[Modifications of the unitary activity of the somatosensory cortex induced by excitation of amyelinic vagal fibers in cats].

N. Mei,M. Aubert

Journal of Physiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Knowledge of and Compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines among Anesthesiologists: A Nationwide Survey in China

Hui Li,Xiangyang Yu,Rui Zhou,Ya Wang,Xuedi Zhang,Shengwen Song,Qinghua Chen,Baoli Cheng,Xiangming Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1877166

2021-01-01

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

Abstract:We aimed to describe anesthesiologists' knowledge of and compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines in the perioperative management of patients with sepsis in China. We designed a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey. We sent out online questionnaires during 2019 to evaluate whether anesthesiologists in China were familiar with and applied SSC guidelines in perioperative management. We also compared anesthesiologists' knowledge of and compliance with the guidelines among different levels of hospital. In this study, we obtained 971 responses from anesthesiology departments across China. The survey responses showed that 39.0% of anesthesiologists rated their knowledge of the SSC guidelines as being "very familiar" or at least "somewhat familiar." In total, 68.9% of respondents chose "Initial fluid resuscitation followed by frequent hemodynamic reassessment" as their therapy strategy for patients with septic shock; 62.0% of anesthesiologists chose lactate as a marker of initial resuscitation in clinical practice, and 39.1% thought bundle therapy needed to be started within 1 hour of sepsis diagnosis. A total of 37.1% and 27.1% of respondents chose hydroxyethyl starches and gelatins, respectively, as the preferred fluids for septic shock. As the first choice of vasopressors in patients with sepsis, 727 (74.9%) anesthesiologists chose the correct answer (norepinephrine). Anesthesiologists from tertiary hospitals (class A) had greater familiarity and compliance with the SSC guidelines than those from other hospitals (P < 0.001). In summary, anesthesiologists in China have some knowledge of the SSC guidelines and tend to practice in keeping with these guidelines. However, for some items, anesthesiologists are not up to date with the latest version of the SSC guidelines. The popularity of these guidelines is not homogenous among different levels of hospital. Anesthesiologists must strengthen their knowledge of the SSC guidelines and update their practice in a regular and timely manner, especially in other tertiary and primary hospitals.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

Andrew Rhodes,Laura E. Evans,Waleed Alhazzani,Mitchell M. Levy,Massimo Antonelli,Ricard Ferrer,Anand Kumar,Jonathan E. Sevransky,Charles L. Sprung,Mark E. Nunnally,Bram Rochwerg,Gordon D. Rubenfeld,Derek C. Angus,Djillali Annane,Richard J. Beale,Geoffrey J. Bellinghan,Gordon R. Bernard,Jean-Daniel Chiche,Craig Coopersmith,Daniel P. De Backer,Craig J. French,Seitaro Fujishima,Herwig Gerlach,Jorge Luis Hidalgo,Steven M. Hollenberg,Alan E. Jones,Dilip R. Karnad,Ruth M. Kleinpell,Younsuk Koh,Thiago Costa Lisboa,Flavia R. Machado,John J. Marini,John C. Marshall,John E. Mazuski,Lauralyn A. McIntyre,Anthony S. McLean,Sangeeta Mehta,Rui P. Moreno,John Myburgh,Paolo Navalesi,Osamu Nishida,Tiffany M. Osborn,Anders Perner,Colleen M. Plunkett,Marco Ranieri,Christa A. Schorr,Maureen A. Seckel,Christopher W. Seymour,Lisa Shieh,Khalid A. Shukri,Steven Q. Simpson,Mervyn Singer,B. Taylor Thompson,Sean R. Townsend,Thomas Van der Poll,Jean-Louis Vincent,W. Joost Wiersinga,Janice L. Zimmerman,R. Phillip Dellinger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6

IF: 38.9

2017-01-18

Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract:ObjectiveTo provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012”.DesignA consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.MethodsThe panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.ResultsThe Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.ConclusionsSubstantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

critical care medicine
Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?

