[History of nephrology in the past 100 years: Water-electrolyte imbalance].

F. Marumo,M. Kuwahara

2002-05-10

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Transversus thoracis muscle plane block in cardiac surgery: a pilot feasibility study

Satoru Fujii,Matthew Roche,Philip M Jones,Deepti Vissa,Daniel Bainbridge,Jian Ray Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-100178

2019-03-21

Abstract:Introduction Cardiac surgery patients often experience significant pain after median sternotomy. The transversus thoracis muscle plane (TTP) block is a newly developed, single-shot nerve block technique that provides analgesia for the anterior chest wall. In this double-blind pilot study, we assessed the feasibility of performing this novel block as an analgesic adjunct. Methods All patients aged 18–90 undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomized to the block or standard care control group on admission to the intensive care unit after surgery. Under ultrasound guidance, patients in the block group received the TTP block with 20 mL of either 0.3% or 0.5% ropivacaine bilaterally, based on weight. The control group did not receive any injections. All blocks were performed by a single anesthesiologist, and data collection was performed by blinded assessors. The primary feasibility outcomes were rate of recruitment, adherence, and adverse events. The rate of recruitment was defined as the ratio of patients giving informed consent to the number of eligible patients who were approached to participate. Secondary outcomes included 12-hour and 24-hour Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, 24-hour hydromorphone and acetaminophen requirements, time to extubation, time to first opioid administration, and patient satisfaction (on a yes/no questionnaire) at 24 hours. Results Twenty patients were approached for this study and 19 were enrolled. Eight patients received the intended intervention in each group. The recruitment rate was 95% of all approached eligible patients, and the adherence rate to treatment group was 94%. There were no block-related adverse events. The mean (SD) NRS pain scores at rest were 3.3 (3.2) in the block group vs 5.6 (3.2) in the control group at 12 hours. At 24 hours, the pain scores were 4.1 (3.9) vs 4.1 (3.3) in the block and control group, respectively. The mean (SD) 24-hour hydromorphone administration was 1.9 (1.1) mg in the block group vs 1.8 (0.9) mg in the control group. Discussion The TTP block is a novel pain management strategy poststernotomy. The results reveal a high patient recruitment, adherence, and satisfaction rate, and provide some preliminary data supporting safety. Trial registration number NCT03128346 .

anesthesiology
Ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state‐of‐the‐art review

K. J. Chin,B. Versyck,A. Pawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15276

IF: 12.893

2021-01-01

Anaesthesia

Abstract:Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall are increasingly popular alternatives to established techniques such as thoracic epidural or paravertebral blockade, as they are simple to perform and have an appealing safety profile. Many different techniques have been described, which can be broadly categorised into anteromedial, anterolateral and posterior chest wall blocks. Understanding the relevant clinical anatomy is critical not only for block performance, but also to match block techniques appropriately with surgical procedures. The sensory innervation of tissues deep to the skin (e.g. muscles, ligaments and bone) can be overlooked, but is often a significant source of pain. The primary mechanism of action for these blocks is a conduction blockade of sensory afferents travelling in the targeted fascial planes, as well as of peripheral nociceptors in the surrounding tissues. A systemic action of absorbed local anaesthetic is plausible but unlikely to be a major contributor. The current evidence for their clinical applications indicates that certain chest wall techniques provide significant benefit in breast and thoracic surgery, similar to that provided by thoracic paravertebral blockade. Their role in trauma and cardiac surgery is evolving and holds great potential. Further avenues of research into these versatile techniques include: optimal local anaesthetic dosing strategies; high-quality randomised controlled trials focusing on patient-centred outcomes beyond acute pain; and comparative studies to determine which of the myriad blocks currently on offer should be core competencies in anaesthetic practice.

anesthesiology
An Expert Review of Chest Wall Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery

Jennifer Hargrave,Michael C Grant,Lavinia Kolarczyk,Marta Kelava,Tiffany Williams,Jessica Brodt,J Prince Neelankavil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.10.026

Abstract:The recent integration of regional anesthesia techniques into the cardiac surgical patient population has become a component of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery pathways. Fascial planes of the chest wall enable single-injection or catheter-based infusions to spread local anesthetic over multiple levels of innervation. Although median sternotomy remains a common approach to cardiac surgery, minimally invasive techniques have integrated additional methods of performing cardiac surgery. Understanding the surgical approach and chest wall innervation is crucial to success in choosing the appropriate chest wall block. Parasternal intercostal plane techniques (previously termed "pectointercostal fascial plane" and "transversus thoracic muscle plane") provide anterior chest and ipsilateral sternal coverage. Anterolateral chest wall coverage is feasible with the interpectoral plane and pectoserratus plane blocks (previously termed "pectoralis") and superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block provides extensive coverage of the ipsilateral chest wall. Any of these techniques has the potential to provide bilateral chest wall analgesia. The relative novelty of these techniques requires ongoing research to be strategic, thoughtful, and focused on clinically meaningful outcomes to enable widespread evidence-based implementation. This review article discusses the key perspectives for performing and assessing chest wall blocks in a cardiac surgical population.
Chest Wall and Abdominal Blocks for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgeries: A Review

Richa Sharma,James Damiano,Ibrahim Al-Saidi,Anis Dizdarevic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01158-7

Abstract:Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date description and overview of the rapidly growing literature pertaining to techniques and clinical applications of chest wall and abdominal fascial plane blocks in managing perioperative pain. Recent findings: Clinical evidence suggests that regional anesthesia blocks, including fascial plane blocks, such as pectoralis, serratus, erector spinae, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum blocks, are effective in providing analgesia for various surgical procedures and have more desirable side effect profile when compared to traditional neuraxial techniques. They offer advantages such as reduced opioid consumption, improved pain control, and decreased opioid-related side effects. Further research is needed to establish optimal techniques and indications for these blocks. Presently, they are a vital instrument in a gamut of multimodal analgesia options, especially when there are contraindications to neuraxial or para-neuraxial procedures. Ultimately, clinical judgment and provider skill set determine which blocks-alone or in combination-should be offered to any patient.
Avoiding the Internal Mammary Artery During Parasternal Blocks: Ultrasound Identification and Technique Considerations

Giuseppe Sepolvere,Andrea Tognù,Mario Tedesco,Francesco Coppolino,Loredana Cristiano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.007

Abstract:Fascial plane chest wall blocks are an integral component to optimal multimodal postoperative analgesia in breast and cardiothoracic surgery, facilitating faster functional recovery and earlier discharge. Pectoral nerves block and serratus plane block have been used to treat postsurgical pain after breast and cardiothoracic surgeries; however, they cannot be used to anesthetize the anterior chest wall. Ultrasound parasternal block, or pectointercostal fascial block and transversus thoracis muscle plane block are two novel ultrasound-guided anesthetic and analgesic techniques that block the anterior cutaneous branches T2 to T6 intercostal nerves, providing anesthesia and analgesia to the anterior chest wall. Ultrasound parasternal block/pectointercostal fascial block and transversus thoracis muscle plane block are performed in the region of the internal mammary artery and could be considered to treat post-thoracotomy pain. This anatomic region is innervated by the anterior cutaneous branches T2-to-T6 intercostal nerves, which are obliterated during cardiac surgery artery harvesting. At the level of the fourth parasternal rib interspace, the internal mammary artery can be identified between the internal intercostal muscle and transversus thoracis muscle as a longitudinal pulsatile structure approximately 1.5 cm from the lateral border of the sternum. The transversus thoracis muscle is variable in many people and, thus, is an unreliable target and is difficult to visualize with ultrasound. Moreover, patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting could have tissue disruption in the transversus thoracis plane because of the internal mammary artery harvest, making transversus thoracis muscle identification more difficult. Despite ultrasound parasternal block and transversus thoracis muscle plane block having good safety profiles and reduced risk of complications, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and internal mammary artery injury or hematoma should be considered. If the block is performed before cardiac surgery, both the right and left internal mammary arteries could be damaged. The injury could render the internal mammary artery unusable for bypass grafting. If the block is performed after left internal mammary artery harvesting at the end of coronary artery bypass grafting, only the right internal mammary artery could be damaged. In patients in whom the internal mammary artery has been surgically used and the transversus thoracis muscle is difficult to visualize, ultrasound parasternal block should be considered. In patients in whom the internal mammary artery could be difficult to visualize or considering that it is in the vicinity of the transversus thoracis muscle plane block target and that the transversus thoracis muscle is difficult to visualize with ultrasound after internal mammary artery harvesting, then ultrasound parasternal block should be considered. The authors believe that ultrasound parasternal block is the safer regional technique for protecting the internal mammary artery and the pleura because it is more superficial. For this reason, ultrasound parasternal block also could be performed by inexperienced anesthesiologists. Although ultrasound parasternal block is more superficial, its superiority in terms of safety is yet to be proven. Additional studies are warranted to validate the authors' hypothesis.
Transfer factor in viral infections

A. Zuckerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/258014A0

IF: 64.8

1975-11-01

Nature

Abstract:
Ultrasound Guided Parasternal Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study

Giuseppe Pascarella,Fabio Costa,Giulia Nonnis,Alessandro Strumia,Domenico Sarubbi,Lorenzo Schiavoni,Annalaura Di Pumpo,Lara Mortini,Stefania Grande,Andrea Attanasio,Giovanni Gadotti,Alessandro De Cassai,Alessia Mattei,Antonio Nenna,Massimo Chello,Rita Cataldo,Felice Eugenio Agrò,Massimiliano Carassiti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052060

2023-03-06

Abstract:Ultrasound guided parasternal block is a regional anaesthesia technique targeting the anterior branches of intercostal nerves, which supply the anterior thoracic wall. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the efficacy of parasternal block to manage postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery throughout sternotomy. A total of 126 consecutive patients were allocated to two different groups, receiving (Parasternal group) or not (Control group) preoperative ultrasound guided bilateral parasternal block with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine per side. The following data were recorded: postoperative pain expressed by a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative morphine consumption, time to extubation and perioperative pulmonary performance at incentive spirometry. Postoperative NRS was not significantly different between Parasternal and Control groups with a median (IQR) of 2 (0-4.5) vs. 3 (0-6) upon awakening (p = 0.07); 0 (0-3) vs. 2 (0-4) at 6 h (p = 0.46); 0 (0-2) vs. 0 (0-2) at 12 h (p = 0.57). Postoperative morphine consumption was similar among groups. However, intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the Parasternal group [406.3 ± 81.6 mcg vs. 864.3 ± 154.4, (p < 0.001)]. Parasternal group showed shorter times to extubation [(191 ± 58 min vs. 305 ± 72 min, (p)] and better performance at incentive spirometer with a median (IQR) of 2 raised balls (1-2) vs. 1 (1-2) after awakening (p = 0.04). Ultrasound guided parasternal block provided an optimal perioperative analgesia with a significant reduction in intraoperative opioid consumption, time to extubation and a better postoperative performance at spirometry when compared to the Control group.
Study on Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Block

WU Dao-zhu,HUANG Pin-tong,LI Ting,XU Xu-zhong,YU Wei-ping,YANG Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9011.2011.04.015

2011-01-01

Journal of Medical Imaging

Abstract:Objective:Observing the anaesthesia quality of supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus block by ultrasound-guided,we evaluated the value of the brachial plexus block by mean of high-resolution sonography in order to explore the new approach of peripheral nerve block.Methods:One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for elective surgery of forearm and hand or Arteriovenous fistulization of forearm were randomly divided into two groups,i.e.,supraclavicular(SCB) group and infraclavicular(ICB) group,with 60 subjects in each group.The performance time was recorded.The onset time and the block execution time of axillary nerve,median cutaneous nerve of arm,lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve,median antebrachial cutaneous nerve,ulnar nerve,median nerve,and radial nerve were measured respectively,and then the block quality was evaluated.Results:High-resolution ultrasound could successfully guided brachial plexus block and clearly displayed the local anesthetic distributing around never.The performance times were(4.5±3.2) min in SCB group and(3.9±1.6) min in ICB group(P0.05).The onset times of median antebrachial cutaneous,ulnar nerves and radial nervers in SCB group were(8.3±3.1) min,(7.1±2.8) min and(3.8±4.1) min,and these were(4.1±2.0) min,(3.6±1.7) min,and(8.5±1.8) min in the ICB.The onset times of the antebrachial cutaneous and ulnar nerves in the ICB group were significantly longer than these in SCB group(P0.05),and the radial nerve was shorter(P0.05).The complete success rates of block in SCB and ICB group were respectively 86% and 80%,respectively(P0.05).The incidence of complication for Horner syndrome in the SCB group was 16%,but there was no complication in ICB group.Conclusion:High-resolution sonography can clearly display the brachial plexus.Supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus block by ultrasound-guided are feasible technique in regional anaesthesia.Ultrasound-guided infracla vicular brachial plexus block is much safer and is deserved to apply in clinic practice.
Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block: A Novel Technique for Analgesia in Patients with Sternal Dehiscence

