The distribution of calmodulin/calmodulin binding proteins in the rat tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta.

J. Eastlake,C. Branford-White,W. Whish

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(94)90102-3

1994-08-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial

Kathryn E Beckermann,Aviva G Asnis-Alibozek,Michael B Atkins,Bernard Escudier,Thomas E Hutson,Vijay Kasturi,David F McDermott,Sumanta K Pal,Camillo Porta,Brian I Rini,Elena Verzoni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad348

2024-01-23

The Oncologist

Abstract:Abstract Background Tivozanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Long-term exploratory analyses from the TIVO-3 trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) RCC including patients (26%) with prior immuno-oncology (IO) therapy are reported. Methods Patients with R/R advanced RCC that progressed with 2 or 3 prior systemic therapies (≥1 VEGFR TKI) were randomized to tivozanib 1.5 mg QD or sorafenib 400 mg BID, stratified by IMDC risk and previous therapy. Safety, investigator-assessed long-term progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and serial overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results Mean time on treatment was 11.0 months with tivozanib (n = 175) and 6.3 months with sorafenib (n = 175). Fewer grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred with tivozanib (46%) than sorafenib (55%). Dose modification rates were lower with tivozanib than sorafenib across age/prior IO subgroups; prior IO therapy did not impact dose reductions or discontinuations in either arm. Landmark LT-PFS rates were higher with tivozanib (3 years: 12.3% vs 2.4%; 4 years: 7.6% vs 0%). After 22.8 months mean follow-up, the OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.14); when conditioned on 12-month landmark PFS, tivozanib showed significant OS improvement over sorafenib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; 2-sided P = .0221). Conclusions Tivozanib demonstrated a consistent safety profile and long-term survival benefit in patients with R/R advanced RCC who were alive and progression free at 12 months. These post hoc exploratory analyses of LT-PFS and conditional OS support a clinically meaningful improvement with tivozanib versus sorafenib in this advanced RCC population.

oncology
The role of the clinical pharmacist in reducing mortality in hospitalized cardiac patients: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial using propensity score methods.

Xiao-bo Zhai,Dan-Dan Tian,Xiao-yan Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5414/CP202111

2015-03-01

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract:BACKGROUND Meta-analyses have suggested that pharmacist-led medication reviews have no discernable effect on patient mortality. These analyses may not have found a statistically significant effect because they did not adequately control for the patient selection parameters. Therefore, a more precise approach to evaluating the effect of clinical pharmacist interventions on the mortality rates of hospitalized cardiac patients is required. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of the clinical pharmacist as a direct patient-care team member on the mortality of all patients admitted to cardiology units. METHODS A prospective, nonrandomized observational study compared patients who received standard care with patients admitted to a service that included clinical pharmacists. Propensity score matching was applied to enhance the comparability. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of all-cause mortality in the study group and the control group. RESULTS Pharmacists were consulted by physicians to correct any drug-related issues that they suspected may cause or contribute to a fatal outcome in the cardiology ward. A total of 428 interventions were suggested by the clinical pharmacist in the study group; 375 (87.6%) of them were accepted by the cardiology team. All-cause mortality was 1.8% during phase 1 treatment (preintervention) and was reduced to 1.1% during phase 2 treatment (postintervention); the difference was statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in all-cause mortality in the control unit between phase 1 and phase 2. Results were similar in the propensity score-matched subcohort. CONCLUSIONS Drug-related problems that were suspected to cause or contribute to a possibly fatal outcome were determined by the clinical pharmacist service in patients hospitalized in a cardiology ward. Correction of these drug-related problems by physicians after the pharmacist's advice caused a significant decrease in mortality as analyzed by propensity score matching. The significant reduction in the mortality rate in this patient population observed in this study is "hypothesis generating" for future randomized studies.
Current Status of Tivozanib in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Minas Sakellakis,Roubini Zakopoulou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35675

2023-03-02

Cureus

Abstract:The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) has transformed the therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, dose reductions and interruptions are frequently needed due to limited toxicity, mostly from off-target effects. Tivozanib is a potent, selective VEGFR TKI with weak off-target effects. TIVO-1 and TIVO-3 were randomized controlled phase 3 trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of tivozanib versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy and after failing two previous lines (including targeted therapy), respectively. Tivozanib did not confer any survival advantage, but it significantly increased progression-free survival, response rates, and the duration of responses with a superior safety profile. Although results from subgroup analysis need to be interpreted cautiously, tivozanib demonstrated superiority after two previous lines of VEGFR TKIs or after axitinib, another selective VEGFR inhibitor. Tivozanib also demonstrated durable activity after therapy with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor, while an ongoing study investigating the combination of tivozanib/nivolumab has shown promising preliminary results regarding efficacy and safety. In conclusion, tivozanib was recently added to our therapeutic armamentarium against advanced RCC. Ongoing rational therapeutic combinations of tivozanib will determine the optimal setting in which the maximum benefit can be derived.
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tivozanib (TIVO) in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Andrew Johns,Matthew T Campbell,Mamie Gao,Zita Dubauskas Lim,Emily Wang,Andrew Warren Hahn,Jianjun Gao,Amishi Yogesh Shah,Pavlos Msaouel,Nizar M. Tannir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.419

IF: 45.3

2024-02-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:419 Background: TIVO, a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor that predominantly targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, is approved as a third or later line therapy for advanced RCC based on improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with sorafenib in the TIVO-3 trial. However, TIVO-3 was conducted before immune checkpoint-based therapies (ICT), cabozantinib (CABO), and lenvatinib/everolimus (LEN/EVE) became fully incorporated in the sequential treatment paradigm for advanced ccRCC. Hence, an appraisal of the role of TIVO in the current RCC treatment landscape is warranted. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of pts with advanced ccRCC treated with TIVO at MD Anderson Cancer Center during 6/2021-7/2023. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical records. A blinded radiologist assessed tumor response by RECIST v1.1. We assessed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate [percentage of all treated pts who achieved a complete or partial response (PR) or had stable disease (SD) for ≥6 months (mo)], time on treatment (TOT), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 30 pts (23 males, 7 females; median age 66 years, range 43-80) were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 10.8 mo. At initiation of TIVO, 77% of pts had ECOG PS 0/1, 23% had PS ≥2; 53% had intermediate-risk and 47% had poor-risk disease by IMDC; 83% had ≥3 metastatic sites; 80% had prior nephrectomy. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-8). All pts received prior ICT (30% nivolumab/ipilimumab), 40% received prior axitinib, 87% CABO and 60% LEN +/- EVE. 23 pts (76.7%) started TIVO at full-dose (1.34 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off) and 7 pts (23.3%) at 0.89 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off. Of 26 pts with evaluable radiographic response, 2 pts had a confirmed PR (ORR 7.7%) and 5 pts had SD for ≥6 mo (clinical benefit rate 23.3%). Median TOT was 3.2 mo (range, 0.1-13.5), median PFS 3.7 mo (range, 0.7-13.5); median OS has not been reached (13 pts had died at time of analysis). 7 pts (23.3%; 5 pts who started at 1.34 mg/d and 2 pts who started at 0.89 mg/d) required dose-reduction due to treatment related adverse events (TRAEs). 15 pts (50%) had ≥1 any grade TRAE; 4 pts (13.3%) had any grade hypertension. There were 6 Grade ≥3 TRAEs [congestive heart failure (3), hypertension, mucositis, GI perforation]. 5 pts (16.6%) were continuing treatment with TIVO at time of analysis; 20 pts (66.7%) discontinued TIVO due to progressive disease, 3 pts (10%) for TRAEs, and 2 pts for other reasons (infection, worsening of prior ICT-mediated neuropathy). 1 pt died of TIVO-related GI perforation. Conclusions: In this cohort of heavily pretreated pts with advanced ccRCC, TIVO yielded a modest clinical benefit in a minority of pts who received prior ICT, CABO, and LEN +/- EVE. TRAEs observed with TIVO were consistent with previously published reports.

oncology
Tivozanib in relapsed or refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma: a focus on US approval

Hollis Viray,David F McDermott,David J Einstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2022.2088515

Abstract:Introduction: Tivozanib is a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-inhibitor designed to, more specifically, bind to the VEGF receptor with fewer off-target interactions with other tyrosine kinase receptors in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Areas covered: Both preclinical and early clinical studies have suggested tivozanib could be a more potent VEGFR inhibitor with less off-target toxicities for patients. After a complicated clinical development process, the drug was approved by the FDA for third- and fourth-line use in relapsed, refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in March of 2021 based on the results of the TIVO-3 trial. However, questions remain regarding the proper incorporation of tivozanib in the current treatment landscape of RCC. Expert opinion: Here, we review the existing literature surrounding tivozanib and comment on its optimal use in current and future clinical practice. We suggest that tivozanib may be considered in relapsed, refractory RCC in the later-line treatment setting following progression on both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and nonselective VEGFR-TKIs. We anticipate the application of tivozanib in RCC will continue to evolve as trials exploring tivozanib in combination with ICIs may move this drug earlier in the future treatment landscape of RCC.
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tivozanib in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Andrew C Johns,Matthew T Campbell,Mamie Gao,Andrew W Hahn,Zita Lim,Emily Wang,Jianjun Gao,Amishi Y Shah,Pavlos Msaouel,Nizar M Tannir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae037

2024-03-13

The Oncologist

Abstract:Abstract Background Tivozanib has been approved as a third-line or later therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma based on the TIVO-3 trial, which was conducted before immune checkpoint therapies (ICT), cabozantinib, and lenvatinib/everolimus became incorporated in the current sequential treatment paradigm for advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with advanced ccRCC treated with tivozanib at MD Anderson Cancer Center during 6/2021-7/2023. A blinded radiologist assessed tumor response by RECIST v1.1. We assessed overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) [percentage of all treated patients who achieved radiologic response or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 6 months], progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Of 30 analyzed patients, 23% had performance status ≥ 2; 47% had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) poor-risk disease. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1-8). All patients received prior ICT, 87% cabozantinib and 60% lenvatinib ± everolimus. Of 26 evaluable patients, 2 patients had confirmed partial response (ORR 7.7%); 5 patients had SD for ≥ 6 months (CBR 23.3%). Median PFS was 3.8 months (range 0.7-13.9); median OS was 14.1 months (range 0.3-28.5). Fifteen patients (50%) had ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). There were 6 grade ≥ 3 TRAEs [hypertension, congestive heart failure (3), mucositis, and GI perforation (grade 5)]. Conclusions In this cohort of heavily pretreated patients with advanced ccRCC, tivozanib yielded a modest clinical benefit in a minority of patients who received prior ICT, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib ± everolimus. TRAEs were consistent with previously published reports.

oncology
Tivozanib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With Axitinib: Subgroup Analysis from TIVO-3

Luis Meza,David F McDermott,Bernard Escudier,Thomas E Hutson,Camillo Porta,Elena Verzoni,Michael B Atkins,Vijay Kasturi,Sumanta K Pal,Brian Rini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac255

2023-03-17

Abstract:Background: In phase III TIVO-3 trial, tivozanib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sorafenib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the effectiveness of this drug after exposure to other selective VEGFR agents has not yet been defined. Herein, we characterize the clinical efficacy of tivozanib in patients with mRCC previously treated with axitinib. Methods: We identified patients from the intention to treat (ITT) population, in the TIVO-3 trial, who received treatment with axitinib before enrolment in the study and evaluated PFS, response rate (RR), and safety. Results: Out of 350 patients, 172 (83:89, tivozanib:sorafenib) had received prior treatment with axitinib in TIVO-3. In this subgroup, PFS was 5.5 months with tivozanib and 3.7 months with sorafenib (HR 0.68). RR was 13% and 8% favoring tivozanib. Conclusions: Tivozanib is active in the treatment of patients with mRCC who have progressed on prior therapies, including axitinib.
Tivozanib: A New Hope for Treating Renal Cell Carcinoma

Indu Passi,Koushal Billowria,Bhupinder Kumar,Pooja A Chawla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520622666220617103126

Abstract:Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a diverse collection of malignancies with varying histological characteristics, molecular changes, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Tivozanib was first approved in March 2021 by USFDA with the brand name Fotivda. Tivozanib hydrochloride monohydrate is an oral medication that is used to treat relapsed or refractory renal cell carcinoma. Objective: In this review, we explain renal cell carcinoma and its different types of treatment by the anti-renal carcinoma drugs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the relevant databases, like ScienceDirect, PubMed, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar, to identify the studies. Conclusion: Tivozanib is an oral VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is extremely selective and powerful. It has much less affinity for other receptor tyrosine kinases than multi-targeted TKIs now in clinical use. Because of its long half-life in circulation, it may be able to block VEGFRs more consistently. Doserelated controllable hypertension is its most commonly seen drug-related side event. Fatigue, hoarseness, and diarrhea, which are all common side effects, are not dose-related. Because of its target specificity, tivozanib can work well with other medications that have low side effects. Blocking both the VEGF and mTOR signaling pathways at the same time provides the benefit of synergistic antitumor efficacy while also preventing treatment resistance. Thus, overall we can say that the drug tivozanib is suitable for treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma and can be investigated in multi-center clinical trials.
Clinical Outcomes of Tivozanib Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicentric UK Real-World Analysis

Jonathan Heseltine,Jennifer Allison,Sam Wong,Kellati Prasad,Zhu-Chuen Oong,Helen Wong,Andrea Law,Natalie Charnley,Omi Parikh,Tom Waddell,Shien Chow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-00972-8

Abstract:Background: Tivozanib is a licensed as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Objective: To evaluate the outcomes from tivozanib in a real-world mRCC population. Patients and methods: Patients with mRCC commencing first-line tivozanib between March 2017 and May 2019 were identified across four specialist cancer centres in the UK. Data relating to response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected retrospectively with censoring on 31 December 2020. Results: A total of 113 patients were identified: median age was 69 years; 78% had ECOG PS 0-1; 82% had clear cell histology; 66% had previous nephrectomy; International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score was 22% favourable (F), 52% intermediate (I) and 26% poor (P). Twenty-six per cent were switched from another tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to tivozanib due to toxicity. Median follow-up was 26.6 months with 18% remaining on treatment at data censoring. Median PFS was 8.75 months. Median PFS by IMDC risk group was: F = 23.0 months; I = 10.0 months; P = 3.0 months, p value < 0.0001. Median OS was 25.0 months (F = not reached (NR) with 72% alive at data cut-off; I = 26.0 months; P = 7.0 months, p value < 0.0001). Seventy-seven per cent had an AE of any grade, and 13% had a grade ≥ 3 AE. Eighteen per cent of patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. No patients who discontinued a prior TKI due to AEs stopped tivozanib due to AEs. Conclusions: These data suggest comparable activity of tivozanib with the pivotal trial data and other TKIs in a real-world population. Its tolerability positions tivozanib as an attractive first-line option for those unsuitable for combination therapies or unable to tolerate other TKIs.
Tivozanib plus nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma following an immune checkpoint inhibitor: results of the phase 3 TiNivo-2 Study

Toni K Choueiri,Laurence Albiges,Philippe Barthélémy,Roberto Iacovelli,Sheik Emambux,Javier Molina-Cerrillo,Benjamin Garmezy,Pedro Barata,Arnab Basu,Maria T Bourlon,Helen Moon,Raffaele Ratta,Rana R McKay,Alexander Chehrazi-Raffle,Hans Hammers,Daniel Y C Heng,Edgar Braendle,Kathryn E Beckermann,Bradley A McGregor,Robert J Motzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01758-6

2024-09-12

Abstract:Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are cornerstones of first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, optimal treatment sequencing after progression is unknown. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes of tivozanib-nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed following one or two lines of therapy in the post-ICI setting. Methods: TiNivo-2 is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 190 sites across 16 countries, in Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and progression during or after one to two previous lines of therapy (including one ICI) were randomised 1:1 to tivozanib (0·89 mg per day, orally) plus nivolumab (480 mg every 4 weeks, intravenously) or tivozanib (1·34 mg per day, orally). Randomisation was stratified by immediate previous therapy (ICI or non-ICI) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk category. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to first documentation of objective progressive disease according to RECIST 1·1 or death from any cause, whichever came first, by independent radiology review. Efficacy was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in patients who received one or more doses of the study drug. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04987203) and is active and not recruiting. Findings: From Nov 4, 2021, to June 16, 2023, 343 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib-nivolumab (n=171) or tivozanib monotherapy (n=172). Median follow-up was 12·0 months. Median PFS was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-7·4) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 7·4 months (5·6-9·2) with tivozanib monotherapy (hazard ratio 1·10, 95% CI 0·84-1·43; p=0·49). Among those with an ICI as their immediate previous therapy (n=244), median PFS was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6-9·6) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 9·2 months (7·4-10·0) with tivozanib monotherapy. With non-ICIs as the most recent therapy, lower median PFS was observed, with no difference between groups (tivozanib-nivolumab 3·7 months [95% CI 2·7-5·4] and with tivozanib monotherapy 3·7 months [1·9-7·2]). Serious adverse events occurred in 54 (32%) of 168 patients receiving tivozanib-nivolumab and 64 (37%) of 171 patients receiving tivozanib monotherapy. One (<1%) treatment-related death occurred (tivozanib group). Interpretation: These data further support that ICI rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, these data suggest that tivozanib monotherapy has efficacy in the post-ICI setting. Funding: Aveo Pharmaceuticals.
Safety and Efficacy of Tivozanib in First-Line mRCC: A Multicenter Compassionate-Use Study (Meet-Uro 16)

