Methaemoglobinaemia after Ingestion of Anti-gas Ointment

W. Gough,N. Ashton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4382.854-a

1944-12-30

British Medical Journal

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Ambivalence Of Trust/Distrust In Innovative Team

Gm Bao,Zr Yang,Zs Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2005.1559275

2005-01-01

Abstract:Trust and distrust are separate and distinct constructs and they can coexist. However, distrust in team has been researched less than has trust, and few researches have been done on the dynamics of ambivalence of trust and distrust within innovative team and the relation with innovative team performance.Most of the trust-related research appears to position trust as a variable that has direct (main) effects on work group process and performance. But there are still some researchers argue that trust could operate on group performance indirectly through a moderating role.Following Dirks, we will analyze whether trust/distrust will moderate the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation. In other words, trust increases the likelihood that determinants of constructive controversy will actually result in favorable innovation; distrust decreases the likelihood.
Relationships Between Work Team Climate, Individual Motivation, and Creativity

Y. -Q. Zhu,D. G. Gardner,H. -G Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638161

IF: 13.5

2016-01-01

Journal of Management

Abstract:Creativity of employees is a major focus of research in the organization sciences. In this study we examine the relationships between both micro (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation) and molar (team climate) variables with manager-rated creativity of R&D employees. Specifically, we hypothesize that (a) extrinsic motivation has a direct relationship with creativity, (b) intrinsic motivation is more strongly related to creativity when extrinsic motivation is low compared to when it is high, (c) team collaborative and competitive climates have direct effects on creativity as well as indirect effects through individual motivation, and (d) intrinsic motivation mediates relationships of the climate variables with creativity, which in turn is moderated by extrinsic motivation. Data were collected from R&D engineers and their managers at a large high-tech company headquartered in Taiwan. Results indicate that a collaborative team climate has a direct positive relationship with creativity as well as one that operates through intrinsic motivation, which in turn was moderated by employee’s extrinsic motivation level. A competitive team climate positively related to extrinsic motivation, but extrinsic motivation did not directly relate to creativity. However, extrinsic motivation did have strong relationships with creativity when intrinsic motivation was low. Results suggest that perhaps the different types of motivation relate to different types of creativity (incremental versus radical). Managerial and theoretical implications of results are discussed as are the study’s limitations.
The Curvilinear Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Team Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Faultlines

Shenjiang Mo,Chu-Ding Ling,Xiao-Yun Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3430-1

IF: 6.331

2019-01-01

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:In this study, we built and tested a theoretical model to determine how ethical leadership affects team creativity among teams composed of different characteristics. Following social learning theory and an antecedent–benefit–cost framework, we conducted analyses of multisource data from 50 team supervisors and 186 employees, which revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between ethical leadership and team creativity. The teams exhibited more creativity when there was a moderate level of ethical leadership than when there were very low or very high levels. Moreover, from an interactional perspective, we found that team faultlines significantly moderated the curvilinear relationship between ethical leadership and team creativity such that the inverted U-shaped relationship was more significant among teams with weak team faultlines. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
The C-terminal tail of the rat lutropin/choriogonadotropin (CG) receptor independently modulates human (h)CG-induced internalization of the cell surface receptor and the lysosomal targeting of the internalized hCG-receptor complex.

M. Kishi,M. Ascoli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/MEND.14.6.0475

2000-06-01

Molecular Endocrinology

Abstract:The analysis of 21 progressive truncations of the C-terminal tail of the rat LH/CG receptor (rLHR) revealed the presence of a region delineated by residues 628-649 that, when removed, enhanced the degradation of the internalized human (h)CG. The analysis of these truncations also revealed the presence of a region delineated by residues 624-631 that, when removed, enhanced the rate of internalization of hCG. Since there is little overlap between these two regions, we conclude that the structural features of the rLHR that mediate internalization and degradation of the internalized hormone are different. Detailed analyses of cells expressing a truncation at Y637 (designated rLHR-t637) showed that the enhanced degradation of hCG observed in the these cells is due to an increase in the rate of transfer of the internalized hCG-rLHR complex from the endosomes to the lysosomes rather than to the enhanced dissociation of the hCG-rLHR complex in the lysosomes.
The Impact of Supervisor’s Creativity Expectation on Team Creativity

LIU Weiguo,FANG Yanran,SHI Junqi,MO Shenjiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.00667

2018-01-01

Abstract:Team creativity is becoming more and more essential for organizations to adapt to dynamically changing environment. Previous literature on team creativity was mainly focused on the impact of leadership behavior on employees' creative motivation and subsequent creative performance. Less attention has been paid to employees' cognitive response to leaders' expectation on creativity. Therefore, based on normative reference group theory and process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams, the current study attempted to examine the mediating effects of employees' behaviors in response to supervisor's creativity expectation (i.e., team knowledge exchange behavior and team boundary spanning behavior), and investigate the moderating role of supervisor's creative role identity. Data was collected from 568 employees working in 116 teams from four IT and software companies in Beijing and Shenzhen, China. Three waves of data collection were conducted. In the first wave, participants were required to report their demographic information (e.g. age, gender, education, and tenure), and their perceptions of supervisors' creativity expectation. In the second wave, participants assessed team knowledge exchange behavior and team boundary spanning behavior. In the third wave, team supervisors evaluated their own creative role identity and team creativity. We used Mplus 7.2 to estimate our hypothesized models. Results showed that: 1) supervisors' creativity expectation was positively related to both team knowledge exchange behavior and team boundary spanning behavior. 2) Team knowledge exchange behavior was positively associated with team creativity, whereas the relationship between team boundary spanning behavior and team creativity was not significant. 3) Supervisors' creative role identity significantly moderated the relationship between team boundary spanning behavior and team creativity. Specifically, when supervisors had high level of creative role identity, team boundary spanning behavior did not distract from team creativity, whereas when supervisors' creative role identity was low, team boundary spanning behavior harmed team creativity. The moderating effect of supervisor's creative role identity on the relationship between team knowledge exchange behavior and team creativity was not significant. The current study contributes to the literature of team creativity in several aspects. First, different from previous team creativity literature, this study demonstrated a cognitive model explaining how team leader's creativity expectation influences team creativity. Second, this study extended the normative reference group theory by clarifying the roles of leader's creativity expectation and creative role identity in enhancing team creativity. Specifically, our study implies that both of team knowledge exchange behavior and team boundary spanning behavior are both stimulated by team supervisors' creativity expectation. More importantly, supervisors' creative role identity plays an important role in mitigating the negative effects of team boundary spanning behavior on team creativity. Third, this study also contributed to the process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams by demonstrating the essential role of leader in enhancing the collective process of creative knowledge learning and sharing. Accordingly, managerial implications regarding team creativity management are discussed. We suggest that supervisors in knowledge-intensive companies should always be a real creator to enhance team creativity.
The Impact of Knowledge Difference and Knowledge Conflict on the Creativity of Team

Zhang Gang,Ni Xudong

2007-01-01

Acta Psychologica Sinica

Abstract:Introduction There are 2 approaches in the area of team diversity research.The first approach is to categorize types of diversity and then subdivide it.Scholars subdivided the diversity into race,age,gender,character,functional background,tenure,educational level,and so on,and then studied the effects of diversity on performance.The second approach is to study the intervening process,i.e.,conflict,which enables to determine the mechanism of the effect of diversity on performance.However,previous studies have some limitations.First,there is no comparison study on the 2 approaches.Secondly,previous studies hardly separated knowledge difference from diversity.Thirdly,these studies distinguished only the types of diversity but not the level of diversity.Hence,our study separated knowledge difference from team diversity and explored 3 questions.First,what is the impact of knowledge difference on team performance? Second,what is the difference between influence of knowledge difference alone and knowledge difference along with knowledge conflict on team performance? Third,what is the impact of different levels of knowledge difference on team performance? Method This study applied the experimental method and adopted a 2×2 between-subjects design.The independent variables were knowledge difference(2 levels:high and low) and knowledge conflict(2 levels:existent and inexistent).The dependent variable was creativity marks of the team.The experimental task required each team to present an innovative project based on experimental materials.Three experts used a 9-point rule to assign marks to these projects based on the level of creativity.The marks assigned by the 3 experts were summed to obtain the total creativity marks of each team.A total of 162 students(40 teams) participated in this experiment.ANOVA was used to analyze the data.Results 1.When the level of knowledge difference was low,knowledge conflict played a positive role in team creativity;in contrast,when the level of knowledge difference was high,knowledge conflict may facilitate or restrain creativity.Thus,knowledge conflict played a fluctuating role.2.When knowledge conflict was inexistent,high level of knowledge difference played a positive role in team creativity;when knowledge conflict was existent,the impact of teams with high level of knowledge difference on team creativity was not significantly different from that of teams with low level of knowledge difference.Conclusion In this study,knowledge difference was separated from team diversity and was associated with the variable of knowledge conflict in order to determine their effects on team creativity.There is an interaction between knowledge difference and knowledge conflict.Pure knowledge difference always positively affects creativity;however,when it is accompanied with knowledge conflict,mixed effects are observed.Knowledge difference along with knowledge conflict will not only strengthen creativity but also restrain it;this increases the risk of hampering team creativity.If the team needs to be considerably more creative,knowledge conflict should be encouraged in order to generate novel ideas.Although the cost of encouraging knowledge conflict involves the risk of considerably lower performance,it is worthy of implementing this strategy.If the team needs to be considerably more efficient,knowledge conflict should be restrained in order to achieve stable performance.
From Individual Creativity to Team Creativity:The Effect of Knowledge Diversity