E. Carlos Sanchez,Michael R. Pinsky,Sharmili Sinha,Rajesh Chandra Mishra,Ahsina Jahan Lopa,Ranajit Chatterjee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2023-0022

2023-07-01

The Journal of Critical Care Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Septic shock is a common condition associated with hypotension and organ dysfunction. It is associated with high mortality rates of up to 60% despite the best recommended resuscitation strategies in international guidelines. Patients with septic shock generally have a Mean Arterial Pressure below 65 mmHg and hypotension is the most important determinant of mortality among this group of patients. The extent and duration of hypotension are important. The two initial options that we have are 1) administration of intravenous (IV) fluids and 2) vasopressors, The current recommendation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to administer 30 ml/kg fluid cannot be applied to all patients. Complications of fluid over-resuscitation further delay organ recovery, prolong ICU and hospital length of stay, and increase mortality. The only reason for administering intravenous fluids in a patient with circulatory shock is to increase the mean systemic filling pressure in a patient who is volume-responsive, such that cardiac output also increases. The use of vasopressors seems to be a more appropriate strategy, the very early administration of vasopressors, preferably during the first hour after diagnosis of septic shock, may have a multimodal action and potential advantages, leading to lower morbidity and mortality in the management of septic patients. Vasopressor therapy should be initiated as soon as possible in patients with septic shock.
Understanding How Clinicians Personalize Fluid and Vasopressor Decisions in Early Sepsis Management

Elizabeth S Munroe,Julien Weinstein,Hayley B Gershengorn,Kevin J Karlic,Sarah Seelye,Michael W Sjoding,Thomas S Valley,Hallie C Prescott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7480

2024-04-01

Abstract:Importance: Recent sepsis trials suggest that fluid-liberal vs fluid-restrictive resuscitation has similar outcomes. These trials used generalized approaches to resuscitation, and little is known about how clinicians personalize fluid and vasopressor administration in practice. Objective: To understand how clinicians personalize decisions about resuscitation in practice. Design, setting, and participants: This survey study of US clinicians in the Society of Critical Care Medicine membership roster was conducted from November 2022 to January 2023. Surveys contained 10 vignettes of patients with sepsis where pertinent clinical factors (eg, fluid received and volume status) were randomized. Respondents selected the next steps in management. Data analysis was conducted from February to September 2023. Exposure: Online Qualtrics clinical vignette survey. Main outcomes and measures: Using multivariable logistic regression, the associations of clinical factors with decisions about fluid administration, vasopressor initiation, and vasopressor route were tested. Results are presented as adjusted proportions with 95% CIs. Results: Among 11 203 invited clinicians, 550 (4.9%; 261 men [47.5%] and 192 women [34.9%]; 173 with >15 years of practice [31.5%]) completed at least 1 vignette and were included. A majority were physicians (337 respondents [61.3%]) and critical care trained (369 respondents [67.1%]). Fluid volume already received by a patient was associated with resuscitation decisions. After 1 L of fluid, an adjusted 82.5% (95% CI, 80.2%-84.8%) of respondents prescribed additional fluid and an adjusted 55.0% (95% CI, 51.9%-58.1%) initiated vasopressors. After 5 L of fluid, an adjusted 17.5% (95% CI, 15.1%-19.9%) of respondents prescribed more fluid while an adjusted 92.7% (95% CI, 91.1%-94.3%) initiated vasopressors. More respondents prescribed fluid when the patient examination found dry vs wet (ie, overloaded) volume status (adjusted proportion, 66.9% [95% CI, 62.5%-71.2%] vs adjusted proportion, 26.5% [95% CI, 22.3%-30.6%]). Medical history, respiratory status, lactate trend, and acute kidney injury had small associations with fluid and vasopressor decisions. In 1023 of 1127 vignettes (90.8%) where the patient did not have central access, respondents were willing to start vasopressors through a peripheral intravenous catheter. In cases where patients were already receiving peripheral norepinephrine, respondents were more likely to place a central line at higher norepinephrine doses of 0.5 µg/kg/min (adjusted proportion, 78.0%; 95% CI, 74.7%-81.2%) vs 0.08 µg/kg/min (adjusted proportion, 25.2%; 95% CI, 21.8%-28.5%) and after 24 hours (adjusted proportion, 59.5%; 95% CI, 56.6%-62.5%) vs 8 hours (adjusted proportion, 47.1%; 95% CI, 44.0%-50.1%). Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that fluid volume received is the predominant factor associated with ongoing fluid and vasopressor decisions, outweighing many other clinical factors. Peripheral vasopressor use is common. Future studies aimed at personalizing resuscitation must account for fluid volumes and should incorporate specific tools to help clinicians personalize resuscitation.
An observing system for the collection of fishery and oceanographic data