Umberto Basso,Giuseppe Procopio,Giuseppe Fornarini,Francesco Massari,Alessandra Bearz,Lucia Fratino,Michele Milella,Maria Bassanelli,Paola Ermacora,Davide Bimbatti,Elena Verzoni,Mimma Rizzo,Camillo Porta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000515951

Oncology

Abstract:Introduction: Tivozanib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR-1), VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3, recently approved in Europe for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: Retrospective analysis of safety and activity of tivozanib administered at 1.34 mg daily (3 weeks on, 1 week off) within a compassionate-use program to patients with mRCC with no prior systemic treatment in Italy. Results: From August 2018 to April 2019, 64 patients have started tivozanib in 9 oncology units. The median age was 67.5 years (range 40-85), 62.5% males. According to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria, 27.1% of patients were good prognosis, 57.6% intermediate, and 15.3% poor. Primary tumor had been removed in 71.9% of patients. Histology was clear cell 89%, papillary 4.7%, and unclassified 6.3%. The response rate was 34.4%, stable disease 40.6%, and progression 15.6%. Grade 3-4 toxicities were 7.8% hypertension, 4.7% anemia, 3.1% mucositis, 3.1% asthenia, 1.6% diarrhea, 1.6% anorexia, 1.6% worsening of renal function, and 3.1% cardiac events. Dose reduction to 0.89 mg was applied to 17.2% of patients, and the discontinuation rate due to toxicity was 5.8%. Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months, with 68.7% of patients alive at 12 months. The developing of hypertension predicted increased progression-free survival at multivariate analysis (HR, 0.128; 95% CI, 0.03-0.59; p = 0.008). Conclusions: Tivozanib showed good activity and favorable safety profile in a real-world cohort of unselected patients with mRCC. Predictive biomarkers of response to antiangiogenic therapy are urgently needed in order to identify RCC patients who could still receive a monotherapy with VEGFR inhibitors in the first line.
Neuroradiology and computer tomography.

A. Wackenheim

Abstract:
Efficacy and safety of tivozanib in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer, an NCCN phase II trial

Mathew Cowan,Wendy M Swetzig,Valery Adorno-Cruz,Mario J Pineda,Nikki L Neubauer,Emily Berry,John R Lurain,Shohreh Shahabi,Deanna Taiym,Valerie Nelson,Kaitlyn Lucrezia O'Shea,Masha Kocherginsky,Daniela Matei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.005

Abstract:Objective: Tivozanib is a potent selective pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a long half-life. This study assessed its activity in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (OC). Methods: This open-label phase II study used a Simon's two-stage design. Eligible patients had recurrent, platinum-resistant OC and measurable or detectable disease. There was no limit on the number of prior regimens. Treatment consisted of tivozanib 1.5 mg orally once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity assessment. Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled, and 30 were treated. The median age was 59.5 years, and median number of prior regimens was 4 (range 1-9). Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response, and four (16.7%) achieved a partial response (PR; ORR = 16.7%). An additional fourteen (58.3%) patients had stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (PR + SD) was 75.0%, and the median duration of objective response was 5.7 months. For all patients on trial, the median PFS was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-5.8) and OS 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-12.5). There were no treatment-related deaths. Serious adverse events occurred in 13.3% of patients and included small intestinal perforation or obstruction and stroke. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 60% of patients, including hypertension (26.7%) and fatigue (10%). Conclusions: Tivozanib is effective in patients with recurrent OC, with moderate toxicity and no treatment-related deaths, supporting its further development.
Temporal Characteristics of Adverse Events of Tivozanib and Sorafenib in Previously Treated Kidney Cancer

Zeynep B Zengin,Sumanta K Pal,David F McDermott,Bernard Escudier,Thomas E Hutson,Camillo Porta,Elena Verzoni,Michael B Atkins,Vijay Kasturi,Brian Rini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.005

