Abstract:Background: Being an autologous graft, a subepithelial connective tissue (SECT) graft shows more predictable root coverage better than other techniques. Hence, it is most likely to be widely used for recession treatment. During root planing, a smear layer forms on the root surface that cannot be removed by water or saline rinsing. To remove this smear layer, root biomodification agents are widely used. The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of an SECT graft for root coverage with and without root biomodification. Methods: This study included 20 patients with no gender predilection, with an age range of 24-36 years and a mean age of 27.6 ± 4.24 years. The chosen range facilitated the acquisition of data in a relatively homogeneous population, minimizing the confounding effects of factors such as aging-related tissue changes or early-onset periodontal issues. All 40 sites were treated with the SECT and coronally advanced flap. Root conditioning in controls was done with distilled saline and tested using 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) gel (Maquira; STM Meditech, Kerala). At baseline and at one, three, and six months postoperatively, pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were assessed at four sites using a UNC-15 probe, and from the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), the vertical recession was assessed. Results: For the buccal surface, CALs were reduced significantly (p < 0.001). Following root conditioning with 24% EDTA, no difference was seen in the CAL in the control and test group either buccally or interproximally with a p-value of greater than 0.05. For PD, following a SECT graft or root conditioning, no significant change was observed in the buccal or interproximal region (p > 0.05). The vertical recession was significantly reduced with a p-value of less than 0.001 and depth coverage of 97.5%. The difference between the two groups was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). The root surface coverage decreased significantly from 16.6 ± 2.8 to 0.45 ± 0.4 from baseline to six months, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). This intergroup difference was non-statistical (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The present study concludes that the use of an SECT graft in root coverage can significantly improve the CAL, root surface area, and vertical recession both with and without root biomodification. We conclude that there is a significant decrease in the probing depth following SECT grafting and with root biomodification.

Effect of 24% EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial

Effect of EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long‐term Stability of Root Coverage Procedures for Single Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross‐linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: 12‐month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial

Effect of EDTA root conditioning on the healing of intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative

Prognostic Parameters for Clinical Treatment Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of enamel matrix derivatives on root coverage: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

Digitally Measured Exposed Root Surface Area for Predicting the Effectiveness of Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Combined De-Epithelialized Gingival Grafting in the Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions

Root surface biomodification with EDTA for the treatment of gingival recession with a semilunar coronally repositioned flap

Clinical evaluation of the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with connective tissue graft or concentrated growth factor using tunnel technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions with Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane and Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique Via Digital Measurements: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Root surface modifiers and subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review

Comparison of acidic and neutral PH root conditioners prior to a coronally positioned flap to treat gingival recession

Tunnel technique with cross-linked hyaluronic acid in addition to subepithelial connective tissue graft, compared with connective tissue graft alone, for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: 6-month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial

Clinical outcomes after treatment of non-contained intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative or guided tissue regeneration: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures

Quantification of growth factors in advanced platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factors and their clinical efficiency as adjunctive to the GTR procedure in periodontal intrabony defects

Root coverage with platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft: a split-mouth randomized trial

Comparison of Root Coverage by the Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft With and Without Root Biomodification: A Comprehensive Clinical Study

Effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller Class I/II single gingival recession with thin gingival phenotype: study protocol for a split-mouth randomised controlled trial

The Adjunctive Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin to Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Buccal Recession Defects: Results of a Randomized, Parallel-Group Controlled Trial