Gang ZHANG,Jie L(U)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2012.04.008

2012-01-01

Abstract:In increasingly complex and uncertain environments,many organizations have turned to team-based work systems to increase their ability to foster innovation,requiring team members to integrate diverse knowledge and think creatively.Team creativity can occur as members interact with each other,as they share,build upon,and critique ideas together.Thus,we propose that team creativity is positively influenced by individual creativity and knowledge diversity,and the interaction of them is significant.The study designed the Chinese Remote Associates Test(CRAT) items and the task measured team creativity in the same logic,and carried out experimental studies to explore these questions.The present study demonstrated that team creativity might not be determined by team members' creativity.The interaction of team members can synergistically enhance team creative processes.Further,knowledge diversity actually benefits team performance,which can lead to better ideas,novel work process and innovative solutions.
Literature Review on the Creativity Research in Organizations

ZHANG Yan,HUAI Mingyun,ZHANG Zhen,LEI Zhuanying

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2011.02.010

2011-01-01

Abstract:This paper systematically reviews the individual,group,and context factors that influence creativity in organizations.Then some problems in previous research are analyzed and an overall theoretical framework is proposed.Further research directions are presented as follows: cross-culture research;multi-level research;research in moderating role of context factors;research in the obstacle factors of creativity;and dynamic research method adoption.
A Study on the Mechanism of Organizational Climate Impacts on Employee Creativity

Wang Duanxu,Hong Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2009.10.211

2011-01-01

Abstract:Employee creativity has become one of the determinants that enhance the competitiveness of enterprises.Studies have found that the organizational climate is essential for employee creativity;however,the mechanism through which the organizational climate affects employee creativity is still not well understood.The key to stimulating creativity lies in understanding the mental states of those engaged in creative work.Therefore,intrinsic motivation and mental involvement are both potential mediators of the relationships between organizational climate and employee creativity.An analysis of data obtained from 181 employees in various enterprises of Zhejiang province indicates that a supportive organizational climate is positively associated with employee creativity.This relationship was shown to be mediated by intrinsic motivation and mental involvement.These findings suggest that organizations should pay great attention to the mental states of employees while developing a supportive organizational climate in order to promote employee creativity.
Social capital and employee creativity: Evidence from the PRC

Duanxu Wang,HuiJuan Xue,Jie Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5305248

2009-01-01

Abstract:This study investigated how different dimensions of social capital influenced employee creativity and when the effects were stronger with a heterogeneous sample of teams in the PRC. Considering knowledge as the foundation of employee creativity, we integrated the mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderating role of knowledge characteristics in the relationship between social capital and employee creativity. The results demonstrated that (1) knowledge sharing mediated the relationship between social capital and employee creativity, but different dimensions of social capital exerted dissimilar effects on employee creativity via influencing knowledge sharing. (2) knowledge tacitness moderated the relationship between one dimension of social capital (shared vision) and employee creativity, but not the relationship between other dimensions (relation strength and trust) and employee creativity. Implications of these results were discussed. ©2009 IEEE.
Employees’ Feeling Trusted, Self-Concept and Creativity in Collectivistic Cultures

Hongli Wang,Qihai Huang,Xinzhong Xu,Cuiqi Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04938-x

