Impact of chronic GVHD on QOL assessed by visual analogue scale in pediatric HSCT survivors and differences between raters: a cross-sectional observational study in Japan

Akira Hayakawa,Iori Sato,Kiyoko Kamibeppu,Yasushi Ishida,Masami Inoue,Atsushi Sato,Masaaki Shiohara,Hiromasa Yabe,Kazutoshi Koike,Souichi Adachi,Yoshiko Atsuta,Takuya Yamashita,Yoshinobu Kanda,Shinichiro Okamoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-021-03227-2
Abstract:A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted in long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in childhood to investigate the effect of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) on quality of life (QOL) and differences in QOL assessments between raters. QOL was evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Assessments were compared between the survivor, guardian, and attending pediatrician for those aged 15 years or younger, and between the survivor and attending pediatrician for those aged 16 years or older. For cGVHD, severity scores were obtained by organ and their association with the VAS score was analyzed. The average pediatrician-rated VAS score was higher than that of other raters for both patient age groups (< 15 years and > 16 years). By organ, involvement of the skin, digestive organs, and joints in GVHD affected the VAS scores. A high joint score was associated with a low VAS score, and conversely, a high lung score was associated with a low pediatrician-rated VAS score. Our results indicate that differences between raters must be considered when evaluating QOL of HSCT survivors, because patients appeared to experience grater inconvenience and difficulties due to joint GVHD than their pediatricians perceived.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?