactance. This not only expands the application scope of the psychological inoculation theory but also provides a new perspective for understanding the role of psychological reactance in health communication. - **Practical level**: The research results can help public health promoters design more effective vaccine promotion strategies, especially when facing target groups that are prone to psychological reactance, how to optimize the information delivery method to increase the vaccination rate. ### Results and Findings Although the research design is reasonable and innovative, the experimental results show that: 1. Psychological inoculation fails to effectively reduce the psychological reactance caused by vaccine promotional information. 2. In some cases, psychological inoculation may even be counterproductive, leading some individuals to have a more negative attitude towards vaccination. 3. Information with a high threat to freedom has a promoting effect on the vaccination intention of individuals with low psychological reactance traits, but may have an inhibitory effect on individuals with high psychological reactance traits. These findings suggest that in the future, further research is needed on the applicable conditions and potential mechanisms of psychological inoculation in vaccine promotion, and at the same time, develop communication strategies more suitable for different types of audiences. ### Summary This paper attempts to solve how to reduce psychological reactance in vaccine promotion through psychological inoculation, thereby increasing people's vaccination intention. However, the research results show that the effect of psychological inoculation in this field is limited and may even have negative effects, which poses new directions and challenges for follow - up research.

Testing Psychological Inoculation to Reduce Reactance to Vaccine-Related Communication

Pathways to informed choices: The impact of freedom of choice and two-sided messages on psychological reactance and vaccination intentions among individuals who express concerns

Inoculation hesitancy: an exploration of challenges in scaling inoculation theory

Testing the Efficacy of Attitudinal Inoculation Videos to Enhance COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Quasi-Experimental Intervention Trial

Moral obligation, autonomous motivation and vaccine hesitancy: Highlighting moral obligation increases reactance in hesitant individuals

Recent advances in the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of endomyocardial fibrosis in Africa

Inoculation works and health advocacy backfires: Building resistance to COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in a low political trust context

How Misinformation and Rebuttals in Online Comments Affect People’s Intention to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines: The Roles of Psychological Reactance and Misperceptions

Who Gets Vaccinated? Cognitive and Non‐Cognitive Predictors of Individual Behaviour in Pandemics

The Resilience of Attitude Toward Vaccination: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial on the Processing of Misinformation

Promoting COVID-19 booster vaccines in Macao: A psychological reactance perspective

Vaccination Intention Following Receipt of Vaccine Information Through Interactive Simulation vs Text Among COVID-19 Vaccine-Hesitant Adults During the Omicron Wave in Germany

Assessing inoculation's effectiveness in motivating resistance to conspiracy propaganda in Finnish and United States samples

Oxidants as stimulators of signal transduction.

Psychological Reactance Theory and COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates: The Roles of Threat Magnitude and Direction of Threat

Psychological profiles of anti-vaccination argument endorsement

Prostaglandin D2 improves IL-31-induced alloknesis: itch-stimulation becomes pain-stimulation in mouse skin

Going with the Grain of Cognition: Applying Insights from Psychology to Build Support for Childhood Vaccination

Revisiting psychological reactance theory: relationship between psychological reactance and health-related attitudes/behaviors in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Rain on the Parade of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy

Flu vaccine hesitancy of French nurses and nurse aides: A fresh light on freedom-restoring strategies of reactance to pro-vaccine communication