IF: 2.8

2024-01-01

Current Psychology

Abstract:Existing research have revealed the positive impact of trust on employee’s creativity. Given that perception is the precursor of action, influence of trust on creativity tends to occur through employees’ perception and the process of the perceptual reaction of the self, which, however, fail to gain extensive attention in literature. Drawing on theories of social exchange and self-consistency, we develop a model to understand how employees in collectivistic cultures evaluate feeling trusted and regulate themselves in creativity by considering the role of self-concept. We test our model using a time-lagged design to collect data from the supervisor–subordinate dyads in two stages in China. Results show that organization-based self-esteem mediate the positive relationship between feeling trusted and creativity, and interdependent self-construal plays a moderating role in such relationship. Specifically, for subordinates with high interdependent self-construal, the positive relationship between organization-based self-esteem and creativity is not significant. Our research provide insight into how self-concept shapes the impact of leadership in term of trust on creativity theoretically, and practically contribute to management of trust and encouragement on employees’ creativity.
Innovation and Creativity in Organizations

Neil Anderson,Kristina Potočnik,Jing Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128

IF: 13.5

2014-03-17

Journal of Management

Abstract:Creativity and innovation in any organization are vital to its successful performance. The authors review the rapidly growing body of research in this area with particular attention to the period 2002 to 2013, inclusive. Conceiving of both creativity and innovation as being integral parts of essentially the same process, we propose a new, integrative definition. We note that research into creativity has typically examined the stage of idea generation, whereas innovation studies have commonly also included the latter phase of idea implementation. The authors discuss several seminal theories of creativity and innovation and then apply a comprehensive levels-of-analysis framework to review extant research into individual, team, organizational, and multilevel innovation. Key measurement characteristics of the reviewed studies are then noted. In conclusion, we propose a guiding framework for future research comprising 11 major themes and 60 specific questions for future studies.

management,business,psychology, applied
The Influence of Organizational Innovation Emphasis on Employee Creativity

YU Ting,ZHANG Zhengtang,ZHANG Yishan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3876/j.issn.1671-4970.2023.01.013

2023-01-01

Abstract:Employee creativity is the basis of enterprise innovation. How to improve employees’ creativity has always been a topic of common concern in business and academia. Based on role identity theory and social cognitive theory, this study explores the influence of organizational innovation emphasis on employee creativity and the moderating effect of employee self-efficacy. The empirical research on the paired data of supervisors and employees at three time points shows that the perception that the organization attaches importance to innovation will enhance employees’ creative role identity. Employees’ creative role identity then helps to improve their creativity. Creative role identity plays a mediating role between organizational innovation emphasis and employee creativity. And employee self-efficacy moderates the relationship between organizational innovation emphasis and employee creative identity, and the relationship is stronger for employees with higher self-efficacy. At the same time, creative self-efficacy moderates the mediating effect of creative role identity on the relationship between organizational innovation emphasis and employee creativity, and this mediating effect only exists when employees have high self-efficacy.
The Impact of Authentic Leadership Behavior on Team Creativity

Ran LI,Hui WANG,Jiahui ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.05.006

2016-01-01

Journal of Management Science

Abstract:Nowadays, rapid change of external environment and fierce market competition has called organizations for a continuous growing capability of innovation.In addition to individual creativity, both scholars and practitioners start to focus on how to im-prove team creativity.In our research, we investigate the impact of authentic leadership behavior on team creativity from a meso perspective and comprehensively analyze and test other impacting factors over team creativity including feedback-seeking climate, status conflict, and task interdependence. By survey, we collected data of 84 working teams in 8 organizations located in northeastern China from 2 time points and used statistical method to analyze it.We proved that①authentic leadership behavior had a significantly positive impact over team creativity;②the positive relationship between authentic leadership behavior and team creativity was mediated by feedback-see-king climate in the team;③status conflict in teams would moderate the positive relationship between authentic leadership behav-ior and feedback-seeking climate in the way that when there was high level of status conflict in the team, the positive relationship between authentic leadership behavior and feedback-seeking climate would be weakened.However, the moderating effect of task interdependence on the relationship between feedback-seeking climate and team creativity was not supported by data. Our research has made contributions to both theoretical development and management practice.First, our research shift re-search focus from the relationship between leadership style and individual creativity to its relationship with team creativity.We proved the positive relationship between authentic leadership behavior and team creativity by making theoretical argument and da-ta analyses.Our research also made contributions to the studies on leadership style and team creativity.Second, our research ex-plained the mechanism of how authentic leadership behavior would cast impact on team creativity by employing feedback-seeking climate.We also employed status conflict to analyze its moderation over the relationship between authentic leadership behavior and feedback-seeking climate.These developments made paves for future relevant studies.Third, this research had some inspira-tion for the practice of organizational management.This research revealed that leaders should conduct more authentic leadership behavior so that they can encourage employees to raise their self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, balanced processing, relational transparency and increase team creativity.Meanwhile, they should try to prevent status conflict in the team to prohibit its buffering effect. Future studies may consider more about the cross-level impact from organizational culture on team creativity.They should collect data from other countries or other regions to further test the conclusions we have reached in our research.Further more, there should be better ways to identify whether employees could recognize authentic leadership behavior and increase the credibili-ty and validity of this study.
Research Progress of Leadership and Organizational Creativity

Dongsheng XU,Wenli ZHOU,Yuandong GU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2017.10.024

2017-01-01

Abstract:On the basis of explaining the concept and research model of organizational creativity,this article reviews the researches of leadership and organizational creativity in recent years though a theory framework of leadership trait theory,behavior theory and contingency theory,and finally draws the conclusion and puts forward the views on the future research direction.Most studies show that leadership is an important factor in influencing organizational creativity;leader traits and behaviors have direct or indirect effects on organizational creativity;contingency factors,for examples,followers factors,organization environment factors,moderate the relationship of leader traits,leader behaviors and organization Creativity.
Inspiration or Preparation? Explaining Creativity in Scientific Enterprise

Xinyang Zhang,Dashun Wang,Ting Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.01450

2016-12-05

Social and Information Networks

Abstract:Human creativity is the ultimate driving force behind scientific progress. While the building blocks of innovations are often embodied in existing knowledge, it is creativity that blends seemingly disparate ideas. Existing studies have made striding advances in quantifying creativity of scientific publications by investigating their citation relationships. Yet, little is known hitherto about the underlying mechanisms governing scientific creative processes, largely due to that a paper's references, at best, only partially reflect its authors' actual information consumption. This work represents an initial step towards fine-grained understanding of creative processes in scientific enterprise. In specific, using two web-scale longitudinal datasets (120.1 million papers and 53.5 billion web requests spanning 4 years), we directly contrast authors' information consumption behaviors against their knowledge products. We find that, of 59.0\% papers across all scientific fields, 25.7\% of their creativity can be readily explained by information consumed by their authors. Further, by leveraging these findings, we develop a predictive framework that accurately identifies the most critical knowledge to fostering target scientific innovations. We believe that our framework is of fundamental importance to the study of scientific creativity. It promotes strategies to stimulate and potentially automate creative processes, and provides insights towards more effective designs of information recommendation platforms.
Teamwork in a Multicultural Context: The Driver of Creativity

Yi Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/51/20240842

2024-05-20

Abstract:This paper deeply explores the complex and dynamic relationship between team creativity and cultural factors and reveals how subtle cultural differences can play a dual role in shaping team creativity. Central to the study is an in-depth analysis of interactions between team members from different cultural backgrounds and how these interactions significantly influence the collective output of the team's creation. This detailed review of the extensive literature illustrates the important impact of team diversity, communication patterns, and leadership style on the profile shaping of team creativity. The center of the discussion is the dual nature of the organizational culture: it has both the potential to stimulate creativity within the team and the potential to inhibit it. Research shows that while cultural diversity brings unique perspectives and ideas that create mature environments for innovative thinking, it also presents significant challenges, including communication barriers and the generation of possible misunderstandings. Without skilled management, these problems can hamper the flow of ideas. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of fostering leadership styles and communication strategies for an open and supportive environment critical to thriving team creativity. In the text section, I integrate these findings into practical, actionable strategies that provide some feasible suggestions for organizations seeking to improve innovation. These strategies are deeply embedded in an understanding of cultural dynamics and aim to reform organizational practices to add some possibilities for us to achieve greater innovation and success in an increasingly diverse business world.
Workplace events and employee creativity: A multistudy field investigation

Yang Chen,Dong Liu,Guiyao Tang,Toschia M. Hogan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12399

IF: 5.47

2020-05-22

Personnel Psychology

Abstract:<p>A burgeoning body of research has examined the influence of stable attributes of individuals, teams, and organizations on employee creativity. Events, however, permeate the increasingly dynamic and uncertain business context. To extend the creativity literature, we draw on event system theory to examine whether, when, and how workplace events impact employee creativity. Our findings based on two time‐lagged field studies reveal that workplace event novelty and criticality interact to fuel employee improvisation and in turn, employee creativity. The positive relationship between workplace event novelty and employee improvisation is stronger when workplace events are more critical. Our research highlights the value of an event‐oriented theory building approach to investigate dynamic organizational phenomena.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved</p>

psychology, applied,management
A Review of Research on the Influence of Organizational Culture on Employee Innovation Behavior

Minxin Luo,Yuhang Cai,Mengge Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418101034

2024-01-21

SHS Web of Conferences

Abstract:Organizational culture has always been a mainstream issue of research in the field of organizations, and its connotation has been gradually enriched, perfected and presented a trend of diversification. Innovation is perceived as a critical factor in helping enterprises to retain competitive advantages, while employee innovation behaviour is thought to be the basis for enterprises to innovate. Using the definitions proposed by Chinese and foreign scholars in the past decade for reference and from the perspective of social cognitive theory, this paper, in the form of an argumentative essay, mainly to elaborate the connotation of organizational culture as well as the concept of employee innovation behavior, and it studies on the impact mechanism of organizational culture on employees and defines the research concepts on the impact of employee innovation behavior. And therefore the paper introduces the state of related research in China and abroad by outlining and summarizing the existing research, and points out that an organization creating atmosphere of encouragement for innovation can stimulate the employee's sense of self-efficacy and further make the individuals sense of self-reliance, sense of efficacy, which in turn leads to a sense of innovation among individual employees. This paper theoretically shows that organizational culture plays a rather positive part in guiding individual employee to display innovative behaviors, and by summarizing and reviewing the existing studies, it points out the future development prospect of this field, which will provide reference and help for the subsequent researchers to carry out their studies.
When the Mood Hits Your Eye: Interactive Effects of Cognition and Affect on Creativity

Tomas Thundiyil,Dan S. Chiaburu,Ning Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.12492abstract

2014-01-01

Abstract:Building on cognitive tuning theory, we test a model connecting employees’ positive and negative affect and creative self-efficacy with supervisor-rated creative performance. Based on data obtained from 459 subordinate-supervisor dyads from a large organization in China, we demonstrate that creative self-efficacy has a positive influence on employees’ creativity when employees experience both low levels of positive affect and high levels of negative affect. Building on these results, we call for more research examining the interplay between affective and cognitive influences on employees’ creative performance.

Methaemoglobinaemia after Ingestion of Anti-gas Ointment

The Ambivalence Of Trust/Distrust In Innovative Team

Relationships Between Work Team Climate, Individual Motivation, and Creativity

The Curvilinear Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Team Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Faultlines

The C-terminal tail of the rat lutropin/choriogonadotropin (CG) receptor independently modulates human (h)CG-induced internalization of the cell surface receptor and the lysosomal targeting of the internalized hCG-receptor complex.

The Impact of Supervisor’s Creativity Expectation on Team Creativity

The Impact of Knowledge Difference and Knowledge Conflict on the Creativity of Team

From Individual Creativity to Team Creativity:The Effect of Knowledge Diversity

Literature Review on the Creativity Research in Organizations

A Study on the Mechanism of Organizational Climate Impacts on Employee Creativity

Social capital and employee creativity: Evidence from the PRC

Employees’ Feeling Trusted, Self-Concept and Creativity in Collectivistic Cultures

Innovation and Creativity in Organizations

The Influence of Organizational Innovation Emphasis on Employee Creativity

The Impact of Authentic Leadership Behavior on Team Creativity

Research Progress of Leadership and Organizational Creativity

Inspiration or Preparation? Explaining Creativity in Scientific Enterprise

Teamwork in a Multicultural Context: The Driver of Creativity

Workplace events and employee creativity: A multistudy field investigation

A Review of Research on the Influence of Organizational Culture on Employee Innovation Behavior

When the Mood Hits Your Eye: Interactive Effects of Cognition and Affect on Creativity