When clinical experiences clashes against evidence based medicine: the case of aspiration thrombectomy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

U. Barbero,F. D’Ascenzo,F. Gaita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.33
2016-01-21
Journal of Thoracic Disease
Abstract:Deciding when to apply a procedural technique, during a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a matter of “know how” for the interventional cardiologist, from decision of correct antiaggregant/anticoagulation to choice of complete vs. not revascularization and, among the most debated, thrombus aspiration (1-3).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?