Pooja Joshi,Deepak Borde,Pramod Apsingekar,Swati Pande,Mangesh Tandale,Anand Deodhar,Sachin Jangle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_107_23

2024-04-01

Abstract:Sternal wound complications following sternotomy need a multidisciplinary approach in high-risk postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Poorly controlled pain during surgical management of such wounds increases cardiovascular stress and respiratory complications. Multimodal analgesia including intravenous opioids, non-opioid analgesics, and regional anesthesia techniques, like central neuraxial blocks and fascial plane blocks, have been described. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB), a novel technique, has been effectively used in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Under ultrasound (US) guidance PIFB is performed with the aim of depositing local anesthetic between two superficial muscles, namely the pectoralis major muscle and the external intercostal muscle. The authors report a series of five cases where US-guided bilateral PIFB was used in patients undergoing sternal wound debridement. Patients had excellent analgesia intraoperatively as well as postoperatively for 24 hours with minimal requirement of supplemental analgesia. None of the patients experienced complications due to PIFB administration. The authors concluded that bilateral PIFB can be effectively used as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia with general anesthesia and as a sole anesthesia technique in selected cases of sternal wound debridement.
Refining a great idea: the consolidation of PECS I, PECS II and serratus blocks into a single thoracic fascial plane block, the SAP block

Carlo D Franco,Konstantin Inozemtsev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-100745

2019-09-26

Abstract:The popularity of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks has impacted the practice of regional anesthesia in profound ways, improving some techniques and introducing new ones. Some of these new nerve blocks are based on the concept of fascial plane blocks, in which the local anesthetic is injected into a plane instead of around a specific nerve. Pectoralis muscles (PECS) and serratus blocks, most commonly used for post op analgesia after breast surgery, are good examples. Among the nerves targeted by PECS/serratus blocks are different branches of the brachial plexus that traditionally have been considered purely motor nerves. This unsubstantiated claim is a departure from accepted anatomical knowledge and challenges our understanding of the sensory innervation of the chest wall. The objective of this Daring Discourse is to look beyond the ability of PECS/serratus blocks to provide analgesia/anesthesia of the chest wall, to concentrate instead on understanding the mechanism of action of these blocks and, in the process, test the veracity of the claim. After a comprehensive review of the evidence we have concluded that (1) the traditional model of sensory innervation of the chest wall, which derives from the lateral branches of the upper intercostal nerves and does not include branches of the brachial plexus, is correct. (2) PECS/serratus blocks share the same mechanism of action, blocking the lateral branches of the upper intercostal nerves, and so their varied success is tied to their ability to reach them. This common mechanism agrees with the traditional innervation model. (3) A common mechanism of action supports the consolidation of PECS/serratus blocks into a single thoracic fascial plane block with a point of injection closer to the effector site. In a nod to transversus abdominus plane block, the original inspiration for PECS blocks, we propose naming this modified block, the serratus anterior plane block.
Ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks for post‐breast surgery pain syndrome

Nuno Ferreira‐Silva,Mark Friedrich B. Hurdle,Steven R. Clendenen,Amitabh Gulati,Sarah A. McLaughlin,Wesley Troyer,Raúl A. Rosario‐Concepción

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13341

IF: 3.079

2024-01-05

Pain Practice

Abstract:Introduction Persistent pain following breast surgery is common and may be challenging to treat. In patients refractory to conservative treatments, ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks of thoracic nerves can be a useful option. Results This type of neuro blockade technique provides advantages in terms of safety and efficacy that are convenient for physicians managing refractory and complex cases of post‐breast surgery syndrome. Conclusion This technical review aims to present an up‐to‐date summary of the most common ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks for chronic pain in post‐breast surgery patients, provide a detailed technical description of each intervention, and propose preferred injections based on the anatomical location of the pain.

clinical neurology,anesthesiology
A progress of research on the application of fascial plane blocks in surgeries and their future direction: a review article

Sandeep Bhushan,Xian Liu,Fenglin Jiang,Xiaowei Wang,Long Mao,Zongwei Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001282

