The Framing and Scope of Altered Mental Status and Delirium
Catherine S.W. Albin,Eyal Y. Kimchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790198
2024-11-17
Seminars in Neurology
Abstract:Of the many clinical symptoms that people may experience, alterations of mental status strike most directly at our personal core. These distressing symptoms affect not only the individuals directly experiencing them, but also those who care for them, both personally and professionally. The importance of altered mental status is yet further magnified by its prevalence, as one of the most common reasons to receive acute medical care. The term altered mental status , however, represents an especially complex constellation of symptoms, a label applied by clinicians that simultaneously consolidates and oversimplifies different patient concerns and clinical syndromes that can be due to disparate causes within and outside of the nervous system.[1] This complexity can provoke nearly as much confusion in clinicians as patients themselves. Achieving clarity on acute confusion is challenging given our incomplete understanding of the relevant biological pathways, and further hindered by divergent terminology and fragmented literatures.[2] For example, delirium is a disorder of attention and awareness with widely recognized definitions in both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)[3] and the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases.[4] But neurologists have not always used the word delirium in the same manner as specialists in other fields,[5] with some splitting presentations phenotypically into more hyperactive "delirium" and more hypoactive "encephalopathy."[6] Recent efforts have been made to clarify this terminology, for example in a statement endorsed by 10 societies including the American Academy of Neurology and Neurocritical Care Society.[7] This proposed framework unites DSM-defined delirium on a spectrum with some other presentations of altered mental status such as coma, to represent clinical expressions of underlying pathobiological processes, for which the term "encephalopathy" is reserved. It is not yet clear how widely adopted this proposed framework will be, but it admirably endeavors a unifying path forward. While our field continues to wrestle with the complexities and nuances of defining various states of altered mentation, the consequences of acutely altered mentation generally, and delirium specifically, are staggering. Altered mental status accounts for nearly 1 in 10 of all emergency department visits.[8] Once hospitalized, reductive labeling with "delirium" or "toxic-metabolic encephalopathy" may create a false sense of diagnostic closure and thus hinder the search for underlying, and potentially, treatable pathology. This is particularly true of medically complex patients. For example, in medical intensive care units, nearly one in three patients may be delirious when screened with the validated Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit.[9] However, approximately 1 in 10 of these complex patients will develop a primary neurologic injury occur during their admission (most frequently stroke, seizure, or hypoxic brain injury).[10] Extreme caution, careful examination, and diagnostic humility are needed to prevent all mental status change from being incorrectly reduced to delirium. Even when the diagnosis of delirium is correctly made, minimizing the diagnosis—"they're just delirious"—undervalues the prognostic significance of the condition. Not only do patients with delirium have an increased length of hospital stay, but also they are endangered by increased mortality and dramatically reduced functional recovery and cognitive performance months beyond the hospitalization.[11] Our goal in this issue of Seminars in Neurology is to share a resolutely interdisciplinary and pragmatic map to the constellation of related concepts of altered mental status, delirium, and encephalopathy. We first provide two complementary systematic approaches to patients with altered mental status, providing conceptual frameworks and practical bedside guidance for these patients: a neurologically informed approach to the recognition and diagnosis of acute changes in mental status, as covered by Lieberman and Berkowitz, and a psychiatrically informed approach by Hamm and Rosenthal. While all patients with altered mental status require careful examination, those at the most extreme end of the altered spectrum with disorders of consciousness represent both unique challenges and opportunities, as highlighted in article by Dhadwal et al. Similarly, those in the intensive care unit, with history of organ transplant, or with cancer also require a unique diagnostic approach—as discussed in articles by Albin et al, Weiss, Pflugrad, and Kandiah, and Rhee et al, respectively. We have been deliberate to include special considerations in the approach to pregnant patients, as presented by Kroopnick and Miller, and childre -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology