Abstract:To understand the ecological impacts of the transgenic Bt (CryI(c)) cotton on natural enemies of the target pest, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), and non-target arthropods in cotton fields, a systematic survey was made in a transgenic (Bt) and a conventional cotton field in Nanpi county, Hebei Province in 1997. Both plots were about 0.3 hm 2. All arthropod species and their numbers were recorded by visual observation on 100 plants in 10 standard sampling spots between May and October at five-day intervals. The non-target insect pests, natural enemies and neutral arthropods were distinguished, based on their trophic relationships, as well as taxonomy. Species richness, species abundance and community diversity indices were used to analyze and compare the seasonal trends of different functional groups in both cotton fields. The systematic survey showed that: (1) More species and individuals were observed in the Bt-cotton plot than the conventional plot. The number of phytophagous species was 43 in Bt-vs. 28 in conventional plot, there were 56 (Bt-) vs. 46 (conventional) natural enemy species. Sixteen species in Bt-cotton and 14 species in conventional cotton were classified as ‘neutral'. (2) The individual numbers for the categories of pests, natural enemies and neutral arthropods were 12941, 8690 and 10790, respectively, in transgenic Bt cotton field; while 15616, 2880 and 2739 in the conventional plot. Thus, the average abundance of natural enemies and neutral arthropods in transgenic Bt cotton field increased by 97.6% and 158.0%, respectively, whereas the abundance of phytophagous pests decreased by 45.7%. (3) In transgenic Bt cotton field, the populations of cotton bollworm (H. armigera), decreased by 98.9% compared to the conventional plot; the aphid Aphis gossypii and the thrip (Heliothrips indicus Bagnall), decreased by 69.0% and 72.6%, respectively. The phytophagous bugs (Lygus lucorum and Adelphocoris rapidus), cotton whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) and leafhopper (Empoasca biguttula) increased by 2.2, 3.2 and 14.8 times, respectively. The abundance of natural enemy and neutral insect group in both fields were significantly higher than that of insect pest group at the early and late cotton growing seasons, but much lower at the middle growing season. The ratio of insect pest to natural enemy in the middle cotton growing season was 1.68 : 1 in transgenic Bt cotton field, and 6.78∶1 in the conventional IPM cotton field. Compared to the conventional IPM cotton field, the species diversity and functional groups diversity in transgenic Bt cotton field decreased by 15.3% and 66.9%, respectively. Biodiversity and functional groups abundance dynamics indicated that the arthropod community in transgenic Bt cotton field was more stable than that in the conventional IPM cotton field. The neutral arthropods and secondary pests played an important role in regulating food chain of pest-natural enemy.

Transgenic Cry1Ac + CpTI cotton does not compromise parasitoid-mediated biological control: An eight-year case study

Bt Cotton Producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab Does Not Harm Two Parasitoids, Cotesia Marginiventris and Copidosoma Floridanum

Effect of Bt Protein on Development of Different Strains of the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa Armigera (hbner) and the Parasitoid, Microplitis Mediator (Haliday)

Using Resistant Prey Demonstrates That Bt Plants Producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, and Cry1F Have No Negative Effects on Geocoris Punctipes and Orius Insidiosus.

The interaction of two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch, with Cry protein production and predation by Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) in Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab cotton and Cry1F maize

Effects of Bt cotton on Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its predator, Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae).

Bt Crops Producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab and Cry1F Do Not Harm the Green Lacewing, Chrysoperla Rufilabris

Bt Crops Benefit Natural Enemies to Control Non-Target Pests.

Assessing the effects of Cry1C rice and Cry2A rice to Pseudogonatopus flavifemur , a parasitoid of rice planthoppers

Impact of Transgenic Cotton Plants on a Non‐target Pest, Aphis Gossypii Glover

Transgenic Bt Cotton Does Not Disrupt the Top-Down Forces Regulating the Cotton Aphid in Central China

Transgenic insect-resistant Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac/1Ab does not harm the insect predator Geocoris pallidipennis

Structure and Seasonal Dynamics of Arthropods in Transgenic Cotton Fields

Effects of Transgenic Insect-resistant Cotton on Development and Metabolite Content of Cotton Aphid Aphis Gossypii

Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Population Density, Oviposition Behavior, Development, and Reproduction of a Nontarget Pest, Adelphocoris Suturalis (hemiptera: Miridae)

Identification of Top-Down Forces Regulating Cotton Aphid Population Growth in Transgenic Bt Cotton in Central China

Identification of Top-Down Forces Regulating Cotton Aphid Population Growth in Transgenic Bt Cotton in Central China.

Pest trade-offs in technology: reduced damage by caterpillars in Bt cotton benefits aphids

Effects of the transgenic CrylAc and CpTI insect-resistant cotton SGK321 on rhizosphere soil microorganism populations in northern China

Transgenic cotton expressing Cry1B protein has no adverse effect on predatory insect Propylea Japonica

Comparative studies on the effects of Bt-transgenic and nontransgenic cotton on arthropod diversity, seedcotton yield and bollworms control