Diagnostic accuracy of different types of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial aneurysm: a Meta-analysis
Daoying Wang,Haiyang Li,Haijun Wang,Xinghui Li,Jinhui Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2019.06.010
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To perform a Meta-analysis to systematically review the accuracy different types of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for intracranial aneurysm (IAN).Methods PubMed,EMbase,Cochralle library,Cnki,China biomedical literature database,weipu,wanfang and other databases were searched to collect Chinese and English literatures on IAN diagnosis by different types of CTA and MRA before January 2018.The references were evaluated and screened according to the criteria of diagnostic research.In addition,quality assessment was conducted according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2,RevMan 5.3 and Metadisc 1.4 software was used to respectively compare the summary sensitivity (SEN),summary specificity (SPE),diagnostic odds ratio (DOR),summary positive likelihood ratio (PLR),summary negative likelihood ratio (NLR),pre-test probability,post-test probability between CTA,MRA and subgroup.The forest figure and a summary of receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn out and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated.Deek's funnel plot was drawn by Stata 12.0 statistical analysis software to evaluate the publication bias of included literature.Heterogeneity was analyzed by Q test and I2.P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.Results A total of 1754 records was retrieved and 38 studies involving 5212 patients were included.The results of meta-analysis showed that:①The summary SEN,summary SPE,DOR,summary PLR,summary NLR,AUC,pre-test probability,post-test probability of CTA were:0.947 (95%CI:0.926,0.963),0.916 (95%CI:0.864,0.949),195.328 (95%CI:97.367,391.847),11.218 (95%CI:6.861,18.341),0.057 (95%CI:0.040,0.082),0.98 (95%CI:0.96,0.99),20% and 74%;② The summary SEN,summary SPE,DOR,summary PLR,summary NLR,AUC,pre-test probability,post-test probability of MRA were:0.935 (95%CI:0.899,0.958),0.956 (95%CI:0.917,0.977),311.421 (95%CI:126.935,764.038),21.285 (95%CI:11.114,40.766),0.068 (95%CI:0.044,0.107),0.98 (95%CI:0.97,0.99),20% and 84%;③ The results of subgroup analysis showed that:there were no statistical difference between the different types of CTA and MRA in SROC.Conclusions The different types of CTA and MRA can be used to diagnose IAN,and the diagnostic accuracy is relatively high and basically consistent.Both CTA and MRA can be used as the first choice for diagnosing IAN.