Abstract:Introduction: Tivozanib, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, met the primary endpoint of improved progression free survival compared to sorafenib in the phase 3 TIVO-3 study in patients with previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In this study we sought to understand the temporal characteristics of treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) and frequency and timing of the dose modifications. Materials and methods: In this open label, randomized, phase 3 TIVO-3 study, previously treated patients with a diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and with measurable disease were included. Patients were randomized to receive either tivozanib 1.5 mg orally once daily in 4-week cycles or sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously. Based on updated safety analysis data (cutoff date of August 15, 2019), time to onset of the most commonly reported TRAEs, duration of toxicity, rate of dose modifications was calculated for each treatment arm. Results: Overall, 350 patients were randomly assigned to receive tivozanib or sorafenib;173 patients from the tivozanib arm and 170 patients from the sorafenib arm were included in this analysis. Patients received a median of 11.9 cycles (336 days) and 6.7 cycles (192 days) of tivozanib and sorafenib, respectively. Dose reductions, interruptions and treatment discontinuations were 25%, 50%, and 21%, and 39%, 50%, and 30% in the tivozanib and sorafenib arms, respectively, with a longer time to onset of TRAEs in the tivozanib arm. Conclusion: Tivozanib was associated with less TRAEs, fewer dose modifications, a longer time to onset and a shorter duration of TRAEs compared to sorafenib.
Immunoelectrophoretic Investigation of the ϱ‐Proteins (Pre‐Albumins) of some Pathological Sera

F. Peetoom,Emmy Kramer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.1962.tb03258.x

1962-05-06

Vox Sanguinis

Abstract:By means of immunoelectrophoresis a study on the ρ‐proteins (pre‐albumins) of patients' sera was performed. In different diseases the two ρ‐proteins demonstrated appeared to undergo important quantitative changes. Decrease of both ρ‐proteins was observed in the serum of patients who suffered from protein lack in the food, cirrhosis of the liver or important tissue breakdown. The ρ‐levels returned to normal in recovering patients. No lowering of the ϱ‐proteins was observed in the nephrotic syndrome.
Q-TWiST Analysis of Tivozanib Versus Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the TIVO-3 Study

Michael Szarek,Michael N Needle,Brian I Rini,Sumanta K Pal,David F McDermott,Michael B Atkins,Thomas E Hutson,Bernard J Escudier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.018

Abstract:Background: In TIVO-3, tivozanib increased progression-free survival with no difference in overall survival relative to sorafenib as third- or fourth-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We applied quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease and toxicity (Q-TWiST) methods to quantify the net health benefits of tivozanib, in the presence of similar survival, when compared with sorafenib. Methods: The mean Q-TWiST was calculated by applying utility coefficients of 0.5, 1.0, and 0.5 to the 36-month restricted mean health states of time with toxicity (TOX), TWiST, and time after progression/relapse, respectively. The relative Q-TWiST gain was defined as the mean absolute Q-TWiST difference divided by the sorafenib mean overall survival. Results: The mean TWiST was longer for tivozanib than for sorafenib, mean time after progression/relapse was shorter for tivozanib, with no difference in mean TOX. Mean Q-TWiST was 15.04 months and 12.78 months for tivozanib and sorafenib, respectively (P = .0493). The tivozanib relative gain was 11.2%. Discussion: Tivozanib increased Q-TWiST relative to sorafenib, primarily through an increase in TWiST, which is generally considered to be the highest utility state. Conclusion: Q-TWiST may be considered an alternative patient-centered measure of benefit of tivozanib in as a third- or fourth-line therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02627963.
A Phase II Trial of Sitravatinib Plus Nivolumab after Progression on Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (Ccrcc).

Nazli Dizman,Nabil Adra,Ulka N. Vaishampayan,Lianchun Xiao,Ying Yuan,Matthew T. Campbell,Jianjun Gao,Amado J. Zurita,Eric Jonasch,Nizar M. Tannir,Amishi Yogesh Shah,Pavlos Msaouel,Andrew Warren Hahn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4542

IF: 45.3

2024-01-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:4542 Background: Sitravatinib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR, TAM, and MET, has been shown to resensitize the tumor microenvironment to ICI by reducing immune-suppressive myeloid cells in metastatic ccRCC (Msaouel, Sci Transl Med 2022). ICI is the standard first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic ccRCC, and there is unmet need for improved treatment outcomes after progression on ICI. We hypothesized that sitravatinib plus nivolumab would revert an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) to improve objective response rate (ORR) and survival in patients with metastatic ccRCC whose disease progressed on or after ICI. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, phase II, multicenter trial (NCT04904302), patients with progressive metastatic ccRCC after 1-2 lines of treatment were enrolled into three cohorts: Cohort A) progression on 1L nivolumab + ipilimumab, Cohort B) progression on 1L pembrolizumab + axitinib or 2L anti-PD-1 therapy after receiving 1L VEGF-targeted monotherapy, Cohort C) progression on 1L or 2L cabozantinib or lenvatinib +/- everolimus either before, after, or in combination with anti-PD-1 ICI. Starting dose of sitravatinib was 100 mg PO daily and nivolumab was 480 mg IV every 4 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were ORR [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] and disease control rate [DCR; CR, PR or stable disease (SD) at 24 weeks]. The study was designed to enroll 88 patients with an interim analysis for futility in each cohort using a BOP2 design, but it was terminated early due to discontinuation of sitravatinib development by the sponsor. Results: 14 patients were enrolled with 2 in cohort A, 6 in cohort B and 6 in cohort C. Most patients had IMDC intermediate risk disease (n=11, 78.6%), 7 patients had prior nephrectomy (50%), and sarcomatoid dedifferentiation was present in the tumors of 2 patients (7.1%). Across all cohorts, the ORR was 15.4% (2/13, 1 patient not evaluable) and DCR at 24 weeks was 35.7% (5/14). The 2 patients who experienced a PR were pre-treated with nivolumab + ipilimumab and pembrolizumab + axitinib. DCR at 24 months was 63% for Cohort A+B and 0% for Cohort C. After a median follow up of 11.9 months (mo), 10 patients had discontinued treatment (71.4%), all due to disease progression, and 6 patients had died (42.9%). Median progression free survival was 5.5 mo [ 95% CI 3.8 – not reached (NR)], and median overall survival was 13.3 mo (95% CI 8.77 – NR). Six patients (42.9%) experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) and 2 patients (14.3%) experienced an immune-mediated AE. Conclusions: In this small phase 2 trial with limited sample size due to early termination, sitravatinib plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and produced modest clinical benefit. The observed responses occurred in patients who did not receive prior treatment with cabozantinib or lenvatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT04904302 .
Tivozanib monotherapy outperforms combination therapy in post-ICI RCC

Maria Chiara Masone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00971-y

2024-11-13

Nature Reviews Urology

Abstract:The multicentre, randomized, phase III trial TiNivo-2 was conducted to assess the efficacy of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor tivozanib alone versus in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had progressed during or after 1–2 previous lines of therapy including one ICI. Progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in patients in the monotherapy group (7.4 months) than in patients receiving combination therapy (5.7 months; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84–1.43; P = 0.49). These results show that re-challenging patients with advanced RCC with ICI therapy is not advisable and suggest tivozanib monotherapy as a viable treatment option in the post-ICI setting.

urology & nephrology
Resveratrol enhances sensitivity of renal cell carcinoma to tivozanib: An in-vitro study

Diana Taher,Helia Azodian Ghajar,Akram Mirzaei,Rahil Mashhadi,Seyedeh Negin Hashemi Dougaheh,Razman Arabzadeh Bahri,Mahdi Khoshchehreh,Ali Tavoosian,Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2024.102584

2024-10-12

Abstract:Background: Since tivozanib has many side effects in the treatment of kidney cancer, we decided to use resveratrol as a bioactive molecule with anticancer and antioxidant properties to make tivozanib more effective and also reduce its side effects in kidney cancer cell line. Method: In this in vitro study, we evaluated the effect of tivozanib, resveratrol and tivozanib- resveratrol combination therapy in ACHN cell line as representatives of human kidney cancer. The assessment includes Hoechst dye staining, scratch-wound assay, 3D spheroid, 2D colony formation assay, flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis and DNA cell cycle, real-time PCR (BAX/BCL2, E-cadherin, Snail, HIF1α, VEGFC and KLK3 genes). Result: To determine IC50 levels, ACHN cells was exposed to different concentration of tivozanib and resveratrol. Our data indicated that IC50 values for tivozanib (0.5 μM) and resveratrol (30 μM) with MTT in a dose and time-dependent manner. Due to the efficacy of resveratrol in combination with tivozanib, we used 20 μM resveratrol, and 0.25 μM tivozanib instead of 30 μM and 0.25 μM respectively. This data was approved by flow cytometry for ACHN cell line with 38.39, 14.74 and 66.06 percent apoptosis and 8.25, 5.12 and 15.6 percent subG1 for tivozanib, resveratrol and tivozanib-resveratrol combination respectively which was as a consequence of cell cycle arrest at G1/S phase. The treatment also reduced cells' migration, fragmented nuclei, 3D spheroid and colony formation potentials in analyses. Evaluation of gene expression presented that the effect of the tivozanib and resveratrol combination in ACHN cell lines is completely different during the evaluation of apoptosis genes, BAX, P53 genes and E-Cadherin had significantly increased expression compared to single treatment groups (P < 0.01). Meanwhile, a significant decrease was observed in the expression of VEGFC and HIF1α genes in the combination group compared to the monotherapy groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Considering that resveratrol can increase the apoptosis of cancer cells alone and in combination with tivozanib and prevent the proliferation of cancer cells and also reduce the side effects of tivozanib, we suggest that resveratrol as a potential bioactive molecule can be used in treatment of kidney cancer should be used in combination with tivozanib.
Toripalimab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib As First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: RENOTORCH, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study