P. Falco,A. Belardinelli,A. Santojanni,N. Cingolani,A. Russo,E. Arneri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/OS-3-189-2007

2007-05-02

Abstract:Abstract. Fishery Observing System (FOS) was developed as a first and basic step towards fish stock abundance nowcasting/forecasting within the framework of the EU research program Mediterranean Forecasting System: Toward an Environmental Prediction (MFSTEP). The study of the relationship between abundance and environmental parameters also represents a crucial point towards forecasting. Eight fishing vessels were progressively equipped with FOS instrumentation to collect fishery and oceanographic data. The vessels belonged to different harbours of the Central and Northern Adriatic Sea. For this pilot application, anchovy ( Engraulis encrasicolus , L.) was chosen as the target species. Geo-referenced catch data, associated with in-situ temperature and depth, were the FOS products but other parameters were associated with catch data as well. MFSTEP numerical circulation models provide many of these data. In particular, salinity was extracted from re-analysis data of numerical circulation models. Satellite-derived sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll were also used as independent variables. Catch and effort data were used to estimate an abundance index (CPUE – Catch per Unit of Effort). Considering that catch records were gathered by different fishing vessels with different technical characteristics and operating on different fish densities, a standardized value of CPUE was calculated. A spatial and temporal average CPUE map was obtained together with a monthly mean time series in order to characterise the variability of anchovy abundance during the period of observation (October 2003–August 2005). In order to study the relationship between abundance and oceanographic parameters, Generalized Additive Models (GAM) were used. Preliminary results revealed a complex scenario: the southern sector of the domain is characterised by a stronger relationship than the central and northern sector where the interactions between the environment and the anchovy distribution are hidden by a higher percentage of variability within the system which is still unexplained. GAM analysis showed that increasing the number of explanatory variables also increased the portion of variance explained by the model. Data exchange and interdisciplinary efforts will therefore be crucial for the success of this research activity.
Selection and development of preclinical models in fracture-healing research.

P. O'loughlin,Simon Morr,L. Bogunovic,Abraham D Kim,Brian H Park,J. Lane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01585

2008-02-01

Abstract:Animal fracture models have been extensively applied to preclinical research as a platform to identify and characterize normal and abnormal physiological processes and to develop specific maneuvers that alter the biology and biomechanics being examined. The choice of animal model employed in a study bears a direct relationship to the specific intervention being analyzed. The animal models employed should be described clearly, control-group data should be established, and reproducibility should be defined from experiment to experiment and from institution to institution so that quantitative and qualitative outcomes can be reliably compared and contrasted to other related studies.
Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation

Jan Bakker,Eduardo Kattan,Djillali Annane,Ricardo Castro,Maurizio Cecconi,Daniel De Backer,Arnaldo Dubin,Laura Evans,Michelle Ng Gong,Olfa Hamzaoui,Can Ince,Bruno Levy,Xavier Monnet,Gustavo A. Ospina Tascón,Marlies Ostermann,Michael R. Pinsky,James A. Russell,Bernd Saugel,Thomas W. L. Scheeren,Jean-Louis Teboul,Antoine Vieillard Baron,Jean-Louis Vincent,Fernando G. Zampieri,Glenn Hernandez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06595-9

IF: 38.9

2021-12-15

Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract:Clinical and pathophysiological understanding of septic shock has progressed exponentially in the previous decades, translating into a steady decrease in septic shock-related morbidity and mortality. Even though large randomized, controlled trials have addressed fundamental aspects of septic shock resuscitation, many questions still exist. In this review, we will describe the current standards of septic shock resuscitation, but the emphasis will be placed on evolving concepts in different domains such as clinical resuscitation targets, adequate use of fluids and vasoactive drugs, refractory shock, and the use of extracorporeal therapies. Multiple research opportunities remain open, and collaborative endeavors should be performed to fill in these gaps.

critical care medicine
Assessment of adherence to the 2020 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for fluid resuscitation in children with suspected septic shock in paediatric emergency departments: a prospective multicentre study

