Long-term in vivo two-photon imaging of the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical implants and micro-vessel disruptions in awake mice

Qianru Yang,Alberto L Vazquez,Xinyan Tracy Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121060
IF: 14
Biomaterials
Abstract:Our understanding of biomaterials in the brain have been greatly enhanced by advancements in in vivo imaging technologies such as two-photon microscopy. However, when applied to chronic studies, two-photon microscopy enables high-resolution imaging only in superficial regions due to inflammatory responses introduced by the craniotomy and insertion of foreign biomaterials. Microprisms provide a unique vertical view from brain surface to ~1 mm deep or more (depending on the size of the microprisms) which may break through this limitation on imaging depth. Although microprism has been used in the field of neuroscience, the in vivo foreign body responses to the microprism implant have yet to be fully elucidated. This is of important concern in broader applications of this approach, especially for neuroinflammation-sensitive studies. In this work, we first assessed the activation of microglia/macrophages for 16 weeks after microprism implantation using two-photon microscopy in awake CX3CR1-GFP mice. The imaging window became clear from bleedings after ~2 weeks and the maximum imaging distance (in the horizontal direction) stabilized at around 500 μm after ~5 weeks. We also quantified the microglial morphology from week 3 to week 16 post-implantation. Compared to non-implant controls, microglia near the microprism showed higher cell density, smaller soma, and shorter and less branched processes in the early-chronic phase. After week 5, microglial morphology further than 100 μm from the microprism was generally similar to microglia in the control group. In addition, time-lapse imaging confirmed that microglial processes were surveying normally from week 3, even for microglia as close as 50 μm away. These morphological analyses and dynamic imaging results suggest that microglia around chronically implanted microprism eventually exhibit inactive phenotypes. Next, we examined microglial/macrophage responses following laser induced micro-vessel disruptions as an example application of microprism implantation for neuroinflammation related studies. Through the microprism, we captured microglial/macrophage polarization and migration, as well as blood flow changes after the insult for additional 16 weeks. To our surprise, microglia/macrophage aggregation around the insult site was sustained over the 16-week observation period. This work demonstrates the feasibility of using microprisms for long-term characterizations of inflammatory responses to other injuries including implantable devices at deeper depths than that achievable by conventional two-photon microscopy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?