Abstract:Measuring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels is widely used for screening for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.1 However, the value of PSA testing for reducing prostate cancer-specific or all-cause mortality in asymptomatic men is uncertain.2 The Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia and the Cancer Council of Australia recommend that men aged 50–69 years be offered biennial PSA testing if they make an informed decision to be tested.1 We investigated age-specific patterns of PSA testing and PSA levels in men aged 40 years or more without symptoms of prostate cancer. We analysed routinely collected data from 180 Victorian general practices, pooled by the data custodian, Outcome Health.3 We included all men who had attended the same practice at least three times during October 2016 – September 2018. We identified tested men and testing frequency from recorded PSA test results. PSA testing prevalence was defined as the number of men tested at least once divided by the total number of men in an age group. We evaluated the relationship between log-transformed PSA levels and age as a continuous variable in a linear regression model. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners National Research and Evaluation Ethics Committee (17-008) and the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (5201700872) approved our study. A total of 142 016 male patients were identified. The proportion who underwent PSA testing at least once (prevalence) or at least twice during the study period increased with age: prevalence peaked with the 65–69 year age group (8132 men tested, 54% of age group), and the proportion of men tested at least twice with the 70–74 year age group (3159 men, 46% of age group) (Box 1). A total of 78 818 PSA test results were recorded during the study period; about one-third were for men aged 60–69 years (25 496 tests, 32%). The median PSA level increased from 0.7 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5–0.9 ng/mL; 95th percentile, 1.7 ng/mL) for men aged 40–44 years to 1.9 ng/mL (IQR, 0.8–4.5 ng/mL; 95th percentile, 11.7 ng/mL) for men aged 85 years or more (Box 2). The median PSA level increased by 3.2% per year of age (95% confidence interval, 3.1–3.3%). * Proportion of male patients in age group who were tested. It is recommended that men aged 50–69 years be tested once every two years. Numbers of patients in each age group are provided in the online Supporting Information. Age group (years) Number of tests PSA level (ng/mL) Median (IQR) 95th percentile 40–44 2685 (3.4%) 0.7 (0.5–0.9) 1.7 45–49 5894 (7.5%) 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 2.1 50–54 9544 (12.1%) 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 2.6 55–59 12 359 (15.7%) 0.9 (0.6–1.5) 3.7 60–64 12 944 (16.4%) 1.1 (0.6–2.0) 4.7 65–69 12 551 (15.9%) 1.3 (0.7–2.4) 5.5 70–74 10 999 (14.0%) 1.5 (0.8–2.8) 6.4 75–79 6440 (8.2%) 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 8.0 80–84 3327 (4.2%) 1.8 (0.8–3.6) 9.2 ≥ 85 2075 (2.6%) 1.9 (0.8–4.5) 11.7 All ages groups 78 818 1.0 (0.6–2.0) 5.4 We found that PSA testing prevalence, the proportion of men tested more than once within 24 months, and median PSA levels each increased with age. For men over 69 years of age, this could lead to further invasive tests and treatments, some of which may be unnecessary or cause harm. The high PSA testing prevalence among older men was similar to previous Australian reports (48% of men aged 70 years or more reported they had PSA tests in the preceding two years4), and the PSA levels matched current age-specific 95th percentile reference ranges.5 Why patterns of testing are different to those recommended (ie, more frequently than biennial and beyond 69 years of age) cannot be explained by general practice data, but reasons may include patient expectations, fragmentation of care, and the persistence of old guideline recommendations. We have reported the most comprehensive snapshot of PSA testing in Australia based on electronic general practice data since the release of the current guidelines for PSA testing of asymptomatic men. Our study also showed that such data can be used to establish benchmarks for designing quality improvement activities and to promote evidence-based decision-making in general practice. This study, a collaboration by Macquarie University, Outcome Health, the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs, and three Victorian Primary Health Networks (Eastern Melbourne, South Eastern Melbourne, Gippsland), was funded by the Australian Department of Health Quality Use of Pathology Program (grant 4-2QFVW4M). We thank the practices that contributed data for their commitment to quality improvement. No relevant disclosures. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Preferences for More or Less Health Care and Association With Health Literacy of Men Eligible for Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in Australia

Perceptions and Misconceptions of PSA Screening in Switzerland: A Preference Epidemiology Study

Perspectives and Misconceptions of an Online Adult Male Cohort Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening

Limited Evidence of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Audio-Recorded Primary Care Visits Among Black Men and their Healthcare Providers

Patient Preferences for Investigating Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Impact of the diagnostic label for a low-risk prostate lesion: protocol for two online factorial randomised experiments

Physician Communication Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening: Analysis of Unannounced Standardized Patient Visits.

The prostate cancer screening debate: public reaction to medical controversy in the media

Prostate-specific Antigen Testing of Asymptomatic Men in Australia: an Observational Study Based on Electronic General Practice Data.

The relationship between men's health literacy levels and their health beliefs and attitudes towards prostate cancer screening: A case study in a rural area

Benefits and harms of prostate specific antigen testing according to Australian guidelines

Determinants of male reproductive health disorders: the Men in Australia Telephone Survey (MATeS)

Patients' Attitudes Regarding Lung Cancer Screening and Decision Aids. A Survey and Focus Group Study

Multidimensional Healthcare Access Barriers to Prostate‐Specific Antigen Testing: A Nation‐Wide Panel Study in the United States From 2006 to 2020

64 A Snapshot of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing in General Practices Across Three Primary Health Networks in Victoria

Access to PSA Testing and Mortality Among Men With Prostate Cancer

What can patient-reported experience measures tell us about the variation in patients' experience of prostate cancer care? A cross-sectional study using survey data from the National Prostate Cancer Audit in England

Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions

Lifestyle factors and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in UK Biobank: Implications for epidemiological research

Prostate Cancer Patients’ Understanding of the Gleason Scoring System: Implications for Shared Decision-Making

Perception of preventive health needs in a prostate-cancer screening population: a preliminary report