Testing the relationship between preferences for infant-directed speech and vocabulary development: A multi-lab study
Melanie Soderstrom,Joscelin Rocha-Hidalgo,Luis E Muñoz,Agata Bochynska,Janet F Werker,Barbora Skarabela,Amanda Seidl,Yana Ryjova,Jennifer L Rennels,Christine E Potter,Markus Paulus,Mitsuhiko Ota,Nonah M Olesen,Karli M Nave,Julien Mayor,Alia Martin,Lauren C Machon,Casey Lew-Williams,Eon-Suk Ko,Hyunji Kim,Natalia Kartushina,Marina Kammermeier,Andrew Jessop,Jessica F Hay,Naomi Havron,Erin E Hannon,J Kiley Hamlin,Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez,Anja Gampe,Tom Fritzsche,Michael C Frank,Samantha Durrant,Catherine Davies,Cara Cashon,Krista Byers-Heinlein,Veronica Boyce,Alexis K Black,Christina Bergmann,Laura Anderson,Mohammed K Alshakhori,Ali H Al-Hoorie,Angeline S M Tsui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000254
2024-10-18
Abstract:From early on, infants show a preference for infant-directed speech (IDS) over adult-directed speech (ADS), and exposure to IDS has been correlated with language outcome measures such as vocabulary. The present multi-laboratory study explores this issue by investigating whether there is a link between early preference for IDS and later vocabulary size. Infants' preference for IDS was tested as part of the ManyBabies 1 project, and follow-up CDI data were collected from a subsample of this dataset at 18 and 24 months. A total of 341 (18 months) and 327 (24 months) infants were tested across 21 laboratories. In neither preregistered analyses with North American and UK English, nor exploratory analyses with a larger sample did we find evidence for a relation between IDS preference and later vocabulary. We discuss implications of this finding in light of recent work suggesting that IDS preference measured in the laboratory has low test-retest reliability.