Abstract:Microbiome studies are becoming larger in size to detect the potentially small effect that environmental factors have on our gut microbiomes, or that the microbiome has on our health. Therefore, fast and reproducible DNA isolation methods are needed to handle thousands of fecal samples. We used the Chemagic 360 chemistry and Magnetic Separation Module I (MSMI) instrument to compare two sample preservatives and four different pre-treatment protocols to find an optimal method for DNA isolation from thousands of fecal samples. The pre-treatments included bead beating, sample handling in tube and plate format, and proteinase K incubation. The optimal method offers a sufficient yield of high-quality DNA without contamination. Three human fecal samples (adult, senior, and infant) with technical replicates were extracted. The extraction included negative controls (OMNIgeneGUT, DNA/RNA shield fluid, and Chemagic Lysis Buffer 1) to detect cross-contamination and ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard as a positive control to mimic the human gut microbiome and assess sensitivity of the extraction method. All samples were extracted using Chemagic DNA Stool 200 H96 kit (PerkinElmer, Finland). The samples were collected in two preservatives, OMNIgeneGUT and DNA/RNA shield fluid. DNA quantity was measured using Qubit-fluorometer, DNA purity and quality using gel electrophoresis, and taxonomic signatures with 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing with V3V4 and V4 regions. Bead beating increased bacterial diversity. The largest increase was detected in gram-positive genera Blautia, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus. Preservatives showed minor differences in bacterial abundances. The profiles between the V3V4 and V4 regions differed considerably with lower diversity samples. Negative controls showed signs from genera abundant in fecal samples. Technical replicates of the Gut Standard and stool samples showed low variation. The selected isolation protocol included recommended steps from manufacturer as well as bead beating. Bead beating was found to be necessary to detect hard-to-lyse bacteria. The protocol was reproducible in terms of DNA yield among different stool replicates and the ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard. The MSM1 instrument and pre-treatment in a 96-format offered the possibility of automation and handling of large sample collections. Both preservatives were feasible in terms of sample handling and had low variation in taxonomic signatures. The 16S rRNA target region had a high impact on the composition of the bacterial profile. Importance: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a widely used method for determining the composition of the gut microbiota. Due to the differences in the gut microbiota composition between individuals, microbiome studies have expanded into large population studies to maximize detection of small effects on microbe-host interactions. Thus, the demand for a rapid and reliable microbial profiling is continuously increasing, making the optimization of high-throughput 96-format DNA extraction integral for NGS-based downstream applications. However, experimental protocols are prone to bias and errors from sample collection and storage, to DNA extraction, primer selection and sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses. Methodological bias can contribute to differences in microbiome profiles, causing variability across studies and laboratories using different protocols. To improve consistency and confidence of the measurements, the standardization of microbiome analysis methods has been recognized in many fields.

Sample Processing for Metaproteomic Analysis of Human Gut Microbiota

Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis

Benchmarking low- and high-throughput protein cleanup and digestion methods for human fecal metaproteomics

An overview of fecal sample preparation for global metabolic profiling

High Throughput and Quantitative Measurement of Microbial Metabolome by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Using Automated Alkyl Chloroformate Derivatization.

Assessing fecal metaproteomics workflow and small protein recovery using DDA and DIA PASEF mass spectrometry

Sample Collection, DNA Extraction, and Library Construction Protocols of the Human Microbiome Studies in the International Human Phenome Project

Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Aqueous and Lyophilized Pooled Human Feces from Two Diet Cohorts Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Coupled with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes

[Microbial metaproteomics--From sample processing to data acquisition and analysis]

Metaproteomic Analysis of Biogas Plants: A Complete Workflow from Lab to Bioinformatics

A metabolomics pipeline for the mechanistic interrogation of the gut microbiome

Metaproteomic Analysis of Microbial Communities Affecting Fishery Products

Metabolomics of fecal samples: A practical consideration

ChipFilter: Microfluidic-Based Comprehensive Sample Preparation Methodology for Microbial Consortia

Studying the Temporal Dynamics of the Gut Microbiota Using Metabolic Stable Isotope Labeling and Metaproteomics

Gut Microbiota Profiling: Metabolomics Based Approach to Unravel Compounds Affecting Human Health

Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights

Untargeted and Semi-Targeted Metabolomics Approach for Profiling Small Intestinal and Fecal Metabolome Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Critical steps in an environmental metaproteomics workflow

High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies