ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEAD-CATALYZED HYDROLYSIS OF NUCLEOSIDE PHOSPHATES IN HISTOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS

H. Moses,A. Rosenthal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15.6.354
1967-06-01
Abstract:lead (Novikoff et at., J. Hislochem. Cytochem. 9: 434. 1961). 7. Finally, it should be noted that the Wachstein-Meisel medium remains free of lead phosphate precipitate through the incubation periods generally used for tissue sections, even at 37#{176}C. Thus the staining patterns of cytomembranes in tissue sections are more likely to result from enzyme activities than from specific lead phosphate adsorptions. Sections fail to show adsorption of lead phosphate: Sections were floated in the media, and lead phosphate was produced slowly by dropwise addition of 0.005 M phosphate, pH 7.4, as the medium was stirred. We tested: (1) heat-inactivated frozen sections of formaldehyde-calciumfixed tissues (90#{176}C,5 mm for rat sciatic nerve; 10 mm for rat kidney), at 4#{176} and 37#{176}C, with phosphate addition to Wachstein-Meisel medium over 10 mm; (2) nerve and kidney sections that had not been inactivated, in the Wachstein-Meisel medium to which 0.1 M sodium fluoride was added, with phosphate addition over 10 mm at 4#{176}C; and (3) noninactivated sections in the Wachstein-Meisel medium to which 0.01 M PCMB was added, with phosphate addition over 5, 10 and 30 mm at 4#{176}C. We also tested the effect upon staining of noninactivated sections in the usual Wachstein-Meisel medium to which phosphate was slowly added over 5 and 10 mm at 4#{176}C. In no instance did the presence of nonenzymatically produced lead phosphate in the medium produce staining of plasma membranes or other structures. To favor adsorption, the rate of lead phosphate production was kept low, in a manner reported in 1951 to produce nuclear adsorption in the alkaline phosphatase medium (Novikoff, Science 113: 320. 1951). It could also be argued, as Moses et at. do, that “difficulties in interpretation arise because most methods of inactivating ATPases also alter tissue proteins, phospholipids and other constituents.” We used not only heat-inactivated sections but also untreated sections. We exposed them to forming lead phosphate as they were incubated in the Wachstein-Meisel medium in the presence of fluoride or PCMB and in the absence of enzyme inhibitors. No sign of adsorption of nomenzymatically produced lead phosphate was observed. These considerations make it reasonable to conclude that the staining reactions obtained in the Wachstein-Meisel and similar media reflect real enzymatic activities. We would subscribe to our 1962 statement, “One may be tempted to suggest on the basis of such differences as are found in rat placenta and toad bladder, or from the wide substrate specificity seen in capillary endothelium or the narrow specificity of the -cytomembranes of kidney and parotid, that different enzymes are present in different membranes and they take part in the transport of special molecules or in different membrane activities” (Novikoff et at., Symp. mt. Soc. Cell Biol. 1: 149. 1962).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?