X. Q. Yan,M. J. Yey,Q. Zou,P. Chen,Z. S. He,B. Wu,D. L. He,C. H. He,X. Y. Xue,Z. G. Ji,H. Chen,S. Zhang,Y. P. Liu,X. D. Zhang,C. Fu,D. F. Xu,M. X. Qiu,J. J. Lv,J. Huang,X. B. Ren,Y. Cheng,W. J. Qin,X. Zhang,F. J. Zhou,L. L. Ma,J. M. Guo,D. G. Ding,S. Z. Wei,Y. He,H. Q. Guo,B. K. Shi,L. Liu,F. Liu,Z. Q. Hu,X. M. Jin,L. Yang,S. X. Zhu,J. H. Liu,Y. H. Huang,T. Xu,B. Liu,T. Sun,Z. J. Wang,H. W. Jiang,D. X. Yu,A. P. Zhou,J. Jiang,G. D. Luan,C. L. Jin,J. Xu,J. X. Hu,Y. R. Huang,J. Guo,W. Zhai,X. N. Sheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3108

IF: 51.769

2024-01-01

Annals of Oncology

Abstract:Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are standard treatments for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase III RENOTORCH study compared the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for the first-line treatment of patients with intermediate-/poor-risk advanced RCC. Patients and methods: Patients with intermediate-/poor-risk unresectable or metastatic RCC were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive toripalimab (240 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) plus axitinib (5 mg orally twice daily) or sunitinib [50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle) or 2 weeks (3-week cycle)]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: A total of 421 patients were randomized to receive toripalimab plus axitinib (n = 210) or sunitinib (n = 211). With a median follow-up of 14.6 months, toripalimab plus axitinib significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 35% compared with sunitinib as assessed by an IRC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.86; P = 0.0028]. The median PFS was 18.0 months in the toripalimabeaxitinib group, whereas it was 9.8 months in the sunitinib group. The IRC-assessed ORR was significantly higher in the toripalimabeaxitinib group compared with the sunitinib group (56.7% versus 30.8%; P < 0.0001). An OS trend favoring toripalimab plus axitinib was also observed (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.92). Treatment-related grade >= 3 adverse events occurred in 61.5% of patients in the toripalimabeaxitinib group and 58.6% of patients in the sunitinib group. Conclusion: In patients with previously untreated intermediate-/poor-risk advanced RCC, toripalimab plus axitinib provided significantly longer PFS and higher ORR than sunitinib and had a manageable safety profile

The distribution of calmodulin/calmodulin binding proteins in the rat tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta.

Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial

The role of the clinical pharmacist in reducing mortality in hospitalized cardiac patients: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial using propensity score methods.

Current Status of Tivozanib in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tivozanib (TIVO) in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Tivozanib in relapsed or refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma: a focus on US approval

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tivozanib in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Tivozanib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Previously Treated With Axitinib: Subgroup Analysis from TIVO-3

Tivozanib: A New Hope for Treating Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Outcomes of Tivozanib Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicentric UK Real-World Analysis

Tivozanib plus nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma following an immune checkpoint inhibitor: results of the phase 3 TiNivo-2 Study

Safety and Efficacy of Tivozanib in First-Line mRCC: A Multicenter Compassionate-Use Study (Meet-Uro 16)

Neuroradiology and computer tomography.

Efficacy and safety of tivozanib in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer, an NCCN phase II trial

Temporal Characteristics of Adverse Events of Tivozanib and Sorafenib in Previously Treated Kidney Cancer

Immunoelectrophoretic Investigation of the ϱ‐Proteins (Pre‐Albumins) of some Pathological Sera

Q-TWiST Analysis of Tivozanib Versus Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the TIVO-3 Study

A Phase II Trial of Sitravatinib Plus Nivolumab after Progression on Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (Ccrcc).

Tivozanib monotherapy outperforms combination therapy in post-ICI RCC

Resveratrol enhances sensitivity of renal cell carcinoma to tivozanib: An in-vitro study

Toripalimab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib As First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: RENOTORCH, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study