2024-06-01

Abstract:Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are gaining popularity in clinical settings owing to their improved analgesia when combined with either traditional regional anesthesia or general anesthesia during the perioperative phase. The scope of study on FPBs has substantially increased over the past 20 years, yet the exact mechanism, issues linked to the approaches, and direction of future research on FPBs are still up for debate. Given that it can be performed at all levels of the spine and provides analgesia to most areas of the body, the erector spinae plane block, one of the FPBs, has been extensively studied for chronic rational pain, visceral pain, abdominal surgical analgesia, imaging, and anatomical mechanisms. This has led to the contention that the erector spinae plane block is the ultimate Plan A block. Yet even though the future of FPBs is promising, the unstable effect, the probability of local anesthetic poisoning, and the lack of consensus on the definition and assessment of the FPB's success are still the major concerns. In order to precisely administer FPBs to patients who require analgesia in this condition, an algorithm that uses artificial intelligence is required. This algorithm will assist healthcare professionals in practicing precision medicine.
Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Matthew J Cameron,Justin Long,Kenneth Kardash,Stephen S Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02726-0

Abstract:Purpose: Traditional multimodal analgesic strategies have several contraindications in cardiac surgery patients, forcing clinicians to use alternative options. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks, anesthetizing the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, are being explored as a straightforward method to treat pain after sternotomy. We sought to evaluate the literature on the effects of superficial parasternal blocks on pain control after cardiac surgery. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases for RCTs evaluating superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy published from inception to 11 March 2022. The prespecified primary outcome was opioid consumption at 12 hr. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluations. Outcomes were analyzed with a random-effects model. All subgroups were prespecified. Results: We reviewed 1,275 citations. Eleven RCTs, comprising 756 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only one study reported the prespecified primary outcome, precluding the possibility of meta-analysis. This study reported a reduction in opioid consumption (-11.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to -14.1) There was a reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hr (-7.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% CI, -5.6 to -8.7; five trials; 436 participants; moderate certainty evidence). All five studies measuring complications reported that none were detected, which included a sample of 196 blocks. Conclusion: The literature suggests a potential benefit of using superficial parasternal blocks to improve acute postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Future studies specifying dosing regimens and adjuncts are required. Study registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022306914); first submitted 22 March 2022.
Anatomical basis of fascial plane blocks

Ki Jinn Chin,Barbara Versyck,Hesham Elsharkawy,Maria Fernanda Rojas Gomez,Xavier Sala-Blanch,Miguel A Reina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-102506

2021-06-18

Abstract:Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are regional anesthesia techniques in which the space (“plane”) between two discrete fascial layers is the target of needle insertion and injection. Analgesia is primarily achieved by local anesthetic spread to nerves traveling within this plane and adjacent tissues. This narrative review discusses key fundamental anatomical concepts relevant to FPBs, with a focus on blocks of the torso. Fascia, in this context, refers to any sheet of connective tissue that encloses or separates muscles and internal organs. The basic composition of fascia is a latticework of collagen fibers filled with a hydrated glycosaminoglycan matrix and infiltrated by adipocytes and fibroblasts; fluid can cross this by diffusion but not bulk flow. The plane between fascial layers is filled with a similar fat-glycosaminoglycan matric and provides gliding and cushioning between structures, as well as a pathway for nerves and vessels. The planes between the various muscle layers of the thorax, abdomen, and paraspinal area close to the thoracic paravertebral space and vertebral canal, are popular targets for ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injection. The pertinent musculofascial anatomy of these regions, together with the nerves involved in somatic and visceral innervation, are summarized. This knowledge will aid not only sonographic identification of landmarks and block performance, but also understanding of the potential pathways and barriers for spread of local anesthetic. It is also critical as the basis for further exploration and refinement of FPBs, with an emphasis on improving their clinical utility, efficacy, and safety.

anesthesiology
The Medipol Combination: Novel Rectointercostal Fascial Plane Block and Pectointercostal Fascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Report of 15 Cases

Bahadir Ciftci,Burak Omur,Selcuk Alver,Ayse Nurmen Akin,Yahya Yildiz,Serkan Tulgar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001794

2024-06-05

Abstract:The parasternal blocks cannot cover the T7 and lower anterior and lateral branches of the thoracoabdominal nerves. In the open heart surgeries, chest drainage tubes are generally outside the target of the parasternal blocks. Recently, Tulgar et al described a novel interfascial plane block technique named "recto-intercostal fascial plane block" (RIFPB). RIFPB is performed between the rectus abdominis muscle and the sixth to seventh costal cartilages. RIFPB targets the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the T6-T9 thoracoabdominal nerves. In this clinical report, we want to share our experiences about pectointercostal plane block and RIFPB combination (Medipol Combination) after cardiac surgery.
Implementation of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Blocks in Conjunction With Transversus Thoracis Plane and Pectointercostal Fascial Blocks for Immediate Postoperative Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery

Lauren Everett,TomMario A Davis,Seema P Deshpande,Samhati Mondal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26592

2022-07-05

Cureus

Abstract:Pain continues to be a well-known complication of cardiac surgery in the postoperative period and intravenous opioid analgesia has traditionally been employed to manage cardiac surgical pain. However, both components have contributed to a multitude of undesirable adverse effects which can further exacerbate delays in recovery. Often overlooked in the analgesic plan, chest tube pain contributes significantly to the overall postoperative pain from cardiac surgery. Novel regional anesthetic blocks have shown great promise as analgesic adjuncts for cardiothoracic anesthesia but preliminary investigations focus primarily on management of sternotomy pain. Reduction of chest tube pain should be considered while implementing regional blocks to control surgical pain. This study presents a case where the rectus sheath block minimized chest tube pain after aortic valve replacement in conjunction with intercostal nerve blocks and a multimodal analgesic plan.
To Study the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Midline Sternotomy in Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study

Ganesh Singh,Sanjay Dhiraaj,Chetna Shamshery,Surendra Kumar Agarwal,Puneet Goyal,Suruchi Ambasta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_193_23

2024-10-01

Abstract:Background: The incidence of acute poststernotomy pain after cardiac surgery is 80%1. Pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) adjacent to the sternum anesthetizes the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves and may provide effective analgesia after sternotomy. Methodology: A randomized controlled, double-blinded, prospective comparative trial was conducted at a tertiary care center on patients of midline sternotomy between 18 and 65 years and NYHA Class 2 and 3 for open cardiac surgery with the primary aim to evaluate analgesia on deep breathing after 3 hours of PIFB block bilaterally. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups. PIFB was administered bilaterally before extubation, with 15 ml 0.125% bupivacaine plain (Group B), and bupivacaine+ clonidine 0.25 mcg/kg (Group B+C). Group C did not receive any intervention. All patients received acetaminophen 1 gram three times a day and injectable tramadol 1 mg/kg as a rescue analgesic. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among all the groups. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain was statistically lower (P < 0.05) in Groups B and B+C compared to Group C at rest, deep breathing, and coughing at 3, 6, and 12 hours after extubation. NRS on deep breathing in Groups B, B+C, and C was {(2.3, 1.5, 4.4) at 3 hours, (2.3, 1.6, 4.3) at 6 hours, (2.8, 2.1, 3.9) at 12 hrs, and {(4.3, 3.5, 3.6)} at 24 hours after extubation. The peak expiratory flow rate was the highest in Group B. Rescue analgesia was not required in Group B. Conclusion: PIFB reduces sternotomy pain compared to the control group on deep breathing at 3 hours after block, with delayed requirement of rescue analgesia and improved respiratory mechanics in terms of peak expiratory flow rate at all time points. There is no benefit from adding clonidine.
Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks in chronic pain: a narrative review

Francesco Marrone,Carmine Pullano,Alessandro De Cassai,Pierfrancesco Fusco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00205-y

2024-10-16

Abstract:Background: Recent studies have unveiled the intricate and distinctive nature of fascia, no longer regarding it solely as a muscle container. Recent research highlights its complex innervation and structure, signifying its significance in chronic pain pathways. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search (updated on February 2024) to evaluate the role of fascial plane blocks in chronic pain treatment. All article types (randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies along with case reports and case series) were deemed eligible for inclusion if they referenced "fascial plane blocks" for the control of chronic pain conditions (persistent post-surgical, neuropathic, musculoskeletal-myofascial and cancer-related) and were published between 2010 and February 2024. Results: The search revealed an increasing evidence in the literature for the implementation of fascial blocks in chronic pain management, although still heavily limited to case reports or series. Conclusion: With the integration of ultrasound technology and a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of action, the fascial plane blocks continue to broaden their application also in chronic pain management, as a part of a multimodal strategy or as an alternative to conventional drugs or opioids.
Parascapular Sub-Iliocostalis Plane Block: Comparative Description of a Novel Technique for Posterior Rib Fractures

