Abstract:We explore the utility of future photometric redshift imaging surveys for delineating the large‐scale structure of the Universe, and assess the resulting constraints on the cosmological model. We perform the following two complementary types of analysis. (i) We quantify the statistical confidence and the accuracy with which such surveys will be able to detect and measure characteristic features in the clustering power spectrum such as the acoustic oscillations and the turnover, in a ‘model‐independent’ fashion. We show for example that a 10 000‐deg2 imaging survey with depth r= 22.5 and photometric redshift accuracy δz/(1 +z) = 0.03 will detect the acoustic oscillations with 99.9 per cent confidence, measuring the associated preferred cosmological scale with 2 per cent precision. Such a survey will also detect the turnover with 95 per cent confidence, determining the corresponding scale with 20 per cent accuracy. (ii) By assuming a Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model power spectrum we calculate the confidence with which a non‐zero baryon fraction can be deduced from such future galaxy surveys. We quantify ‘wiggle detection’ by calculating the number of standard deviations by which the baryon fraction is measured, after marginalizing over the shape parameter. This is typically a factor of 4 more significant (in terms of number of standard deviations) than the above ‘model‐independent’ result. For both analyses, we quantify the variation of the results with magnitude depth and photometric redshift precision, and discuss the prospects for obtaining the required performance with realistic future surveys. We conclude that the precision with which the clustering pattern may be inferred from future photometric redshift surveys will be competitive with contemporaneous spectroscopic redshift surveys, assuming that systematic effects can be controlled. We find that for equivalent wiggle detection power, a photometric redshift survey requires an area approximately 12[δz/(1 +z)]/0.03 times larger than a spectroscopic survey, for a given magnitude limit. We also note that an analysis of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey may yield a marginal detection of acoustic oscillations in the imaging survey, in addition to that recently reported for the spectroscopic component.

Can a galaxy redshift survey measure dark energy clustering?

Probing dark energy with the next generation X-ray surveys of galaxy clusters

Cosmology with photometric redshift surveys

Tomographic Alcock-Paczynski Test with Redshift-Space Correlation Function: Evidence for the Dark Energy Equation of State Parameter w>-1

Lensing convergence and anisotropic dark energy in galaxy redshift surveys

Tomographic Alcock–Paczyński Test with Redshift-space Correlation Function: Evidence for the Dark Energy Equation-of-state Parameter w > −1

Probing dark energy using baryonic oscillations in the galaxy power spectrum as a cosmological ruler

High redshift cosmography: new results and implication for dark energy

On the capability of high redshift kSZ measurement with galaxy surveys

Cosmological constraints from unWISE and Planck CMB lensing tomography

Measuring the Universe with galaxy redshift surveys

Cosmology with high-redshift galaxy survey: Neutrino mass and inflation

Cosmological constraints from the tomographic cross-correlation of DESI Luminous Red Galaxies and Planck CMB lensing

Cosmological measurements from void-galaxy and galaxy-galaxy clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

New constraints on dark energy from the observed growth of the most X-ray luminous galaxy clusters

The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys V. The potential of cluster counts in the $1<z<2$ range

Hydrogen 21-cm Intensity Mapping at redshift 0.8

Uncorrelated Measurements of the Cosmic Expansion History and Dark Energy from Supernovae

Galaxy Clusters in Hubble Volume Simulations: Cosmological Constraints from Sky Survey Populations

Dark Energy Constraints from Weak Lensing Cross-Correlation Cosmography

The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using Lamost Redshift Survey