Julian San Geroteo,Michael Levy,Marion Bailhache,Claire De Jorna,Elodie Privat,Oussama Gasmi,Maria Fuentes-Lopez,Yacine Laoudi,Mustapha Mazeghrane,Aline Malterre,Pauline Bories,Khaled Abdel Aal,Iozefina Arjoca,Jean Gaschignard,Davy Tanchaleune,Philippe Minodier,Fabien Audren,Tifanny Mazetier,Pauline Quagliaro,Florence Raimond,Soria Sieng,Blandine Robert,Delphine Wohrer,Nathalie De Suremain,Stéphane Dauger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325837

2024-03-18

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract:Background Paediatric sepsis is the leading cause of death in children under 5 years. No studies have evaluated the application of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2020 (SSC-2020) guidelines in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs). Objective To assess physician adherence to the SSC-2020 fluid resuscitation guidelines in children with suspected septic shock in PEDs. Methods This was a prospective multicentre observational study conducted in 21 French hospitals over 5 sequential weeks, between November 2021 and March 2022. Children with suspected septic shock and who received antimicrobial therapy within 72 hours were included. Primary outcome was SSC-2020 fluid resuscitation guidelines adherence (low 0–24%; moderate 25–74%; high 75–100%) according to: bolus volume of 10–20 mL/kg each, exclusive administration of balanced crystalloids at 1 and 24 hours of management, and initiation of fluid resuscitation within 1 hour of septic shock recognition. Results 63 children were included. 10 (16%) children had severe sepsis and 2 (3%) met the definition of septic shock. Compared with the SSC-2020 guidelines, 43 (68%) patients received boluses of 10–20 mL/kg; fluid resuscitation was initiated within 1 hour of septic shock recognition in 42 (76%) cases; balanced crystalloids were the only fluids administrated in 35 (56%) and 34 (55%) children at 1 and 24 hours of management, respectively. Main barriers reported by physicians were difficult intravenous access (43%), lack of team training (29%), workload constraints (28%), and absence or out-of-date protocols (24%). Conclusions This study found high adherence for fluid resuscitation initiation but moderate adherence for bolus volume and fluid choice. Trial registration number NCT05066464 .

pediatrics
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock

Craig M Coopersmith,Daniel De Backer,Clifford S Deutschman,Ricard Ferrer,Ishaq Lat,Flavia R Machado,Greg S Martin,Ignacio Martin-Loeches,Mark E Nunnally,Massimo Antonelli,Laura E Evans,Judith Hellman,Sameer Jog,Jozef Kesecioglu,Mitchell M Levy,Andrew Rhodes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003225

Abstract:Objective: To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome and underlying causes of sepsis and septic shock. Design: A consensus committee of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine was convened at the annual meetings of both societies. Subgroups had teleconference and electronic-based discussion. The entire committee iteratively developed the entire document and recommendations. Methods: Each committee member independently gave their top five priorities for sepsis research. A total of 88 suggestions (Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/CCM/D636) were grouped into categories by the committee co-chairs, leading to the formation of seven subgroups: infection, fluids and vasoactive agents, adjunctive therapy, administration/epidemiology, scoring/identification, post-intensive care unit, and basic/translational science. Each subgroup had teleconferences to go over each priority followed by formal voting within each subgroup. The entire committee also voted on top priorities across all subgroups except for basic/translational science. Results: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Of these, the top six clinical priorities were identified and include the following questions: 1) can targeted/personalized/precision medicine approaches determine which therapies will work for which patients at which times?; 2) what are ideal endpoints for volume resuscitation and how should volume resuscitation be titrated?; 3) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice?; 4) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock?; 5) what are the predictors of sepsis long-term morbidity and mortality?; and 6) what information identifies organ dysfunction? Conclusions: While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression of sepsis. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.
Hemodynamic Resuscitation Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis and Hypotension who are and are not Admitted to ICU; a Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Rebecca Vella,Philip Jones,Gerben Keijzers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2337

