DNA adduct formation and reduced EIF4A3expression contributes to benzo[a]pyrene-induced DNA damage in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells

Mengcheng Li,Jiayu Liu,Jiazhen Zhou,Anfei Liu,Enzhao Chen,Qiaoyuan Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.08.010
2021-10-15
Abstract:Benzo[a]pyrene(B[a]P) is a known human carcinogen. The ability of B[a]P to form stable DNA adducts has been repeatedly demonstrated. However, the relationship between DNA adduct formation and cell damage and its underlying molecular mechanisms are less well understood. In this study, we determined the cytotoxicity of benzo[a]pyrenediolepoxide, a metabolite of B[a]P, in human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B). The formation of BPDE-DNA adducts was quantified using a dot blot. DNA damage resulting from the formation of BPDE-DNA adducts was detected by chromatin immuneprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq), with minor modifications, using specific antibodies against BPDE. In total, 1846 differentially expressed gene loci were detected between the treatment and control groups. The distribution of the BPDE-bound regions indicated that BPDE could covalently bind with both coding and non-coding regions to cause DNA damage. However, the majority of binding occurred at protein-coding genes. Furthermore, among the BPDE-bound genes, we found 16 protein-coding genes related to DNA damage repair. We explored the response to BPDE exposure at the transcriptional level using qRT-PCR and observed a strong inhibition of EIF4A3. We then established an EIF4A3 overexpression cell model and performed comet assays, which revealed that the levels of DNA damage in EIF4A3-overexpressing cells were lower than those in normal cells following BPDE exposure. This suggests that the BPDE-DNA adduct-induced reduction in EIF4A3 expression contributed to the DNA damage induced by BPDE exposure in BEAS-2B cells. These novel findings indicate that ChIP-Seq combined with BPDE specific antibody may be used for exploring the underlying mechanism of DNA adduct-induced genomic damage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?