Carlos Rodrigues Almeida

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13003

Abstract:We describe a new analgesic technique, parascapular sub-iliocostalis plane block (PSIP), for lateral-posterior rib fractures as an alternative to other regional techniques in a high-risk patient who suffered a decompensation of her cardiorespiratory function after posterior chest trauma. We performed a continuous ultrasound-guided left PSIP block in the sub-iliocostalis plane next to the fourth rib to optimize analgesia and minimize complications. The patient had total pain relief with marked improvement in her cardiorespiratory condition. No complications were reported. The efficacy of the PSIP block may potentially depend on different mechanisms of action: (1) direct action in the fracture site by craniocaudal myofascial spread underneath the erector spinae muscle (ESM); (2) spread to deep layers through tissue disruption caused by trauma, to reach the proximal intercostal nerves; (3) further medial spread through deeper layers to the midline to block the posterior and ventral spinal nerves; (4) medial spread below the ESM, to reach the posterior spinal nerves (more reliably than rhomboid intercostal / sub-serratus [RISS] block); and (5) lateral spread in the sub-serratus (SS) plane to reach the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves; while avoiding significant negative hemodynamic effects associated with techniques such as the paravertebral block (PVB), erector spinae plane (ESP) block or its variations, or thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). A comparative comprehensive overview of the regional techniques described for posterior chest trauma is presented, including TEA, PVB, ESP block, retrolaminar block, mid-point to transverse process block, costotransverse foramen block, RISS, and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block.
Clinical Evaluation of In-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Laterally Intercostal Approach

T Xu,M Li,Y Tian,J T Song,C Ni,X Y Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-167x.2017.01.027

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and success rate of in-plane ultrasound-guided paravertebral block using laterally intercostal approach.Methods:In the study,27 patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were selected to do paravertebral block preoperatively.The fifth intercostal space was scanned by ultrasound probe which was placed along the long axis of the rib and 8 cm lateral to the midline of the spine.The needle was advanced in increments aiming at the space between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles.Once the space between the muscles was achieved,20 mL of 0.5％ (mass fraction) ropivacaine was injected and a catheter was inserted.Whether the tip of catheter was in right place was evaluated by ultrasound image.The block dermatomes of cold sensation were recorded 10,20 and 30 min after the bolus drug was given.Then 0.2％ ropivacaine was infused with 6 mL/h via the catheter by an analgesia pump postoperatively.The block dermatomes of cold sensation and pain score were recorded 1,6,24 and 48 h postoperatively.Results:The first attempt success rate of catheteration was 81.48 ％ (22/27);the tips of catheter were proved in right places after the second or third attempt in 5 patients.The median numbers of the block dermatomes 10,20 and 30 min after the bolus drug was given were 2,3,4;the median numbers of block dermatomes were 5,5,5,4,and of pain score were 1,1,2,2 at 1,6,24,48 h postoperatively;no case of bilateral block,pneumothorax or vessel puncture occurred.Conclusion:Thoracic paravertebral block using laterally intercostal approach is feasible,which has high success rate of block and low rate of complications.

[History of nephrology in the past 100 years: Water-electrolyte imbalance].

Transversus thoracis muscle plane block in cardiac surgery: a pilot feasibility study

Ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state‐of‐the‐art review

An Expert Review of Chest Wall Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery

Chest Wall and Abdominal Blocks for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgeries: A Review

Avoiding the Internal Mammary Artery During Parasternal Blocks: Ultrasound Identification and Technique Considerations

Transfer factor in viral infections

Ultrasound Guided Parasternal Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study

Study on Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Block

Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block: A Novel Technique for Analgesia in Patients with Sternal Dehiscence

Refining a great idea: the consolidation of PECS I, PECS II and serratus blocks into a single thoracic fascial plane block, the SAP block

Ultrasound‐guided fascial plane blocks for post‐breast surgery pain syndrome

A progress of research on the application of fascial plane blocks in surgeries and their future direction: a review article

Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anatomical basis of fascial plane blocks

The Medipol Combination: Novel Rectointercostal Fascial Plane Block and Pectointercostal Fascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Report of 15 Cases

Implementation of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Blocks in Conjunction With Transversus Thoracis Plane and Pectointercostal Fascial Blocks for Immediate Postoperative Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery

To Study the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Midline Sternotomy in Open Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study

Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks in chronic pain: a narrative review

Parascapular Sub-Iliocostalis Plane Block: Comparative Description of a Novel Technique for Posterior Rib Fractures

Clinical Evaluation of In-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Laterally Intercostal Approach