Characteristics of Falls Producing Hip Fracture in an Elderly Population
Francesc Formiga,A. Rivera,J. M. Nolla,Ramon M. Pujol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000075564
2004-02-18
Gerontology
Abstract:Accessible online at: www.karger.com/ger Dear Sir, The majority of hip fractures are produced because of a fall [1]. Hip fractures commonly result in permanent disability, admission to institutional care, or death [2, 3]. Recently, in an interesting study, Mbrourou et al. [4] reported that elderly fallers showed a much smaller first step length that observed in non-fallers. We prospectively examined the characteristics associated with falls causing hip fracture in elderly patients in order to elaborate guidelines for their prevention [5, 6]. We evaluated 130 consecutive patients (164 years) admitted because of a hip fracture. Patients with a bone fracture following an injury (n = 17), those with pathological fracture (n = 4), those who reported spontaneously broken bone (n = 2), and patients with a cognitive or communication impairment, in the absence of a caregiver (n = 7), were excluded. Patients were asked about the circumstances that led to their fall: location, time (we considered daytime 8–20 h), and height, and also about the presence of any structural barriers. We detailed all drug therapy. We also evaluated if diabetes, osteoarthritis or stroke were coexisting disorders. Functional status using the Barthel index (BI) [7], comorbidity using Charlson score (CS) [8], vision using Jaeger test, and hearing capacity with the Whisper test [9] were assessed. We included 100 patients (80 women, mean age 81.7 years). Previous to the hip fracture, the mean BI was 78 and CS was 1.7 B 0.2. 82% of patients lived at home and 18% were institutionalized (59% structural barriers). Fifty-nine patients had osteoarthritis, 22 patients had a previous stroke, and 12 patients diabetes. Twenty-one patients had vision impairment and 35 patients hearing impairment. The mean number of medications was 4.2 (58% antihypertensives, 24% anxiolytics, 16% sedative-hypnotic, and 14% antidepressives). The mean value of falls during the last year was 2.3 (range 0–12); 23% had more than 2 falls in the previous year. Usually falls were at home (72%) and during the daytime (77%). The fall came from a vertical position in 85% of the cases; in 5% from a higher height, and in 10% from a lower height. In 64% of the patients an intrinsic risk factor was considered the most likely cause, in 20% an extrinsic risk factor and in 16% a combination. Similar to previous reports [5, 10], we found that most of the falls causing hip fracture in elderly patients occurred at home and during the daylight hours. Although a high percentage of structural barriers were found, we only reported one certainly extrinsic factor in the 36% of falls. Additionally, we found a possible intrinsic factor in the 80% of the falls. These findings and the difficulty to modify extrinsic factors, especially the external environment, support the view that it would be prudent to prevent falls focusing on intrinsic risk factors in which the evidence of a causal association is strong [11]. Previous to the fall that caused hip fracture, we found that 23% of the patients had fallen repeatedly. Efforts to identify elderly people at risk of fall should be stressed in order to establish preventive measures.