2024-05-23

Abstract:Introduction: There is an evidence-practice gap in the optimal timing and volume of intravenous fluid as well as vasopressor administration in managing patients with sepsis. This study aimed to explore current hemodynamic resuscitation practice in emergency department (ED) for patients with sepsis and hypotension. Methods: This is a sub-analysis of the prospective multicentre ARISE FLUIDS observational study, which was conducted in 70 EDs across Australia and New Zealand. Baseline characteristics, as well as ED management and outcome of sepsis patients were compared between patients who were and were not admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU). Results: A total of 587 patients with a median age of 65 years and even sex distribution (49% female) were available for analysis. Almost two-thirds of patients with sepsis (63.2%, n=371) were not admitted to ICU/HDU and were given lower intravenous (IV) fluid volumes over 24-hours, compared to those receiving critical care (4077ml vs. 5421ml, p<0.001). Patients not admitted to an ICU/HDU had a lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (median 14 vs. 18, P<0.001) and serum lactate level (1.8 vs. 2.8 mmol/L, P<0.001) compared to those admitted to ICU/HDU and 5.9% received a vasopressor infusion in the first 24-hours. Females, patients aged <65 years, and those with urosepsis or sepsis of non-respiratory origin received a greater volume of IV fluids. Conclusion: Almost two-thirds of patients were not admitted to ICU/HDU. In patients not admitted to ICU/HDU, 1 in 17 received a vasopressor infusion during their ED or early hospital stay. Patients not admitted to ICU/HDU received less fluid in the first 24 hours than those who were. Greater resuscitation fluid volumes were independently associated with female sex, age <65 years, higher lactate levels, and urinary or non-respiratory source of sepsis.
Early sepsis in Australia and New Zealand: A point‐prevalence study of haemodynamic resuscitation practices

Sandra L Peake,Anthony Delaney,Mark Finnis,Naomi Hammond,Serena Knowles,Stephen McDonald,Patricia J Williams,The George Institute for Global Health and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group the ARISE FLUIDS Investigators,the ARISE FLUIDS Investigators, The George Institute for Global Health and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14283

2023-07-19

EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

Abstract:Haemodynamic resuscitation of sepsis cohort Objective Optimal resuscitation of sepsis‐induced hypotension is uncertain, particularly the role of restrictive fluid strategies, leading to variability in usual practice. The objective of this study is to understand resuscitation practices in patients presenting to ED with early sepsis. Methods Design, participants and setting: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single‐day, point‐prevalence study enrolling adult patients present in 51 Australian and New Zealand ICUs at 10.00 hours, 8 June 2021. Main outcome measures: Site‐level data on sepsis policies and patient‐level demographic data, presence of sepsis and fluid and vasopressor administration in the first 24 h post‐ED presentation. Results A total of 722 patients were enrolled. ED was the ICU admission source for 222 of 722 patients (31.2%) and 78 of 222 patients (35%) met the criteria for sepsis within 24 h of ED presentation. Median age of the sepsis cohort was 61 (48–72) years, 58% were male and respiratory infection was the commonest cause (53.8%). The sepsis cohort had a higher severity of illness than the non‐sepsis cohort (144/222 patients) and chronic immunocompromise was more common. Of 78 sepsis patients, 55 (71%) received ≥1 fluid boluses with 500 and 1000 mL boluses equally common (both 49%). In the first 24 h, 2335 (1409–3125) mL (25.3 [13.2–42.9] mL/kg) was administered. Vasopressors were administered in 53 of 78 patients (68%) and for 25 patients (47%) administration was peripheral. Conclusions ICU patients presenting to the ED with sepsis receive less fluids than current international recommendations and peripheral vasopressor administration is common. This finding supports the conduct of clinical trials evaluating optimal fluid dose and vasopressor timing for early sepsis‐induced hypotension.
When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring

Glenn Hernandez,Cecilia Luengo,Alejandro Bruhn,Eduardo Kattan,Gilberto Friedman,Gustavo A Ospina-Tascon,Andrea Fuentealba,Ricardo Castro,Tomas Regueira,Carlos Romero,Can Ince,Jan Bakker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0030-z

IF: 10.318

2014-10-11

Annals of Intensive Care

Abstract:BackgroundThe decision of when to stop septic shock resuscitation is a critical but yet a relatively unexplored aspect of care. This is especially relevant since the risks of over-resuscitation with fluid overload or inotropes have been highlighted in recent years. A recent guideline has proposed normalization of central venous oxygen saturation and/or lactate as therapeutic end-points, assuming that these variables are equivalent or interchangeable. However, since the physiological determinants of both are totally different, it is legitimate to challenge the rationale of this proposal. We designed this study to gain more insights into the most appropriate resuscitation goal from a dynamic point of view. Our objective was to compare the normalization rates of these and other potential perfusion-related targets in a cohort of septic shock survivors.MethodsWe designed a prospective, observational clinical study. One hundred and four septic shock patients with hyperlactatemia were included and followed until hospital discharge. The 84 hospital-survivors were kept for final analysis. A multimodal perfusion assessment was performed at baseline, 2, 6, and 24 h of ICU treatment.ResultsSome variables such as central venous oxygen saturation, central venous-arterial pCO2 gradient, and capillary refill time were already normal in more than 70% of survivors at 6 h. Lactate presented a much slower normalization rate decreasing significantly at 6 h compared to that of baseline (4.0 [3.0 to 4.9] vs. 2.7 [2.2 to 3.9] mmol/L; p < 0.01) but with only 52% of patients achieving normality at 24 h. Sublingual microcirculatory variables exhibited the slowest recovery rate with persistent derangements still present in almost 80% of patients at 24 h.ConclusionsPerfusion-related variables exhibit very different normalization rates in septic shock survivors, most of them exhibiting a biphasic response with an initial rapid improvement, followed by a much slower trend thereafter. This fact should be taken into account to determine the most appropriate criteria to stop resuscitation opportunely and avoid the risk of over-resuscitation.

critical care medicine
A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock

Daniel De Backer,Maurizio Cecconi,Michelle S Chew,Ludhmila Hajjar,Xavier Monnet,Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón,Marlies Ostermann,Michael R Pinsky,Jean-Louis Vincent

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04255-y

2022-12-01

Abstract:Although guidelines provide excellent expert guidance for managing patients with septic shock, they leave room for personalization according to patients' condition. Hemodynamic monitoring depends on the evolution phase: salvage, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation. Initially during the salvage phase, monitoring to identify shock etiology and severity should include arterial pressure and lactate measurements together with clinical examination, particularly skin mottling and capillary refill time. Low diastolic blood pressure may trigger vasopressor initiation. At this stage, echocardiography may be useful to identify significant cardiac dysfunction. During the optimization phase, echocardiographic monitoring should be pursued and completed by the assessment of tissue perfusion through central or mixed-venous oxygen saturation, lactate, and carbon dioxide veno-arterial gradient. Transpulmonary thermodilution and the pulmonary artery catheter should be considered in the most severe patients. Fluid therapy also depends on shock phases. While administered liberally during the resuscitation phase, fluid responsiveness should be assessed during the optimization phase. During stabilization, fluid infusion should be minimized. In the de-escalation phase, safe fluid withdrawal could be achieved by ensuring tissue perfusion is preserved. Norepinephrine is recommended as first-line vasopressor therapy, while vasopressin may be preferred in some patients. Essential questions remain regarding optimal vasopressor selection, combination therapy, and the most effective and safest escalation. Serum renin and the angiotensin I/II ratio may identify patients who benefit most from angiotensin II. The optimal therapeutic strategy for shock requiring high-dose vasopressors is scant. In all cases, vasopressor therapy should be individualized, based on clinical evaluation and blood flow measurements to avoid excessive vasoconstriction. Inotropes should be considered in patients with decreased cardiac contractility associated with impaired tissue perfusion. Based on pharmacologic properties, we suggest as the first test a limited dose of dobutamine, to add enoximone or milrinone in the second line and substitute or add levosimendan if inefficient. Regarding adjunctive therapies, while hydrocortisone is nowadays advised in patients receiving high doses of vasopressors, patients responding to corticosteroids may be identified in the future by the analysis of selected cytokines or specific transcriptomic endotypes. To conclude, although some general rules apply for shock management, a personalized approach should be considered for hemodynamic monitoring and support.
Suppressor Mutations for Presenilin 1 Familial Alzheimer Disease Mutants Modulate γ-Secretase Activities*

E. Futai,S. Osawa,Tetsuo Cai,T. Fujisawa,S. Ishiura,T. Tomita

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.629287

IF: 5.485

2015-11-11

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract:γ-Secretase is a multisubunit membrane protein complex containing presenilin (PS1) as a catalytic subunit. Familial Alzheimer disease (FAD) mutations within PS1 were analyzed in yeast cells artificially expressing membrane-bound substrate, amyloid precursor protein, or Notch fused to Gal4 transcriptional activator. The FAD mutations, L166P and G384A (Leu-166 to Pro and Gly-384 to Ala substitution, respectively), were loss-of-function in yeast. We identified five amino acid substitutions that suppress the FAD mutations. The cleavage of amyloid precursor protein or Notch was recovered by the secondary mutations. We also found that secondary mutations alone activated the γ-secretase activity. FAD mutants with suppressor mutations, L432M or S438P within TMD9 together with a missense mutation in the second or sixth loops, regained γ-secretase activity when introduced into presenilin null mouse fibroblasts. Notably, the cells with suppressor mutants produced a decreased amount of Aβ42, which is responsible for Alzheimer disease. These results indicate that the yeast system is useful to screen for mutations and chemicals that modulate γ-secretase activity.
[Magnetic resonance tomography].

G. Friedmann,W. Steinbrich

Abstract:
Assessment of outcomes in patients with heart failure and end-stage kidney disease following fluid resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock

John Michael Herndon,Sarah B. Blackwell,Nathan Pinner,Thomas S. Achey,Hillary B. Holder,Cruz Tidwell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.02.001

IF: 1.473

2024-02-18

Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Background Sepsis fluid resuscitation is controversial, especially for patients with volume overload risk. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends a 30 mL/kg crystalloid fluid bolus for patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion. Criticism of this approach includes excessive fluid resuscitation in certain patients. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of guideline-concordant fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis and heart failure (HF) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with sepsis who qualified for guideline-directed fluid resuscitation and concomitant HF or ESKD. Those receiving crystalloid fluid boluses of at least 30 mL/kg within 3 hours of sepsis diagnosis were placed in the concordant group and all others in the non-concordant group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS); vasoactive medications and net volume over 24 hours; new mechanical ventilation, new or increased volume removal, and acute kidney injury within 48 hours; and shock-free survival at 7 days. Results One hundred twenty-five patients were included in each group. In-hospital mortality was 34.4% in the concordant group and 44.8% in the non-concordant group (p-value=0.1205). The concordant group had a shorter ICU LOS (7.6 versus 10.5 days, p-value=0.0214) and hospital LOS (12.9 versus 18.3 days, p-value=0.0163) but increased new mechanical ventilation (37.6 versus 20.8%, p-value=0.0052). No differences in other outcomes were observed. Conclusion Receipt of a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus did not affect outcomes in a cohort of patients with mixed types of HF and sepsis-induced hypoperfusion.

emergency medicine
American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock

Alan L Davis,Joseph A Carcillo,Rajesh K Aneja,Andreas J Deymann,John C Lin,Trung C Nguyen,Regina S Okhuysen-Cawley,Monica S Relvas,Ranna A Rozenfeld,Peter W Skippen,Bonnie J Stojadinovic,Eric A Williams,Tim S Yeh,Fran Balamuth,Joe Brierley,Allan R de Caen,Ira M Cheifetz,Karen Choong,Edward Conway Jr,Timothy Cornell,Allan Doctor,Marc-Andre Dugas,Jonathan D Feldman,Julie C Fitzgerald,Heidi R Flori,James D Fortenberry,Ana Lia Graciano,Bruce M Greenwald,Mark W Hall,Yong Yun Han,Lynn J Hernan,Jose E Irazuzta,Elizabeth Iselin,Elise W van der Jagt,Howard E Jeffries,Saraswati Kache,Chhavi Katyal,Niranjan Kissoon,Alexander A Kon,Martha C Kutko,Graeme MacLaren,Timothy Maul,Renuka Mehta,Fola Odetola,Kristine Parbuoni,Raina Paul,Mark J Peters,Suchitra Ranjit,Karin E Reuter-Rice,Eduardo J Schnitzler,Halden F Scott,Adalberto Torres Jr,Jacki Weingarten-Arams,Scott L Weiss,Jerry J Zimmerman,Aaron L Zuckerberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002425

Abstract:Objectives: The American College of Critical Care Medicine provided 2002 and 2007 guidelines for hemodynamic support of newborn and pediatric septic shock. Provide the 2014 update of the 2007 American College of Critical Care Medicine "Clinical Guidelines for Hemodynamic Support of Neonates and Children with Septic Shock." Design: Society of Critical Care Medicine members were identified from general solicitation at Society of Critical Care Medicine Educational and Scientific Symposia (2006-2014). The PubMed/Medline/Embase literature (2006-14) was searched by the Society of Critical Care Medicine librarian using the keywords: sepsis, septicemia, septic shock, endotoxemia, persistent pulmonary hypertension, nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines in the newborn and pediatric age groups. Measurements and main results: The 2002 and 2007 guidelines were widely disseminated, translated into Spanish and Portuguese, and incorporated into Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Heart Association/Pediatric Advanced Life Support sanctioned recommendations. The review of new literature highlights two tertiary pediatric centers that implemented quality improvement initiatives to improve early septic shock recognition and first-hour compliance to these guidelines. Improved compliance reduced hospital mortality from 4% to 2%. Analysis of Global Sepsis Initiative data in resource rich developed and developing nations further showed improved hospital mortality with compliance to first-hour and stabilization guideline recommendations. Conclusions: The major new recommendation in the 2014 update is consideration of institution-specific use of 1) a "recognition bundle" containing a trigger tool for rapid identification of patients with septic shock, 2) a "resuscitation and stabilization bundle" to help adherence to best practice principles, and 3) a "performance bundle" to identify and overcome perceived barriers to the pursuit of best practice principles.
Study on Temperature Model And Self-Adaption for Finishing Stands of Hot Strip Mill

Shui-xuan Chen,J. Zou,Xin Fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WCICA.2006.1714358

2006-06-21

Abstract:The temperature setting system for the finishing stands of hot strip mill was analyzed for technical improvement. Based on production data, a method was proposed to correct the radiation factor of air cooling model and a new exponential model was substituted for original water cooling model. Then an enhanced short and long self-adaption temperature model of the finishing stands was put forward to match the requirement of hot strip production, with both simulation and experimental results confirming that the setup accuracy of finishing temperature is effectively improved and the error deviation was greatly decreased when steel grade and dimension were changed
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing conservative versus liberal intravenous fluid administration in patients with sepsis or septic shock at risk of fluid overload

Aadil Bharwani,María Lucía Pérez,Marina Englesakis,Tine Sylvest Meyhoff,Anders Perner,Praleene Sivapalan,Mary Elizabeth Wilcox

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069601

IF: 3.006

2023-05-25

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Intravenous crystalloid fluid resuscitation forms a crucial part of the early intervention bundle for sepsis and septic shock, with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommending a 30 mL/kg fluid bolus within the first hour. Compliance with this suggested target varies in patients with comorbidities such as congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease and cirrhosis due to concerns regarding iatrogenic fluid overload. However, it remains unclear whether resuscitation with higher fluid volumes puts them at greater risk of adverse outcomes. Thus, this systematic review will synthesise evidence from existing studies to assess the effects of a conservative as compared with a liberal approach to fluid resuscitation in patients at greater perceived risk of fluid overload due to comorbid conditions. Methods and analysis This protocol was registered on PROSPERO and has been drafted following the checklist of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will search MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, Embase Classic, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Complete and ClinicalTrials.gov. A preliminary search of these databases was performed from their inception to 30 August 2022. The risk of bias and random errors will be assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case–control and cohort studies. If a sufficient number of comparable studies are identified, we will perform a meta-analysis applying random effects model. We will investigate heterogeneity using a combination of visual inspection of the funnel plot as well as the Egger's test. Ethics and dissemination No ethics approval is required for this study since no original data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022348181.

medicine, general & internal

[Modifications of the unitary activity of the somatosensory cortex induced by excitation of amyelinic vagal fibers in cats].

Knowledge of and Compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines among Anesthesiologists: A Nationwide Survey in China

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?

Understanding How Clinicians Personalize Fluid and Vasopressor Decisions in Early Sepsis Management

An observing system for the collection of fishery and oceanographic data

Selection and development of preclinical models in fracture-healing research.

Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation

Assessment of adherence to the 2020 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for fluid resuscitation in children with suspected septic shock in paediatric emergency departments: a prospective multicentre study

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock

Hemodynamic Resuscitation Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis and Hypotension who are and are not Admitted to ICU; a Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Early sepsis in Australia and New Zealand: A point‐prevalence study of haemodynamic resuscitation practices

When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring

A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock

Suppressor Mutations for Presenilin 1 Familial Alzheimer Disease Mutants Modulate γ-Secretase Activities*

[Magnetic resonance tomography].

Assessment of outcomes in patients with heart failure and end-stage kidney disease following fluid resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock

American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock

Study on Temperature Model And Self-Adaption for Finishing Stands of Hot Strip Mill

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing conservative versus liberal intravenous fluid administration in patients with sepsis or septic shock at risk of fluid overload