Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided techniques for vessel catheterization in children undergoing cardiac surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
A Ibrahim,A R Allam,A M Amin,M Abuelazm,M S Rakab,A Alhadeethi,A W Hageen,A Mahmoud,M Abouzid,B Abdelazeem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3110
IF: 39.3
2024-10-30
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Pediatric heart surgery is the first treatment option for congenital heart disease, which is the leading cause of death in Children. Arterial cannulation (AC) and Central venous catheter (CVC) are required in pediatric cardiac surgery for continuous monitoring of the central venous pressure (CVP), replacement of fluid and blood products, close hemodynamic monitoring, and frequent sampling for arterial blood gases (ABG). Purpose We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the ultra-sound guided technique compared to the traditional palpation-guided technique for vessel catheterization in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until February 2024. We used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Thirteen RCTs with 1060 children were included. Regarding arterial cannulation, ultrasound-guided technique was associated with a statistically significant increase in successful cannulation [RR: 1.31 with 95% CI (1.10, 1.56), P< 0.0001], and first-attempt success [RR: 1.88 with 95% CI (1.35, 2.63), P< 0.0001]; however, it was not associated with any statistically significant difference in venous cannulation in both outcomes with [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (0.98, 1.30), P= 0.10], [RR: 1.53 with 95% CI (0.86, 2.71), P= 0.15] respectively. Moreover, ultrasound-guided technique was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of attempts either in arterial cannulation with [MD: -0.73 with 95% CI (-1.00, -0.46), P< 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: -1.34 with 95% CI (-2.55, -0.12), P= 0.03], and the time of attempted cannulation also either in arterial cannulation with [MD: -2.27 with 95% CI (-3.38, -1.16), P< 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: -4.13 with 95% CI (-7.06, -1.19), P< 0.0001]. Finally, ultrasound-guided technique was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of any complications either in arterial cannulation with [RR: 0.36 with 95% CI (0.18, 0.71), P< 0.001] or in venous cannulation with [RR: 0.30 with 95% CI (0.11, 0.84), P= 0.02]. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization increases the number of successful catheterizations and first-attempt success rate; however, there was no significant difference in venous cannulation, while both arterial and venous cannulation were associated with decreased number of attempts, reduced overall procedure time, and decreased incidence of complications.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems